Did 41,000 votes go missing in the London elections?

I’ve blogged previously (here and here) about some of the errors which came to light in the London election results. None of these were serious in their own right, but they do cast doubt on how good the checking processes really were. Now a comprehensive review has suggested that up to 41,000 votes went unaccounted for:

Although the glitches are unlikely to have changed the overall result of the mayoral race – Boris Johnson won by almost 140,000 votes after second choices were taken into consideration – today’s report lists a string of potentially serious problems with the counting procedures used in the mayoral and London Assembly elections.

Among the deficiencies highlighted in the report are the counting of blank ballots as valid votes, frequent jams in the scanning machines and a series of bugs and system freezes. ORG’s observers also reported that they were refused access to parts of the process at counts in London Olympia and Alexandra Palace.

In at least two cases, the margin of error was greater than the winning candidate’s margin of victory, leading the group to conclude that there was “insufficient evidence” for it to say that the results were accurate.

That’s not good.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in London.

One Comment

  • David Evans 2nd Jul '08 - 6:21pm

    I have worked in the audit of technology systems for many years and my advice to anyone is “Don’t let your democracy be subverted by it”. Take the systems that support “Hole in the Wall” cash machines on the High Street. The one key piece of evidence that they are functioning correctly is “How many customers write after checking their statements to say ‘I didn’t take out that £50’. If it is very low, the system is working satisfactorily. However, this check is not available for voting.
    The key (and possibly the only worthwhile) check at the counting stage is party members scrutinising the counters. I remember a count in Colne where a pile of 50 ballots were counted as Conservative, where only the top two were, the rest were ours. Our counting agents spotted it and we won by eight votes. I’m sure Mr Greaves will remember the exact details. You can’t check to that level of detail how a machine has worked out its result.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Chris Moore
    Hello Mary, you say this, "he party made a huge tactical error – when they could have had massive influence on a vote by vote basis – and betrayed millio...
  • Gwyn Williams
    As a student some 44 years ago, I delivered leaflets in a byelection in a new(ish)housing estate on the outskirts of Reading. It was uneventful until a furious ...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Might we please have a pamphlet or three on the harsh harm done to so many in our policy-deprived, not-rich fellow citizens and the some 25% of our children w...
  • David Blake
    Leaflets work, but they have to contain more than just 'Labour can't win here'. We need to get people voting for us because of our policies and values, not jus...
  • Alex Macfie
    @Mary Fulton: Confidence & Supply would have had the same risks for us as a full-blown coalition. It would have looked like we were just propping up the Tor...