Will Ed Miliband “do a John Smith” and push for an early EU in/out referendum? There are advantages, y’know…

John Major and David CameronCould Labour be about to “do a John Smith” to the Tories over the timing of an in/out referendum on the UK’s membership of the European Union?

In the 1990s, Labour wrought havoc on the fourth-term Tory government by (cynically) teaming up with the right-wing ‘Maastricht rebels’ to inflict damaging Commons defeats on their common enemy, John Major.

Could Ed Miliband try and do the same to David Cameron? That’s the hint in today’s Guardian:

Labour is considering backing an in-out referendum on Europe as early as its autumn party conference. Sources say the shadow cabinet has been considering a range of options, including backing a “clear the air” referendum on Britain’s membership to be staged either before the 2015 general election or six months after it.

The party is even looking at the option of tabling amendments to the upcoming private member’s bill on an EU referendum in 2017, being promoted by the Conservative MP James Wharton.

The Labour amendment would propose a pre-2015 date for the referendum, which would place some Tory MPs in a dilemma over whether or not to stick with the Conservative leadership’s position that no referendum should be held until the outcome of negotiations with EU partners on the terms of UK membership some time in 2017. A referendum could be staged on the same day as the European parliamentary elections on 22 May next year. …

Labour sources said it was unclear how the leader would resolve the debate but a decision may come in the early autumn, possibly at the party conference, leaving enough time to back an amendment to the Wharton bill.

It is also acknowledged that the Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg has already shifted his ground by saying the referendum is a matter of “when rather than if”, so risking Labour being the only party not to support a referendum at the next election. Labour has said it would abstain on the Wharton bill next week.

My view on this hasn’t changed. As I’ve argued before, I think the Lib Dems should stick with the strategy Paddy Ashdown chose during the Masstrict wrangles: national interest ahead of party interest.

I’ve no problems with an in/out referendum. I just don’t think now’s the time. Partly because there are more pressing issues facing this country, such as our flatlining economy. Partly because we’ve no idea what we’d be saying yes or no to at the moment: whether the Eurozone crisis will resolve itself, and in what way, won’t be known until well past the other side of Germany’s federal election in September.

However, there are two advantages to a referendum being staged this side of the UK’s 2015 general election.

First, the tactical one deployed by John Smith: watching the Tories tear lumps out of each other as they decide whether to stick with David Cameron’s promise of a referendum in 2017, or risk finding themselves out-flanked by Labour’s promise of a referendum ASAP.

And secondly, the strategic advantage: David Cameron is, as I’ve noted before, the best and possibly only person able to lead a Yes campaign to victory — because he’ll most likely be the last Tory leader for a while who isn’t a signed-up better-off-outer. A referendum before 2015 would at least save me from having to vote Tory at the next general election to be sure of the UK remaining within the EU.

* Stephen was Editor (and Co-Editor) of Liberal Democrat Voice from 2007 to 2015, and writes at The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about , , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • This is a difficult one and I can see where there are advantages to either option.

    I am inherently pro-Europe but not necessarily happy with everything done in its name and have come to accept that. however stupid I think it is, at some point there will need to be a referendum. All parties seem to be moving this way so the timing for me is when is the best time to give the Europe I would like.

    The parts of Europe I like, worker protection, HSE legislation etc are not something the Tories want and I do worry that if by a miracle they win the next election Cameron will go to in trying to get rid the bits I like. In this case do I vote in/out or is there and ‘in but don’t think much of your renegotiation’.

    By voting before 2017 it gives more chance of a no but would clear the air (for a short while)

    Tactically, it is possibly a smart move by Labour – if we are going to have a referendum then why not do it when it causes us the most benefit. Selfish but politics is a nasty game.

    If the criticism comes back about playing politics etc, etc. then it is difficult to defend when we have just seen that smoke and mirrors spending review by the most political chancellor I remember (abetted by a prominent LD) that has been done with electoral politics very much at its heart

  • I suppose we can be grateful that UKIP is working as intended, by dislodging the Westminster backside off of the ballot box.

  • Would an in/out referendum have any real impact on the extent to which the UK is subject to the EU-US trade deal?

    I ask because this is due to be signed in 2014 and thanks to those in the EU who are concerned about democracy and the excessive use of secrecy within the EU to prevent proper scrutiny, we are learning that the agreement is likely to enshrine corporate interests and enable them to override public interest, democracy and sovereignty/local laws in what has been labelled as a “race to the bottom of the Atlantic” along with a corporate litigation boom…

  • How about a unilateral moratorium on recycling photos taken at funerals in political articles?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Roland
    Re 2008 financial crash… We should not overlook the role the Conservatives played, by making the UK economy overly dependent upon financial services, resul...
  • Martin Gray
    'Sunak fits well into the neocon mould of Meloni, Farage and Trump – Politicians who believe their own evil myths of Western triumphalism and denialism, who a...
  • Peter Martin
    @ David Allen, " Like Scholz in Germany, {Starmer} risks becoming paralysed by his lack of ambition. But what’s the alternative?" As this is ...
  • Peter Martin
    @ David Allen, " Like Scholz in Germany, {Starmer} risks becoming paralysed by his lack of ambition. But what’s the alternative?" As this is ...
  • Peter Martin
    "I know perfectly well the financial crash in 2008 was not NL’s responsibility." It was mainly the result of what happened in America but it was...