Flight cancelled or delayed? Reasons to be thankful for EU Regulation 261/2004

While the Westminster Village is fixated by the Telegraph-hyped furore that Lib Dem ministers don’t always agree with every aspect of Coalition policy (shock, horror etc), the rest of the country is focused on a British obsession bigger even than the media’s predeliction for attaching the suffix ‘-gate’ to a noun: the weather.

Newspaper and TV pictures have been dominated by images of those hoping for a holiday getaway having their hopes dashed and their tempers frayed by the endless queues and chaos at Heathrow and for the Eurostar. Hundreds of thousands of people who had hoped for family reunions or dream holidays now find their plans in tatters. If there’s a part of the year that’s pretty time-critical it’s Christmas — somehow arriving after the festivities misses the point.

There is at least one consolation, and it’s courtesy of the European Union, specifically Regulation 261/2004. I doubt you’ll hear the right-wing media mention it — though you can be sure they’d condemn the EU if it didn’t exist.

Regulation 261/2004 (passed on 11 February, 2004) “established common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding, cancellation, long delay of flights”. Though the severity of this past week’s weather almost certainly means that passengers will not be entitled to the normal EU compensation available for cancelled flights, it does offer considerable consumer reassurance — for example, a guarantee backed by legislation that the airline must offer passengers the choice of a refund for the parts of the ticket they’ve not used, or an alternative route or travelling on a later date.

The legislation also legally obliges airlines — regardless of the reasons for cancellation — to offer assistance to passengers affected by cancelled flights at the airport, including meals and refreshments in reasonable relation to the amount of time they are delayed; two free telephone calls or emails; and overnight hotel accommodation and transfers.

Of course, even if your flight isn’t covered by EU legislation you still have a contract (ie, your ticket) with the airline to get you from A to B. The airline should — if it is following the International Air Transport Association’s ‘Recommended Practice on General Conditions of Carriage’ — offer you the choice of a later flight, an agreed alternative mode of transport or a refund. Most airlines do, but they are not legally obliged to do so. And certainly there is no right to assistance, or to compensation in the event of cancellation owing to non-exceptional circumstances.

So there you have it — a real-life example of the EU offering consumer protection of value to its citizens. Just don’t expact the right-wing media to mention it.

Plebble.com has some very useful information on consumer rights here, and a template letter to airlines to request a refund and/or compensation here.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Europe / International and News.


  • @Jock

    How is obliging worse airlines to recompensate their customers in any way protecting them from competition? What I see is consumer rights being maintained and I’m under no doubt that this is exactly the kind of thing which would never become a standard level of service were it not legislated for.

    Have you ever flown RyanAir? I think it’s safe to say that you have to be pretty damn terrible to lose out on the airline market because of poor customer service if your airline is also cheap.

  • I would be interested to know whether the weather we have had, constitutes extraordinary circumstances that could not have been avoided by any reasonable measure.


  • All the sensible consumer legislation comes from the EU. The London government and civil service just can’t be bothered with it at all.

  • There is at least one consolation, and it’s courtesy of the European Union, specifically Regulation 261/2004.

    If we want a regulation, our own government can write it. If we want NOT to have a regulation, or would prefer a different regulation, we gain nothing from having the EU force its ideas on us.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 6th Jun - 12:04am
    @Peter Martin: The practice among Labour hard lefties of constantly digging up the increasinly distant past in priority to attacking the current government is not...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 5th Jun - 11:48pm
    @ Alex, It's your point not mine. You're right in saying "with a post-Coalition leader we can move on from it because the leader would...
  • User AvatarSean Hagan 5th Jun - 11:37pm
    As the above comments amply demonstrate, no good can come from endless re-examination of the Lib Dems’ record in the 2010-15 Coalition Government - or...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 5th Jun - 10:45pm
    Ed Davey became the MP for Kingston in 1997. Paddy Ashdown tasked him with the job of the party's spokesman on Treasury Affairs, adding the...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 5th Jun - 10:39pm
    @David Raw 'My memory of American Presidents goes way back to Harry.S. Truman' I too hope that D Trump will get his comeuppance in November....
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 5th Jun - 10:18pm
    HSBC's involvement in China business is no surprise as the HS stood originally for Hong Kong and Shanghai. Around 1960, before they had involvement in...