Mark Pack

Do the Conservatives want to exempt MPs from Freedom of Information rules after all?

By | Thu 23rd August 2007 - 12:00 am

You may recall the fuss over attempts by Conservative and Labour MPs to exempt MPs from the Freedom of Information Act. This would have allowed all sorts of things to be kept secret in future, but the supporters of the move claimed it was necessary to protect correspondence with constituents.

Now, one of the arguments (rightly) used against this was that the Data Protection Act protects constituents’ correspondence, so there was no need to exempt MPs from the Freedom of Information rules.

So, over to the Conservative Party, August 2007 policy proposals vintage. Their latest policy review group proposes scrapping the Data Protection Act (well, that’s one of their views, though they flip flop an awful lot within the document). So what would happen to correspondence with constituents?

Four options:

  1. The Conservatives really want private details in correspondence between MPs and constituents to be available to all and sundry (boo! hiss!).
  2. The Conservatives would actually resurrect the idea of exempting all MPs from the Freedom of Information Act (boo! hiss!).
  3. The Conservatives would scrap the act, but then straight away introduce new rules to deal with the mess they’ve created, so they aren’t really cutting regulation after all (surely not!).
  4. The Conservatives haven’t really got a clue what they’re doing (surely not!).
Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Stuart 23rd Aug '07 - 9:53am

    Well spotted. I suspected that it’s cock-up rather than conspiracy. I’d go with option 4 myself. Hywel’s arse & elbow illustration applies again.

  • Cheltenham Robin 24th Aug '07 - 4:04pm

    Is the answer 1234?

    It usually is.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jana
    Two seats where Restore standing has probably cost Reform gains. If this becomes an ongoing pattern, Farage may have to swallow his pride and do a deal with Res...
  • Chris Bowers
    Thank you to everyone who commented on my post, even if, by the end, the responses had drifted into the realm of comments-about-comments-about-comments. I think...
  • Chris Perry
    What the Prime Minister actually said was that if a prices link or 2.5% did not keep up with earnings over time the government would correct it. But that would ...
  • Chris Perry
    @James Hill. What Andy Burnham actually said was that if a prices link or 2.5% did not keep up with earnings over time (which is unlikely) the Government would ...
  • James Hill
    @Chris Perry I'm sorry Chris but you are wrong. Here is a direct quote from the PM's speech: "The state pension will continue to rise every year at least by ...