Eastleigh by-election: your essential round-up of the latest campaign news (28 Feb Polling Day Edition!)

Welcome to the final round-up of the Eastleigh by-election campaign…

goodmorning_ld

It was the week when Mike Thornton’s campaign received a boost from former Lib Dem leader Paddy Ashdown on Tuesday:

Then yesterday as Nick Clegg made his final visit of the campaign:

This was the message last night from party president Tim Farron:

ld_eastleigh_good morningAnd this was the scene in the Eastleigh HQ a couple of hours ago, as Lib Dems began delivering ‘Good morning!’ leaflets to those voters the party’s been canvassing the past three weeks, and working hard for over the past two or more decades.

For those who’ve never been involved in a polling day operation, today is the day the focus shifts from talking to as many voters as possible towards ensuring you ‘Get Out The Vote’ you’ve identified over the past few weeks of canvassing. That’s done by delivering leaflets — despite everything, campaigners are constantly amazed how many voters will respond on polling day, “Oh, is it today then?” — knocking on doors, and by phoning people to remind them that their vote matters today.

ld_eastleigh_pubAnd that support can be found in some pretty unlikely places…

It’s not too late to help — here’s a reminder of how you can help Mike Thornton’s campaign:

Tomorrow morning will be too late. There has rarely been a more important by-election for the party. It’s up to us whether we remember it for the right reasons or not…

What the papers say

It’s not been the easiest few days for the Lib Dem campaign, with the backdrop of the allegations about Chris Rennard’s conduct. But it’s hard to disagree with this assessment by Steve Richards in the Independent:

Everyone’s a winner if the Lib Dems win Eastleigh
…if the Lib Dems hold Eastleigh, Clegg will move significantly further away from the cliff’s edge. In spite of the Rennard furore and his party’s association with a dismal economic situation, the Lib Dems would have held a seat, showing that in areas where they are already strong they can still win. Clegg’s MPs would relax a little. If they can hold a constituency where the former sitting MP faces jail, they might be able to retain their seats at the next election. Clegg’s authority would be enhanced, his strategy of projecting his party as a governing force would have received a degree of vindication.

And IF the Tories lose…

Let’s take nothing, and I mean absolutely nothing, for granted… But if the Tories lose to the Lib Dems today’s papers hold a hint of the backlash David Cameron can expect:

Eastleigh by-election: David Cameron has the most to lose (Telegraph)
With less than 24 hours before polls open in Eastleigh, I still haven’t spoken to a single Conservative who thinks their party is going to win tomorrow. Of course, we have to be wary of by-election expectations management, but as far as I can tell, Tory bets really are on a Lib Dem hold tomorrow night. Isn’t that a remarkable state of affairs?

Eastleigh flop would be a crisis for David Cameron, top Tory warns (Guardian)
Eleven of the Tories’ top 43 target seats are held by the Lib Dems, and senior Conservatives are preparing for a bitter inquest if they fail to capture Eastleigh. [David] Davis said: “I think if we came third it would be a crisis, I think that’s the case, and if it’s a close second with Ukip on our tail it will also be uncomfortable.” He insisted neither result would dislodge Cameron. “He’s going to be there till the next election, but the simple truth is that it will make things more uncomfortable in the House of Commons.” Nick Clegg, campaigning in Eastleigh, insisted the Lib Dems were on the “cusp of a great, great victory” for their candidate, local councillor Mike Thornton.

Will Eastleigh be beastly for PM? David Cameron warned of “crisis” if Tories come third (Mirror)
David Cameron has been warned his leadership will be thrown into “crisis” if the Tories are trounced in today’s Eastleigh by-election. The party has been rocked by a late UKIP surge in the bitterly fought contest. The Lib Dems now look set to retain the seat despite the departure of shamed MP Chris Huhne, caused the by-election by quitting.

However, let’s also be wary of reading too much into a by-election of how ‘the voters’ (as if they are a single bloc!) think about politics, as Matthew d’Ancona astutely pointed out:

Eastleigh will be won on local issues not national politics
In the words of one Lib-Dem Cabinet minister, the next general election will be “650 by-elections”. Whoever wins tomorrow, the lesson of this battle is already clear. The result will not really be a verdict on Osborne’s Plan A, or the sexual morality of the Lib-Dems, or Ed Miliband’s latest performance at PMQs. The Eastleigh contest has shown that, in every sense, the future of politics is local. The path to power passes straight through the gravel pit.

But what about Ukip?

Michael Crick’s speculative tweet on Tuesday has triggered predictions of a huge potential upset…

…with his Channel 4 colleague Gary Gibbon writing:

Eastleigh could yet turn out to be an anti-establishment voter outburst, a home counties version of the Bradford West by-election last year that saw George Galloway returned to parliament.

This has got short shrift from the Telegraph’s Tom Chivers, who constructed his own ‘poll of polls’ conducted during the campaign:

Eastleigh by-election: sorry, but Ukip aren’t going to win
The Lib Dems and the Tories average out on 32.4 per cent and 31.2 per cent respectively. That actually is too close to call with confidence, especially using the shoddy jerry-built approach to statistics I’ve been using here. But, and I’m sorry to be boring, that shoddy jerry-built approach is easily good enough to say that Ukip almost certainly aren’t going to win. This isn’t an anti-Ukip thing, I promise (for that, go here). It’s just a reminder that while “taking the temperature” of a constituency by getting down on the ground and meeting real people and generally doing the old-school political thing is a good starting point, it isn’t as useful an indicator as actual polls. Of course, if Ukip go on and win this now, I’ll look pretty bloody silly, but that’s the risk you take.

Although one of the pollsters, Survation, is hedging its bets a bit:

UKIP are within touching distance of second place, and with reports from Eastleigh suggesting their ground game has been surprisingly organised, it is conceivable that they will pass at least one of the two main parties by polling day.

Survation also shrewdly notes the importance of postal votes in this campaign:

The large number of expected postal votes may also give the Lib Dems an advantage, enabling their superior ground game to ‘lock in’ a large number of votes before polling day. 14,267 postal votes have been issued in this by-election, up from 12,644 in 2010, and nearly two thirds of them have already been returned. This high proportion of postal ballots also reduces the chance for last minute events to influence the outcome of the election.

And finally…

Speaking of bets, here are the latest odds:

This is the tenth and final round-up of news from Eastleigh:

And you can read my Co-Editor Mark Pack’s rounds-up on his site here.

* Stephen was Editor (and Co-Editor) of Liberal Democrat Voice from 2007 to 2015, and writes at The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Parliamentary by-elections.
Advert

8 Comments

  • The Tory vot e has been split into two by UKIP, if the LibDems don’t get a decent majority after all the work they have put into this by-election it will be a very poor result – a defeat would be a disaster and Clegg would be finished. My guess is a LibDem majority of about 4,000 which given all the circumstances would be satisfactory.

  • Peter Watson 28th Feb '13 - 11:58am

    Anybody want to speculate on the result and what it will mean while it’s still hypothetical and fun?
    For what it’s worth, my money’s on all four main parties losing. And winning. Sort of.
    Lib Dem holding seat on reduced share. Labour coming 4th on increased share.
    Each party will be able to wheel out somebody who, with some justification, will say “This is the sort of seat where that other party really should be doing much better.”. I expect to hear and read the words “mid-term blues”, “protest vote”, “tactical” and “Lib Dems always do worse between general elections”. Could be quite boring despite all of the hype.
    Of course, UKIP winning would be exciting so if I lived there I’d be tempted to cast a mischievous tactical vote in that direction.

  • I’m up for a bit of speculation. I think the LDs will win by a very small margin. I did initially think that the Tories would win it but that was assuming they put up a half decent candidate. I think the LD tactical and disaffected voters that switch to Labour will almost be cancelled out by the reactionary wing of Labour voters that switch to UKIP. So, a marginal LD win on a reduced share of the vote with Labour probably in 4th place with a slightly higher share thanks to some of their voters switching to UKIP (putting them in 3rd place). Pretty much the uninteresting result I think you described, Peter Watson. I also agree with your prediction for the post-election commentary. Worth staying in bed for.

  • Good luck, I’m beginning to think you’ll edge it. The Tories need a win and if they don’t get one it will cause them problems. UKIP coming third will mean a lot of sturm and drang from the Right, but i still think they miss the point UKIP are a protest vote and just natural Tories.

  • Although UKIP winning or snatching second and then watching the Tories and Cameron spontenously combust would be the (second) best possible result, not to mention the most entertaining….

  • I predict the Coalition will lose. Miliband will take a little bit of knock but will be happy to see Cameron get a stonking great punch to the nose. From a strategic point of view Miliband will be the winner.

    The immature part of me hopes UKIP will come second so I can enjoy the spectacle of the Tories tearing themselves to bits. Of course Cameron will say to his right wing that losing with a semi-detached Ukipper style candidate just shows that leaning in their direction would be folly. Will that fly? No. Those people take a pretty frosty attitude to reality.

  • Yes ok, I’ll bite. I predict that the Lib Dems will win by the same majority as previously. They may even increase their majority. The recent press coverage will help the Lib Dems as voters will want to support the under-dog, being criticised on all sides, especially by the ‘feral press’. Nick Clegg’s performance will be seen as endearingly human rather than nefarious. Not least, the citizens of Eastleigh seem perfectly happy with the way Lib Dems run things locally so I can’t see them jeopardising that by voting for Maria Hutchens or the UKIP lady.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Dave Tate
    The only way to tackle the housing/homelessness crisis is by building new homes that meets the country's changing demographics. This is a political question tha...
  • David Evans
    Hi Chris (Moore) When you say "Tbh, David, I personally wouldn’t mind being called a “born Jeremiah” as I would regard it as obviously friendly humour,...
  • Freddie
    @Steve N and @Tim L - you are both right re: the data. I’m sorry to say it seems my source is dodgy. Like Kuenssberg, this is embarrassing and disappointing....
  • Peter Martin
    "Israel stands as the sole democracy in the region........ Joshua Leifer, writing in the Guardian, below, argues that it isn't. .... sha...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Who might benefit from the accommodation problem? Why might we not get data on this problem, and on the use of food banks, with the frequency and prominence ...