Emergency Commons debate after Lib Dem MP John Hemming “intimidated” by solicitors

The BBC reports:

Commons Speaker John Bercow has granted MPs an emergency debate after one Member claimed he had been “intimidated” by a firm of solicitors.

Liberal Democrat John Hemming, who represents Birmingham Yardley, complained about an e-mail he had received from Withers LLP.

Mr Bercow said the MP believed it amounted to a “contempt of the House” and ordered a debate for Thursday. It was a matter “to which I should allow precedence”, he told the Commons.

Full story here.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Parliament.
Advert

4 Comments

  • While I think parl privilidge is a good thing, it needs to be self regulating and very carefully and sparingly used. I do get the impression that john threatens to use it a little bit too regularly for my liking. I seem to remember he threatened to name individual social workers involved in a case in the house.

  • Malcolm Todd 14th Jan '10 - 11:04am

    According to the BBC story, the offending email was “dated 4 August 2009”. How does this become a matter of an emergency debate in January? Has John Hemming just checked his last six months’ emails?

  • I am struggling with the concept of John being intimidated….. 🙂

    Although like Anon I am wary of Parliamentary privilege being regarded as an ultimate trump card. It is an old and important value.

    However the Trafigura incident (however badly handled) was about whether legally privileged documents should be kept confidential (whether they were legally privileged was a matter for a future hearing at the time). That is also a pretty old and important value.

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • John Bicknell
    Bit of a depressing article on the BBC website today, focusing on the views of some LD MPs that the party lacks relevance and cut-through. Looking at the HYS c...
  • Tim
    I think, although I may be wrong, that you are calling for higher taxes now, so that we leave less debt to the next generation. That might be less financial deb...
  • David Raw
    @ Gwyn Williams, Gwyn, you write, "The urgent issues of change in Westminster such as PR"............. Sorry, Gwyn, but I would have thought that a 26.4% inc...
  • Richard Cripps
    Having been "attacked" on social media for my political and social views (I am normally a LD voter) from time to time - with the attacks being personal rather t...
  • Jana
    @Tim Roger’s “ Jana. Please do not assume that everybody in the party is pro trans. Just oppose violence towards them.” I know you are correct on this...