Duncan Hames MP writes… Help shape Party policy in two new working groups

The Federal Policy Committee is advertising for members for two new policy working groups: Reform of Public Services, and Tackling Crime and Reform of the Criminal Justice system.

The Public Services group will look at overarching issues relevant to all public services, including themes like decentralisation and user empowerment, and also address specific policy issues in major services like education and health.

The other group will look at all aspects of preventing and reducing crime and the fear of crime, through the whole range of policy interventions.

Both groups are expected to produce policy papers for the Autumn 2014 party conference.

The work of these groups will deliver a big part of our policy platform for the 2015 election – so I would encourage party members who feel they can contribute creative policy ideas to put themselves forward.

For an application form for these working groups please email the Policy Unit on [email protected] The deadline for applications is Monday 17th June 2013.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Party policy and internal matters.
Advert

4 Comments

  • David Wilkinson 3rd Jun '13 - 4:12pm

    Why? so Cleggie can ignore it, remember secret courts, tutition fees, then we have the changes to the NHS, the bedroom tax and the list goes on.
    3 years later and still no changes to the MP’s and Lords lobbying rules,but the poor, the unemeployment etc get hammered every day with new cost cutting ideas.
    We are all in together!!

  • I shouldn’t bother joining a working group. You slog your guts out on 20+ meetings to design the best policy, do research, test ideas with experts, run consultation sessions at federal & regional conferences, seek members’ views online through surveys, videos, LDV postings etc, spend ages writing up a consistent paper to reflect all that … and then in an hour-and-half of self-importance, based on no knowledge, evidence or research (and in many cases not even having read the paper), FPC decides to change it completely.

    Some of the ignorant comments at FPC are breath-taking, like criticising “dangerous new ideas” that have actually been party policy already for over 10 years. Or pushing for “fundamental” changes in the law that, ahem, already exist in law today. So much of FPC debate seems to be grand-standing to win some internal battle, irrespective of the merits of the issue itself.

    Being on a policy working group is a complete waste of time if FPC are going to act like this. I won’t waste my time on this again and wouldn’t advise anyone else to bother.

  • Richard Fagence 4th Jun '13 - 9:42am

    Completely agree with Peter. Add me to the list, Duncan, particularly to reducing crime and fear of crime. I believe I may have relevant recent experience as a retired civilian police employee.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Martin Gray
    Centrist governments support the rules of international order. Sadly , when it comes to the Palestine those rules , those values , have all but been abandoned...
  • Peter Hirst
    For all its faults, America remains a democracy and we must retain our links. Brexit allows us to show flexibility in our strategic relations. We must now allow...
  • David Raw
    As a long time student of political history who first joined (and was employed by) the Liberal Party way back in 1962, I've come to believe that the basic quali...
  • Peter Hirst
    Putting country before party seems to me to be quite apposite in the context of the last decade. The Party system is a weakness of our present structures. It is...
  • Peter Hirst
    If we really wish to change this country then we must have an eye for the next election. Many new MPs will want to retain their seats. We must win the popular d...