DPMQs: LibDem MPs enjoy an untroubled post-questions lunch

Time was when Deputy Prime Minister’s Questions was the closest you got to bloodsports in the House of Commons. The DPM would be tethered, red-faced and growling, to the dispatch box, as Labour MPs taunted him and propelled all sorts of bile at him, augmented by the odd tactical nuclear missile rear-launched by the Tory swivel-eyes.

We’ve come a long way in a few months. Now, DPMQs are relatively sedate affairs. The DPM is well in control and there is little mischief from the Labour benches. Well, none that would spoil LibDem MPs’ lunches.

Indeed, at least four MPs found it difficult to summon enthusiasm for DPMQs this time. Unusually, that number tabled questions but couldn’t be bothered to turn up to ask them.

In response to a question from John Pugh (LibDem), Nick Clegg announced that the Joint Committee of both houses on House of Lords reform will report by 27th March 2012.

In answer to Sadiq Khan (Lab), the DPM was, again,House of Lords. Photo: Parliamentary copyright images are reproduced with the permission of Parliament very clear about reform:

Yes, of course…I support a fully elected second Chamber. The right hon. Gentleman’s party achieved precisely 0% of election to the other Chamber. I modestly suggest that if we achieve 80%, that will be better than 0%.

It is often assumed that Tory backbenchers are opposed to House of Lords reform. However, this session demonstrated that, on this subject, there is a nexus of sensible Tory MPs, particularly in the East of England. Daniel Poulter (Central Suffolk and North Ipswich) and Martin Vickers (Cleethorpes) both asked questions which were solidly supportive to reform. In fact, I detected much less Tory anti-reform noise than has previously been the case. Perhaps the whips have dusted off their old files.

About the most unsedate that the session got was when Sadiq Khan goaded Nick Clegg about a series of alleged LibDem failures to influence the government. Nick Clegg fired back, saying the government are “clearing up the mess” left behind by Labour and that Labour have nothing to say on the economy.

LibDem question of the week

Duncan Hames asked an excellent question highlighting that Labour councillors in Manchester have voted to reject the pupil premium to help children from the most challenging backgrounds.

Hold the front page

Labour’s Mike Gapes tried to suggest that it was some sort of evidence of a major rift in the coalition that Nick Clegg and William Hague met the German foreign minister this week in separate meetings.

Career limiting question

Peter Bone (Con – Swivel-eyed) is obsessed with who will takeover as Prime Minister if David Cameron dies. He’s asked the question several times now – almost as often as he reads out dispatches from “Mrs Bone” – and asked again at this DPMQs. Bear in mind that the last British Prime Minister to die in office was Palmerston in 1865. No surprise, then, that Nick Clegg got a big laugh when he retorted:

I must say…that his morbid fascination with the premature death of his own party leader is a subject not for me, but for the Chief Whip.

Other subjects covered were:

-Lobbying
-Armed Forces electoral registration
-The Electoral Register
-Electoral Participation
-The Boundary Commission proposals
-Topical issues

Paul Walter blogs at Liberal Burblings

* Paul Walter is a Liberal Democrat activist. He is one of the Liberal Democrat Voice team. He blogs at Liberal Burblings.

Read more by or more about , , , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Parliament.
Advert

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarNonconformistradical 5th Aug - 7:04am
    @David Raw "@ Martin Smith Great post, Martin. Good to hear the voice of sanity." Seconded - from a household which includes 1 who got...
  • User AvatarCatherine Jane Crosland 5th Aug - 5:49am
    What a nice idea. The party certainly needs a wise, caring "agony aunt" right now
  • User AvatarPhil Beesley 4th Aug - 11:46pm
    Marco: "I don’t think that’s correct as thanks to a certain progressive political party people don’t pay income tax until they earn at least £12k...
  • User Avatartim rogers 4th Aug - 11:41pm
    Anxious. It is the talk of continuity that has many people alarmed. Do we continue to poll at 6% and accept it? Do we continue...
  • User Avatarbrothertony 4th Aug - 11:08pm
    Hmmm. So many column inches about Party organisation. Constitutional issues r us.
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 4th Aug - 11:00pm
    @ Martin Smith Great post, Martin. Good to hear the voice of sanity.