Ed Davey: Britain must lead on defence AND aid

In an email to Party members, Ed Davey set out his support for the Prime Minister’s plans to raise defence spending – though he urged him to go faster and to get all-party talks going to work out how. However, he criticised the fact that it was being funded from the international aid budget.  The Liberal Democrats have long championed international aid and it was our Michael Moore who successfully enshrined the previous 0.7% target in law back in 2015.

Watch Ed’s reaction to the Prime Minister’s statement yesterday:

Ed said in his email:

Today, the Prime Minister did what we’ve been urging him to do for years: commit to increasing Britain’s defence spending to 2.5% of GDP.

That is essential. With Vladimir Putin waging war on our continent, and Donald Trump in the White House cosying up to him, this is the most perilous moment for Europe in my lifetime.

Trump is threatening not only to betray the brave Ukrainian people, who have heroically resisted Putin’s war machine for the past three years, but also to undermine peace and security across Europe – including here in the UK.

In the face of that threat, the UK must step up and lead in Europe – and that has to include a big boost to defence spending. Today I urged the Prime Minister to go even further and bring all parties together to get to 3% of GDP as soon as possible.

But while we agree with the Government on the urgent need to spend more on defence, we have a clear difference of opinion on how to fund it. We have set out a clear plan to raise that money by increasing the Digital Services Tax on the profits of social media firms and other tech giants.

But Labour – along with the Conservatives and Reform – say it should instead be paid for by cutting international development spending. That is a big mistake.

The Conservatives already cut back on international aid when they were in power, and that did enormous damage to the UK’s soft power around the world. Deeper cuts now – at the same time as Donald Trump and Elon Musk are gutting America’s aid programmes – will only leave a vacuum for Russia and China to fill, strengthening the hand of authoritarian regimes and further undermining our security.

I am immensely proud that the Liberal Democrats have led the way on both defence and international development. It was we who enshrined the 0.7% of national income target in law. And that aid has been transformative for millions of people in poverty and hunger. It has helped to tackle the spread of disease, and counter the harmful impacts of climate change.

At this time of great conflict and instability, the UK needs to strengthen both our Armed Forces and our soft power, including international aid. With your support, that is what the Liberal Democrats will keep fighting for.

It was deeply depressing to see Starmer buckle to the Reform/right wing agenda and target international aid. I know he said he was sad to do it, and I believe him,  but I totally agree with Ed that we can meet the challenges that Donald Trump is throwing our way without damaging our national security by depriving the most vulnerable people in the world of education, food, shelter and health care.

 

 

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Jim Forrest 27th Feb '25 - 9:51am

    Enacting the 0.7% target was for me the main achievement that made the agonies of the Coalition worthwhile. It’s not just benevolence, it’s well-directed self-interest. We’ll never reduce famine, conflict and other causes of forced migration without helping poorer countries to find solutions. Ed has restored my pride in the Liberal Democrats by standing up to the ignorant and the mean-spirited. And his proposed source of funding for the necesssary increase in defence spending shows some savvy, taxing the digital froth in our personal spending rather than the4 essentials.

  • Peter Hirst 8th Mar '25 - 1:27pm

    While increasing our defence budget, it is also important to review the details of our ability to deliver our nuclear deterrent following news from the White House. As I understand it we depend on America to be able to possess a credible nuclear deterrent, which is the basis for our our nuclear submarines and weapon systems. If it becomes possible that the USA is no longer a reliable partner in this endeavour then we should conduct an urgent review of its future deployment.

  • Jenny Barnes 8th Mar '25 - 4:45pm

    Our nuclear deterrent is dependent on US missiles, stored in the US but we own them – I believe around 50. In the event of a complete rupture with the USA we might not be able to access them, and would depend on those already loaded in the subs. Similarly our aircraft carriers can only operate US supplied F35Bs. It is entirely possible that in the complicated software of these aircraft is a remote kill switch. So we could be left with no nuclear deterrent, and no aircraft carriers that are any use. Whether they are a good idea anyway is another discussion, ofc.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Chloe
    'The truth is that our freedoms are being subtly eroded in an era where emotion and sentiment are prized above reason and rationality'... KB...
  • David Allen
    "Starmer failed to communicate the home truths that the country needs to be told. Over promising led to under delivery." This doesn't quite cut it. One, bec...
  • Nonconformistradical
    "which is more than I can say for Ms Badenoch who was shrill and cheap in her remarks" I can't recall ever being impressed with anything she has said......
  • Chloe
    After Burnhams arrival at Westminster hall on a Donkey - given the adulation he received, maybe he's tired from such a long journey. As for Phillipson, she des...
  • David Raw
    Watched P.M.Q.'s today. Thought Sir Keir Starmer handled it well with great dignity - which is more than I can say for Ms Badenoch who was shrill and cheap in h...