New figures show over a third of councils are failing in the fight against electoral fraud

New figures published today by the Electoral Commission show that over a third of local councils are failing to meet the standards laid down to ensure the integrity of the electoral register and postal voting process.

Today’s figures are the first time the Electoral Commission has published detailed records of how Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) across Great Britain are performing against recently introduced performance standards. The ten standards cover a wide range of their work, including the completeness and accuracy of the electoral register, publicising the registration process to the public and overall planning and organisation.

Although in many areas the 404 EROs do well at meeting or exceeding the standards, 37% fail to meet the standard for ensuring the integrity of the electoral registration and postal voting systems and 66% fail to meet the standard for raising public awareness about electoral registration.

Some councils even admitted that they do not keep electoral registration forms for the life of the electoral register and/or do not keep postal and proxy vote application forms until the application is canceled or expires. This means that if an allegation of electoral corruption is subsequently made, key evidence will not be available because it has been binned. This binning of potential evidence happens despite original application forms having been a key source of forensic evidence in several cases in recent years.

Although some councils failed the integrity standard overall only because they have not documented their procedures properly, this failure to keep evidence that may be required by a police investigation is very worrying.

Complaints about the performances of EROs are nothing new, and by bringing to light both the good and the bad the standards should help improve the registration system in the future. But welcome as the standards are, they also highlight how much work there is to be done in some areas.

Further details are available at www.electoralcommission.org.uk/performance-standards.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarArnold Kiel 20th Feb - 4:06am
    Sean Hagan, I have not anywhere in any way expressed disdain for unprepared voters, just their abusers. David Raw: "Your comment is breathtakingly elitist and...
  • User AvatarIan Martin 20th Feb - 3:40am
    matt "she must have had Bangladeshi dual nationality" It is a question that she has Bangladesh nationality now and this will come before a British...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 20th Feb - 12:05am
    Surely the immediate question is whether some or all of the Gang of Seven (>Eight) can be brought to support Liberal Democrat positions in the...
  • User AvatarIan Patterson 19th Feb - 11:12pm
    At present atrophy rate we will be exceeded as fourth Commons party by weekend!
  • User AvatarMichael 1 19th Feb - 11:11pm
    Of interest is the sky data poll which has: Con 32% Lab 26% Ind Group 10% Lib Dems 9% UKIP 6% Compared to the Survation...
  • User AvatarGraham Evans 19th Feb - 11:01pm
    @ Denis Mollison You have to read AAV with a pitch of salt. Like NBN, it's a left wing blog which frequently distorts the reporting...