Does it matter where the Cabinet is held?

One of the more bizarre headlines today was from the BBC, Cabinet ‘may go to West Midlands’:

Gordon Brown will hold his first cabinet meeting after MPs’ long summer break outside London – most likely in the West Midlands. A Downing Street spokesman said the gathering was set for 8 September.

Ministers will also be taking part in a range of other events in the region on the day to give them an opportunity to “engage” with the public.

The spokesman said the move was part of the government’s commitment to “listen and learn” from people’s experiences.

Let’s move beyond the easy quips about the cabinet ‘being sent to Coventry’, and ask ourselves is this a gimmick, or a move worth making?

Gimmick: it’s easy to dismiss it as mere tokenism. But, then, a surprising amount of tokenism ends up in the mainstream. It’s undoubtedly true that much of what passes these days for the establishment is London-obsessed, and imagines the other municpalities to be full of feral chavs (except perhaps for the nice parts of Leeds, Manchester or Birmingham). At least the cabinet convening there might force the media to recognise that political stuff happens outside the M25 other than at party conferences.

Worth doing: but, really, what difference does convening one meeting outside of London make? It’s not as if the cabinet will be open to the public to address. If No. 10 really wanted to be innovative, they’d make this a Town Hall meeting, and invite half a dozen randomly selected folk to put their questions to the cabinet on camera rather than in camera. All we’ll get from this is a press release and some photo ops to prop up a few Labour marginals.

If Labour is going to attempt localism, I’m all for it. But why can’t I help thinking this idea sprang forth not from any sense of liberal idealism but a cynical attempt to capture the regional media for some well-primed media exposure?

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

6 Comments

  • David Morton 5th Aug '08 - 1:13am

    Its a stunt but no more of a stunt than calling for Gordon to boycott the Olypics closing ceremony to be boycotted.

    Serious gesture? make it Lib Dem policy to send a reformed second chamber to a regional english city. A Senate on the Aire rather than the Tiber. Though anyone that has watched Yes, Minister will know why it will never happen.

  • David Heigham 5th Aug '08 - 12:44pm

    Interesting. And how does this fit with the idea of a September reshuffle? Reshuffle before the picnic near Birmingham and Gordon Brown leaves the reshuffle losers to plot in Westminster. Reshuffle after, and what will the West Midlands media say? Or is it a first sign that Mr Brown has dithered away from the reshuffle he signalled?

    On the more substantial point, shifting the core of UK government from Westminster to Milton Keynes or one of the new “ecotowns” seems to me an excellent idea. But the vested interests who will oppose it make the effort not really worthwhile.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • John C
    I've always felt we should have a None Of The Above option on ballot papers. If it gets the most votes, it forces a fresh election where none of the original ca...
  • Daniel Walker
    @Peter Davis "Presumably, if your bank pays you 6p interest on your current account, it will cost you 20% of the difference between the pension and tax thres...
  • Catherine Royce
    Congratulations Tim, I'm sure you deserve it, (to be one rather than to be abolished) but its an interesting point. Can you lead a revolt from the inside? -do w...
  • Peter Martin
    "Increasing the basic threshold by £1000 will make someone on £40,000pa £200 a year better off whilst doing nothing for someone on £12000 a year though...
  • Peter Davies
    Healy is now saying that any pensioner with only a state pension will not have to pay tax. Presumably, if your bank pays you 6p interest on your current account...