Flight cancelled or delayed? Reasons to be thankful for EU Regulation 261/2004

While the Westminster Village is fixated by the Telegraph-hyped furore that Lib Dem ministers don’t always agree with every aspect of Coalition policy (shock, horror etc), the rest of the country is focused on a British obsession bigger even than the media’s predeliction for attaching the suffix ‘-gate’ to a noun: the weather.

Newspaper and TV pictures have been dominated by images of those hoping for a holiday getaway having their hopes dashed and their tempers frayed by the endless queues and chaos at Heathrow and for the Eurostar. Hundreds of thousands of people who had hoped for family reunions or dream holidays now find their plans in tatters. If there’s a part of the year that’s pretty time-critical it’s Christmas — somehow arriving after the festivities misses the point.

There is at least one consolation, and it’s courtesy of the European Union, specifically Regulation 261/2004. I doubt you’ll hear the right-wing media mention it — though you can be sure they’d condemn the EU if it didn’t exist.

Regulation 261/2004 (passed on 11 February, 2004) “established common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding, cancellation, long delay of flights”. Though the severity of this past week’s weather almost certainly means that passengers will not be entitled to the normal EU compensation available for cancelled flights, it does offer considerable consumer reassurance — for example, a guarantee backed by legislation that the airline must offer passengers the choice of a refund for the parts of the ticket they’ve not used, or an alternative route or travelling on a later date.

The legislation also legally obliges airlines — regardless of the reasons for cancellation — to offer assistance to passengers affected by cancelled flights at the airport, including meals and refreshments in reasonable relation to the amount of time they are delayed; two free telephone calls or emails; and overnight hotel accommodation and transfers.

Of course, even if your flight isn’t covered by EU legislation you still have a contract (ie, your ticket) with the airline to get you from A to B. The airline should — if it is following the International Air Transport Association’s ‘Recommended Practice on General Conditions of Carriage’ — offer you the choice of a later flight, an agreed alternative mode of transport or a refund. Most airlines do, but they are not legally obliged to do so. And certainly there is no right to assistance, or to compensation in the event of cancellation owing to non-exceptional circumstances.

So there you have it — a real-life example of the EU offering consumer protection of value to its citizens. Just don’t expact the right-wing media to mention it.

Plebble.com has some very useful information on consumer rights here, and a template letter to airlines to request a refund and/or compensation here.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Europe / International and News.
Advert

7 Comments

  • @Jock

    How is obliging worse airlines to recompensate their customers in any way protecting them from competition? What I see is consumer rights being maintained and I’m under no doubt that this is exactly the kind of thing which would never become a standard level of service were it not legislated for.

    Have you ever flown RyanAir? I think it’s safe to say that you have to be pretty damn terrible to lose out on the airline market because of poor customer service if your airline is also cheap.

  • I would be interested to know whether the weather we have had, constitutes extraordinary circumstances that could not have been avoided by any reasonable measure.

    Jim

  • All the sensible consumer legislation comes from the EU. The London government and civil service just can’t be bothered with it at all.

  • There is at least one consolation, and it’s courtesy of the European Union, specifically Regulation 261/2004.

    If we want a regulation, our own government can write it. If we want NOT to have a regulation, or would prefer a different regulation, we gain nothing from having the EU force its ideas on us.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 19th Oct - 5:40pm
    Bernard that is excellent, use this ability to engage more again, though some of your posts seem very specific t the Dutch experience in the...
  • User AvatarSteve Trevethan 19th Oct - 5:03pm
    Perhaps most, if not all, particular instances are connected to general or universal principles? The disappearance of Mr Kashoggi is connected to the vital principle...
  • User AvatarMichael 1 19th Oct - 4:41pm
    To complete the round-up - in a rare Northern Ireland by-election the DUP gained Carrick Castle ward from an independent DUP 38.8 +11.6 UUP 23.4...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 19th Oct - 4:25pm
    @ expats I agree. Sir John Vincent Cable (75) is old enough to know better. I'm afraid the sureness of touch of the Mr. Bean...
  • User AvatarDavid Evershed 19th Oct - 4:23pm
    Strange that in Iffley the Lib Dem candidate should be supporting a very radical left wing anti business Green Party to help them beat the...
  • User AvatarBernard Aris 19th Oct - 3:32pm
    First point: although almost all Dutch parties (Geert Wilders and Thierry Baudet couldn't be bothered; they don't care about the British) profess they want the...