Electoral reform news: peers don’t like democracy, but Labour candidate who lost on vote transfers backs AV

From The Independent:

Clegg: peers are holding Government hostage…

In acrimonious clashes, they warned the Deputy Prime Minister that they would fight his proposals every step of the way…

The show-down – described by one participant as “Daniel in the lion’s den” – came at a meeting between Clegg and members of a cross-party group campaigning against the plans. More than 50 peers from all major parties were present, including the former Liberal leader Lord Steel of Aikwood.

Shock news there, that peers who are against elections are against plans to introduce elections – though the presence of David Steel is disappointing.

Meanwhile, the BBC has the news of Labour’s former Mayor candidate in Stoke, who would have won under first past the post but even so is supporting the alternative vote:

In 2002 the Labour favourite George Stevenson lost out on becoming directly elected mayor by 314 votes – despite winning the most first votes…

The system he lost out on was called Supplementary Vote, which differs to AV in only allowing the top two candidates to reach a second round.

Speaking from his home near Alicante, former Stoke-on-Trent South MP Mr Stevenson said AV was a fairer version of the current system.

He said: “What we failed to understand is we should campaign for second preference. We, as politicians, have to change the way we approach the electoral process.

“[AV] gives you an opportunity to come in contact with a wider cross-section of society.”

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

10 Comments

  • Depressed Ex Lib Dem 15th Jan '11 - 1:51pm

    “The Cabinet is expected to back moves to create an upper chamber that is 80 per cent elected, although some coalition ministers want to go further and make it fully elected.”

    80% elected. Sounds like another issue on which the coalition has “compromised” by …………… adopting the Tory policy!

  • @Depressed Ex Lib Dem

    I’m pretty sure that the Tories don’t want an elected Lords at all.

  • Depressed Ex Lib Dem 15th Jan '11 - 3:05pm

    “I’m pretty sure that the Tories don’t want an elected Lords at all.”

    Not being telepathic, I couldn’t comment on that. But a “mainly-elected second chamber” was in the Conservative manifesto, and in the last parliament Cameron voted in favour of 80% being elected.

  • “peers don’t like democracy”

    At least one is quoted asking for a referendum. This was in the Labour manifesto and a positive result would have given Clegg the mandate to proceed. I firmly believe in a democratic upper chamber and would certainly vote yes. I do understand some peoples concerns at experience and talent that could be lost and therefore believe there are arguments for the chamber to include non-voting experts to work or advise at committee stages etc.

  • Depressed Ex Lib Dem 15th Jan '11 - 8:21pm

    So the argument is that agreeing to the Tory policy is OK as a “compromise” because you don’t think they really meant it? Is it any wonder that the party doesn’t come across as robust enough in its negotiations with the Tories?

  • Tony Greaves 15th Jan '11 - 10:45pm

    A wholly or mainly elected Upper House has been Liberal Democrat policy for a long time.

    Tony Greaves (who last time round voted for 100% and nothing else).

  • Depressed Ex Lib Dem 16th Jan '11 - 12:18am

    George

    Gee, thanks, but really the last thing I wanted to hear was that the Lib Dem policy would be very difficult to implement, so you’d be really happy if the Tory policy was implemented instead. Talk about “not getting it” …

  • Any other LibDem peers (apart from Steel) involved in this shameful campaign?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJo Hayes 23rd Feb - 4:36am
    Defending their values is hard mental work that involves playing fast and loose with the law of the land and cherrypicking facts or dismissing inconvenient...
  • User AvatarPaul Fisher 23rd Feb - 12:43am
    As usual Paul Reynolds is "on the money"! I am afraid MALC that the UK propaganda machine has hijacked your worl (European) view. Check out...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 22nd Feb - 11:39pm
    David It was a post by me, on behalf of the team. I happily stand by it. It’s an attractive PPB. I thought the narration...
  • User AvatarTynan 22nd Feb - 10:19pm
    @Mary Reid, whilst not specifically about gay marriage there is some evidence that suggests that opinions towards homosexuality in the capital differ to those of...
  • User AvatarRodney Watts 22nd Feb - 9:19pm
    @Miranda Pinch. An excellent comment on some flawed thinking, and so glad it came from a like- minded Jewish LD. Whilst we appreciate Lorenzo’s concern...
  • User AvatarRob Heale 22nd Feb - 9:14pm
    Social Liberals have supported the ideas of "co-determination" and "co-ownership" for decades. Lets hope that Liberal Democrats can develop these ideas to help give employees...