First two Lib Dem presidential hopefuls declare themselves

Party president Tim Farron’s second (and non-renewable) term of office finishes at the end of this year, after four years in the role. He doubtless expected most of the challenges that come from the Lib Dems being in coalition with the Conservatives. He wouldn’t have expected to have to manage the fall-out from the allegations of sexual impropriety made against Lord Rennard a year ago.

The post of party president is the only Lib Dem role other than that of leader elected through an all-member ballot, and it will take place this autumn. This mandate (along with the requirement to deal with the unexpected) makes it a high-profile position within the party. For the ambitious it can be a way of putting down a marker for future leadership ambitions. For others the role itself is reward enough. Tim Farron, I think, combined both outlooks.

Because it’s an all-member ballot, existing profile counts for a lot. Put simply, if you’re not a well-known face you need to start campaigning early if you’re to have any hope of winning a contested election. So it’s no surprise that the jockeying has begun at Spring Conference, with two candidates openly declaring their intention to stand.

sal for presidentIn alphabetical order, we have:

Baroness (Sal) Brinton, a Lib Dem peer since 2011 (currently Lib Dem health spokeswoman in the Lords), having stood to be elected as an MP in the previous four elections, including Watford in both 2005 and 2010. She was previously a Cambridgeshire County Councillor from 1993 to 2004. Sal is a member of the party’s Federal Policy Committee and Vice Chair of its Federal Conference Committee. She was named this week as one of the party’s five-strong team preparing for ‘hung parliament’ negotiations.

pauline pearcePauline Pearce, AKA ‘Lady P’, the ‘Hackney Heroine’ of the 2011 riots, who stood for the Lib Dems in Hackney Central in the 2012 local elections. She explained her reasoning in this Guardian article, After the riots, the Liberal Democrats stood by me: “The Lib Dems promote opportunities amongst the disenfranchised, and this is crucial to people living in poor communities, like mine, many of whom only know of criminogenic lifestyles.”

I expect others will come forward, looking for the 200 nominations they need from conference representatives of at least 20 local parties. Given the dominance of white men in the party leadership – our leader, deputy leader, party president and all cabinet ministers – I’d be surprised if Lib Dem members didn’t choose a party president who breaks that pattern.

What do we, the party membership, want from our party president? That’s the question Mark Valladares posed at the beginning of the year: 2014 – looking for a dark horse, or a safe pair of hands? Here were the key skills he listed – and of course Mark has something of an inside track, given he’s married to a former party president, Baroness (Ros) Scott:

Resilience would be my first choice. Most Liberal Democrats, along with most commentators, expect a loss of seats. The successful applicant will need to be able to explain why it isn’t an utter catastrophe in such a way that members believe it. If the result is bad enough, they may need to preside over a leadership contest – it might be better if they weren’t a potential candidate themselves.

Management skills would be my second choice. The ability to work with the Chief Executive and with Federal Executive to run the professional and voluntary parties will be critical, although losing our place in Government will be balanced by an increase in Short and Cranborne money. Federal Executive is likely to be fractious, so the Party needs a diplomat, someone who can keep it on track.

* Stephen was Editor (and Co-Editor) of Liberal Democrat Voice from 2007 to 2015, and writes at The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Party Presidency.
Advert

8 Comments

  • paul barker 8th Mar '14 - 11:10am

    On the key skills needed, I would add flexibility. We are all prepared to do badly but what if we dont ? We need someone who can move fast.

  • Why can’t Tim just continue? Don’t like having a limit on the amount of time a person can serve as President. Ridiculous in fact. How do we change this?

  • @Hannah, agree that Tim has done a wonderful job. Would he want to continue? What if we have a fresh leadership election? Given that our MPs declined to elect a female Deputy Leader, I really would like to see a female president … I recognize this that this could be tough in the good male candidates out there though.

  • Sal is very sound and would do a great job.

  • Phil Rimmer 9th Mar '14 - 8:41pm

    Gut reaction – wouldn’t the Party President also serving on any coalition negotiating committee be a potential conflict of interest. I would expect the President to take a step back from that.

  • Simon Banks 10th Mar '14 - 8:06pm

    I agree with Phil. It’s not impossible, but if the President is not on the negotiating team, (s)he could play an important role in conveying to the team disquiet in the party as a whole, for example. Clearly a President who’s on the team can’t do that.

    A vital skill, surely, is being a good listener, or how can the President be a sounding board? It’s also an advantage to have a President who can motivate and inspire the troops, especially with a leader whose appeal is rational and low-key rather than passionate and visceral.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

    No recent comment found.