Mathew on Monday: “We need to be bold”

EXCLUSIVE: “We need to be bold, we need to be relevant, and we need to show people that we’re serious” – party figures react to news of strategy review

This weekend news broke, via PoliticsHome, that the Lib Dems are conducting an internal review of policy after concerns that had previously been kept mostly behind closed doors became public, with figures including former leadership candidate and current Chair of the Commons Health Select Committee Layla Moran speaking to the outlet about a “frustration” that the party’s been talking about the same things and that we “weren’t really moving forward.”

Despite achieving the party’s best result in a century in 2024, 72 seats in the House of Commons, it’s widely felt that since then we’ve been lost in the shuffle and all too easy to ignore.

Since the news of the review became public I’ve been speaking to people throughout the party, from parliamentarians to grassroots members for this column, about their reaction and what they want to see from the review.

Lib Dem MP for Harrogate and Knaresborough Tom Gordon, who was also quoted in the PoliticsHome piece, told me:

The political landscape is shifting fast, and voters who are frustrated with the status quo are actively looking for somewhere to go. The Lib Dems have a real opportunity here, but we have to be willing to step up with a distinctive, ambitious offer that speaks to the whole country.

He added,

We need to be bold, we need to be relevant, and we need to show people that we’re serious. Our members will not forgive us if we miss the boat.

There’s been increasing concerns that our messaging seems to only be aimed at the once Tory leafy shires, with nothing to appeal to previously Labour dominated cities. On that point, Councillor Victor Chamberlain, leader in Southwark and the new Deputy Leader of the local Council following the announcement of the new Green/Lib Dems administration in the Borough, agrees;

The strategy review needs to confront an uncomfortable truth: the Liberal Democrats have an urban problem. We now run more councils than the Tories and are delivering liberal policies across Britain, yet too much of the party’s focus remains shaped by our parliamentary success rather than the cities where millions of potential supporters live.

He continues;

In Southwark, we did everything the party says wins elections, but still felt held back by a national offer that didn’t cut through. If we’re serious about becoming a party of (national) government, we need to attract more young people, more diverse communities and more urban voters. The opportunity is enormous if we’re willing to adapt.

Added to this are questions about whether we are, in any meaningful sense, really a national party any longer. Former Councillor and East Midlands Mayoral candidate Helen Tamblyn-Saville, from Nottinghamshire, says we no longer appear to have a national strategy beyond us being local champions, telling me:

Liberal Democrats are excellent at community politics, and our councillors are hardworking people who gets things done. Community politics is one of the best traditions of our party. Yet somewhere along the way, it appears to have become a substitute for a national strategy. Community politics is integral to our party. It’s how we serve people. The problem is, without a strong national strategy, we’re vulnerable to political tides beyond our control. Even the best councillors can see their support disappear when national politics shifts.

She continues,

Here in the East Midlands we have hardworking champions who work incredibly hard for their communities, yet we have no parliamentary representation. In Nottinghamshire, we don’t even have county representation. The answer cannot always be to knock on more doors and work harder.

The party acknowledges that in May, the Greens made gains despite not doing much of the traditional campaigning that we do. Yet voters are clear on what the Greens stand for. They have a clear national message and a strong focus on social media, meaning that they are reaching younger voters in a way that we are increasingly struggling to do.

For too long, the party appears to have looked at a campaign strategy through the lens of strong southern seats, and underestimates the realities in places like mine, where community politics alone is not enough to break through. If we want to be a genuinely national party, we need to ask why voters know what populist parties such as Reform and the Greens stand for, but struggle to explain what we stand for.

That’s something which party member and activist Andy Chandler, from Stoke-On-Trent in the West Midlands, agrees, asking:

Do we see ourselves as a national party, or are we in danger of relegating ourselves as the Tory-shires version of Quebec’s Bloc Quebecois, an unofficial regional party of the South-West and parts of the South-East, devoted to that small electorate.

Andy tells me that we need to strengthen our offer on the big challenges facing 21st Century Britain:

Housing, Europe, defence, economic renewal, and combating populism. But I increasingly worry that our party lacks the vision, boldness, and confidence needed to meet these challenges.

As someone who regularly speaks to voters, friends and family as a grassroots member, I hear the same criticism time and again: people know what we’re against, but they don’t know what we’re for. We have become effective critics but ineffective storytellers. We are losing the battle for attention because we are failing to offer a compelling vision of Britain’s future.

And finally let’s hear from my favourite ever Lib Dem, the always wonderful Lynne Featherstone, now part of our Lords team and, of course, when an MP, the architect of the landmark same sex marriage legislation enacted by the Coalition which extended liberty and justice for millions and if that’s not the very definition of Liberalism then I don’t know what is.

She tells me:

I want a strategy of hope. Of a national message that moves people-a message that ‘no one shall be enslaved by ignorance, poverty or conformity’ – a decent future for a decent nation.

Hear Hear to that!

Good Policy, Invisible Politics

This item rather follows on from the one above. Lib Dem Deputy Leader, and our Treasury spokesperson, Daisy Cooper’s announcement of a new “Essential Energy Guarantee” is exactly the sort of policy the Liberal Democrats should be championing. At a time when millions of households remain anxious about rising bills, the proposal would provide every household with a basic allowance of discounted energy, alongside additional support for families with children and those on lower incomes.

It is a practical, liberal response to a real problem, recognising that access to affordable energy is not a luxury but a necessity.

Yet there is a deeper problem. I support the policy, but I had to actively search for coverage of Daisy’s announcement. Eventually I found it on BBC iPlayer, but after a lot of scrolling. That should concern all of us.
The challenge facing our party is not a lack of good ideas. It is that all too often these ideas fail to cut through. We can produce thoughtful, credible policies, but if voters never hear about them, then the political impact is limited.

Daisy is one of the most capable performers in British politics. The policy is sound. The question is why announcements like this still struggle to break into the national conversation. Until we solve that problem, we risk remaining a party with excellent answers that too few people ever hear.

Congratulations, Roger

And finally for today, congratulations to Roger Harmer on becoming the first ever Lib Dem leader of Birmingham City Council. It is a genuinely historic achievement and a testament to the hard work of party campaigners and councillors across the city for many years.

The Second City faces immense challenges, from restoring public confidence in local government to rebuilding services and securing its long-term future. Roger, who leads a Lib Dem-Green-Independents minority coalition-and his colleagues inherit no easy task, but they do so with an opportunity to demonstrate the values of community politics, competence and constructive leadership.

I wish Roger every success as he takes on one of the most demanding jobs in elected local government. Birmingham matters enormously to the West Midlands and to Britain. Here’s hoping this marks the beginning of a new and positive chapter for the city.

* Mathew Hulbert is a former Councillor, is a regular commentator on TV and Radio, and is Co-Host of the Political Frenemies podcast.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Matt (Bristol) 8th Jun '26 - 4:38pm

    I mean … ‘radical’ is an attractive to many people across the centre-left of politics, but your ‘radical’ is my ‘unprove / unwise leap in the dark’ and many many Lib Dems across your wonderful unwieldy coalition have different definitions of the concept. Doesn’t mean you shouldn’t try, but you need to make a coherent narrative to your ‘radical’ choices that makes the whole offer make sense, and keeps those who are sceptical about some aspects of the offer, on board with the whole.

    I fear – cynically, negatively, unhelpfully – that this is an attempt to stir up the activists and stop them wandering off in other directions, post-local elections, whilst there’s less voters to scare by being ‘radical’, and come the next round of elections it’ll be back to bowdlerised church-roof-ism and ‘don’t let the voters see the activists’ private agendas and pet projects’. I hope a) I am wrong and b) I am wrong in a way that will agree with my personal definitions of ‘radical’. But that’s probably expecting a lot of what-ifs to stack up in an unlikely combination of circumstances.

  • Mick Taylor 8th Jun '26 - 5:08pm

    It is NOT a review of policy. It’s a review of strategy, under section 5.1 of the constitution. We have enough policy to fill the British Library. The problems we face are the strategy of concentrating on the leafy shires instead of spreading our message more widely. Mike Dixon’s explainer email to party members makes this clear and offers members the chance to particpate in on-line discussion on STRATEGY, not policy. Check your inboxes and sign up for one of the discussions.

  • paul barker 8th Jun '26 - 6:19pm

    If we are going to attract new Voters, Young Voters & Women in particular, then we have to be prepared to annoy & appall some other Voters. Trying to please everybody ends up pleasing nobody.
    The Greens deserved their gains because they were prepared to take risks, it could have blown up in their faces. We used to take risks. Now we don’t.

  • Nigel Jones 8th Jun '26 - 9:01pm

    It is certainly true that community politics is insufficient for long term gain. That was my experience in 13 yrs as a councillor and still active locally; at one time we had 21 councillors, but when I joined I found most local Lib dem activists said we avoid national issues and concentrate on local. The result is we have now no one on the council and hardly any activists.

  • Nigel Jones 8th Jun '26 - 9:35pm

    @Mick Taylor, you are right to focus on strategy since we have plenty of policy, but i think we also need a vision and better messaging. It is easy to have strong simple messages that are negative but we must aim to have strong simple messaging that is positive about what can be done for people to work together as well as indicating what is wrong currently with Britain.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Meg Thomas
    We need to be very fearful of unbridled capitalism. I think it has fuelled inequality and been very damaging. Some people in this thread seem like libertarians...
  • Kira Collins
    @Peter Martin “ In 2024/25, the Barnett block grant amounted to £45bn in Scotland, £20bn in Wales and £18bn in N.Ireland. I would term these payments as f...
  • expats
    @theakes 8th Jun '26 - 12:20pm... We simple have to accept there will always be a level of inequality, it is in the human psyche.... Most families DON'T have...
  • Peter Davies
    @Peter Wrigley: You will be glad to know that the wealth ratio between the richest and poorest is already much lower than 10:1. It is in fact negative. There wi...
  • Nigel Jones
    @Mick Taylor, I agree we must be concerned about income inequality in current circumstances, though overcoming this is about taxing the rich, better public serv...