FT editorial: Lib Dems’ “ultimate selling point is they are not like the other parties”

Following on from yesterday’s feature interview with Nick Clegg, today’s Financial Times carries a generous editorial on the Lib Dems and the party’s contribution to British politics:

Nick Clegg, the leader of the Liberal Democrats, has said that it is “not beyond the realms of possibility” that his party could move into second place at the next election, ahead of Labour. His party might well receive more votes than Labour; they nearly managed that feat in 1983. …

Of the big national parties, only they opposed the war in Iraq and only they have consistently opposed Labour’s illiberalism. Thanks to Vince Cable, their economic spokesman, the Lib Dems have also been prominent in the debate on the financial crisis.

At the moment, they are also leading the debate on the country’s fiscal dilemma. Whereas the main parties continue to exchange bromides, the Lib Dems have made the bold, if contentious, decision not to support renewal of the UK’s Trident nuclear deterrent.

Offering clarity when others prefer obfuscation is a valuable public service. Even if the Lib Dems do not win, they flush out the inconsistencies of their opponents. In their eagerness to become one of Britain’s governing parties, the Liberal Democrats must avoid becoming risk-averse. Their ultimate selling point is they are not like the other parties.

Okay, so the FT is not the Daily Mail. It’s read by a small number of potential Lib Dem voters. But, still, it’s noteworthy that (1) the paper felt it was worth devoting an editorial to the Lib Dems’ prospects, and (2) when it did so, it’s given the party a positive report.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

13 Comments

  • Peter Bancroft 25th Jun '09 - 11:49am

    The days that it was embarassing to be amongst successful people and being a Lib Dem supporter (banning goldfish, wanting all schools to just “get better” without reform, criminalising speeding in wheelchairs, etc) are feeling increasingly far away.

    Whilst the Mail certainly has the potential to bring votes, support from the FT brings credibility, something we’ve really needed.

    Credit to Nick Clegg and Vince Cable in particular – it feels like there’s a big lag before there is acknowledgement of their actions, but with any luck it’s catching up now.

  • Herbert Brown 25th Jun '09 - 11:56am

    “The days that it was embarassing to be amongst successful people and being a Lib Dem supporter … are feeling increasingly far away.”

    What makes me think you have in mind a rather narrow definition of “successful people”?

  • Denim Justice 25th Jun '09 - 1:42pm

    Your ultimate selling point is that you are not like Tories and Labour… so you are defined by what you are not, rather than by anything you actually are. Isn’t that a bit sad? I mean, what happens if either Tories or Labour are popular? That makes you pretty pointless.

  • Herbert Brown 25th Jun '09 - 5:38pm

    Oranjepan

    The trouble is:
    (1) it seems to be the “Others” who are reaping the benefits of the unpopularity of the established parties, not the Lib Dems and
    (2) under the present electoral system, in order to end up with more seats than Labour, it wouldn’t be anywhere near enough for the Lib Dems to be ahead of Labour in the popular vote – the Lib Dems would need to be well over 10 points ahead of Labour.

  • Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    Another reason to switch to the Wall Street Journal.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarManfarang 21st Jan - 5:18am
    And moving the House of Lords to York is a completely daft idea.
  • User AvatarJohnmc 21st Jan - 1:40am
    Peter Watson - agree, excerpt Party is defining itself as being against 3 things (the third being against any expression of self determination in Scotland)....
  • User AvatarAndrew Melmoth 20th Jan - 11:50pm
    Jeff The article you cite is an exercise in disinformation. Under the SGP the EU can recommend the UK govt reduce its deficit but by...
  • User AvatarJeff 20th Jan - 11:23pm
    Chris Cory 20th Jan '20 - 6:45pm: No alignment, and therefore there will have to be a border between N. Ireland and the republic, or...
  • User AvatarDavid Becket 20th Jan - 10:22pm
    3 posts looking at Gender Balance, 3 Posts looking at Racial Diversity. As others have said nothing outward looking, nothing on major issues like climate...
  • User AvatarHywel 20th Jan - 9:59pm
    For most of the time I was a party member some wing or another was saying that just around the corner was some split in...