Emergency Commons debate after Lib Dem MP John Hemming “intimidated” by solicitors

The BBC reports:

Commons Speaker John Bercow has granted MPs an emergency debate after one Member claimed he had been “intimidated” by a firm of solicitors.

Liberal Democrat John Hemming, who represents Birmingham Yardley, complained about an e-mail he had received from Withers LLP.

Mr Bercow said the MP believed it amounted to a “contempt of the House” and ordered a debate for Thursday. It was a matter “to which I should allow precedence”, he told the Commons.

Full story here.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Parliament.
Advert

4 Comments

  • While I think parl privilidge is a good thing, it needs to be self regulating and very carefully and sparingly used. I do get the impression that john threatens to use it a little bit too regularly for my liking. I seem to remember he threatened to name individual social workers involved in a case in the house.

  • Malcolm Todd 14th Jan '10 - 11:04am

    According to the BBC story, the offending email was “dated 4 August 2009”. How does this become a matter of an emergency debate in January? Has John Hemming just checked his last six months’ emails?

  • I am struggling with the concept of John being intimidated….. 🙂

    Although like Anon I am wary of Parliamentary privilege being regarded as an ultimate trump card. It is an old and important value.

    However the Trafigura incident (however badly handled) was about whether legally privileged documents should be kept confidential (whether they were legally privileged was a matter for a future hearing at the time). That is also a pretty old and important value.

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Laurence Cox
    @Mel Borthwaite, This is essentially the same criticism I made of GBI before the conference in response to Kevin Langford's article in LDV https://www.li...
  • Jason Connor
    Does financial incentives mean bribes? I hope not. Cycling units have been installed on council estates and blocks near me and are barely used. Perhaps because ...
  • Sam Barratt
    It is great to read your experience Luke! I hope it encourages those who are able to consider donating to the access fund to do so (https://libdems.secure.force...
  • Thomas Prince
    @Mark Johnston - I think that Guardian article is a good reflection of the positives and negatives of the speech. Some good lines; some topics tackled; but litt...
  • Thomas Prince
    @James Belchamber: I've written an alternative speech that doesn't shy away from Europe and includes Swinson's most famous slogan (epitaph?). But I think the to...