Lib Dems force government climbdown on MPs’ pension increases

As the BBC reports:

Plans to raise taxpayers’ contributions to MPs’ pensions have been dropped, ahead of a Commons debate. A planned increase had been accepted by all parties in March but the government now says it will accept a Lib Dem plan to freeze the amount from public funds.

The proposal would have seen MPs’ own contributions rise by £60 a month, but the Lib Dems said taxpayers would have paid £750,000 more than last year. All party leaders have indicated that MPs’ final salary schemes must end.

The cost to the Treasury of MPs’ pensions has risen from £9.8m in 2003 to £12m last year. Over that period, MPs themselves were asked to contribute only an extra £700,000.

The Lib Dems’ shadow work and pensions secretary Steve Webb led the party’s charge against Labour’s plans:

Until we have proposals for long-term reform, we simply cannot ask the taxpayer to make an increased contribution this year. The system of MPs’ pensions clearly needs an overhaul, and the report later this year of the Senior Salaries Review Body should set out a way forward.

“With millions of people facing economic hardship and worries about their own pensions, it is quite wrong to ask them to do more to contribute to MPs’ already very generous pensions.”

For those who like to do the math themselves, by the way, the party issued the following ‘notes to editors’ to explain the position. Well, this editor has failed to quite grasp them, so here they are unvarnished:

1. In 2008/09, Exchequer contribution to MP Pensions was 18.1% for ongoing liabilities and 8.7% to clear the deficit from when the taxpayer took a ‘holiday’ on contributions.

2. In 2009/10 with no further action, the figures would rise to 23.1% + 8.5%.

3. Harriet Harman proposes capping the first figure at 20%, and that is what her motion would do, by increasing MP contributions by just over £60 net per month.

4. But this still leaves the taxpayer putting extra money in – nearly three quarters of a million pounds more this year compared with last. The Liberal Democrat amendment takes the total figure back to the 26.8% it was last year (compared with 28.5% which is the Government’s figure).

Update: Steve Webb has blogged the inside story of Downing Street’s pensions U-turn over at his The Webb Log.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • theakes
    The one thing that holds the Lib Dem back from being a national party is a failure to get a relevant Liberal national message framed and across to the public. I...
  • Alex Macfie
    @theakes: And what about the teenage lives that might have been saved or improved because they could have gotten support through social media that they otherwis...
  • Peter Martin
    @Tristan, "...if all the money belonging to all the world’s billionaires were distributed equally among all of us we would have $1,250 each." ...
  • Nick Baird
    @John Barrett - the choice to ban children from social media rather than regulate is the one that will be harder to enforce and will be less effective. It is p...
  • Tanya Park
    Cian's right that this is the wrong call. On the seatbelt analogy. Seatbelts make an activity safer without removing it. A ban removes the activity itself, i...