“Electing diverse MPs” including All women shortlists – full motion and amendments

Here is the full motion, with the amendments to be debated, for “Electing diverse MPs” (including All Women Shortlists) which is about to be debated at the York conference. (Note: you can see the motion with its line numbers starting on page 57 of the agenda paper for conference here and the amendments starting on page 17 of Saturday’s Conference Daily sheet here.). A reminder that you can watch the live stream of the debate here.

The motion

F20 Electing Diverse MPs

Federal Executive

Mover: Caron Lindsay

Summation: Cllr Chris White

Conference notes:

I. The Liberal Democrats’ commitment to eliminating all prejudice and discrimination based upon race, colour, religion, age, disability, sex or sexual orientation, and opposition to all forms of entrenched privilege and inequality.

II. The need for the country’s elected bodies and party structures to reflect the diversity of the society we live in.

III. The insufficient diversity among the party’s past and present representatives in the House of Commons.

IV. The efforts made to date to increase diversity amongst the party’s Westminster candidates, including the Campaign for Gender Balance and the Leadership Programme, which led to more than half of all candidates in target or held seats being women.

V. The definition of under-represented groups in guidance to political parties in the Equality Act 2010 as inclusive of women, BAME, LGBT+ and disability.

VI. With regret that despite the success of measures taken recently, there has been a limited impact on the proportion of individuals elected from under-represented groups and low socio-economic backgrounds.

VII. That whilst selection of candidates is a matter devolved to the state parties, the Federal Party supports actions that are already being taken in England, Scotland and Wales to improve diversity amongst Liberal Democrat candidates and elected representatives.

Conference acknowledges that:

a) The party’s list of approved Westminster candidates does not fully reflect the communities we aim to serve.

b) The party at all levels needs to ensure that candidates from under-represented groups are attracted to apply and then selected to stand for elected office.

c) To have a more diverse set of MPs, the party must concentrate its efforts to increase the number of diverse candidates in the most winnable Westminster seats.

d) Proposals will be coming forward on wider party diversity, including in party structures and local government, as part of the Federal Executive-led Governance Review to the Autumn Federal Conference.

e) Our use of zipping in past EU elections shows that positive action can be very effective.

f) Scottish Liberal Democrats do not allow seat selections to proceed unless 40% of the short-list is female, and that seats have been asked to re-advertise where their efforts to increase diversity were not deemed sufficient, and welcomes Scottish Leader Willie Rennie’s working group which is considering measures to improve gender balance in future elections.

Conference recognises that:

i) The party is required to consider the provisions of the Equality Act 2010, including Section 104, which permits political parties to take proportionate positive action to reduce inequality in the party’s representation in Westminster, but does not allow shortlists for candidate selections to be restricted to individuals with protected characteristics other than by gender and disability.

iI) In percentage terms, the largest single under-represented group is women, who make up 51% of the UK population.

iii) Individuals may have more than one protected characteristic which should be taken into consideration in any intervention.

iv) There can be minorities who are under-represented even within under-represented groups and that this should be taken into consideration in any intervention.

v) Liberal Democrats continue to value candidates from over-represented groups, and will ensure that training and support is available for them.

Conference therefore resolves that to increase the proportion of Liberal Democrats from under-represented groups in the House of Commons the Liberal Democrats will:

A. Continue and extend support for individuals seeking approval or selection as Westminster candidates from under-represented groups, thus building on the work that has been done in the past including the Leadership Programme.

B. Create a “2020 Candidate Diversity Task Force” to co-ordinate party-wide efforts to actively recruit parliamentary candidates from under-represented groups from both inside and outside the Party. This will include a focus on recruiting candidates with more than one protected characteristic and from minorities who are under-represented even within under-represented groups. The Task Force will work with ALDC and our cohort of councillors, recognising that, whilst local government is important in its own right, it can also be a good recruiting ground for potential Parliamentary candidates. It will report to the Federal Executive, working with the Diversity Engagement Group as appropriate. The Task Force will have one representative each from the three state parties, the Federal Executive, ALDC, EMLD, LDDA, LGBT+, LDW, Liberal Youth and PCA and be led by a Candidate Diversity Champion appointed by the Leader and the President. The Federal Executive Report to Conference will include updates on the work of the Candidate Diversity Task Force.

C. Through the work of the 2020 Candidate Diversity Task Force and Candidate Diversity Champion, in association with SAOs, AOs, ALDC and parliamentary candidates, examine the party’s approval and selection processes, and the role of PPCs after selection, to identify barriers that may exist for under-represented groups, including those identified in the Speaker?s Conference on Parliamentary Selection, as well as disadvantaged groups including those from a low socio-economic background. Solutions will be proposed to overcome these barriers; to seek to make proposals to increase diversity at all levels in the party; and to bring forward proposals on how to address the emotional, practical and financial challenges facing candidates from under-represented groups.

Conference recommends that:

1. Any local party should be able to vote for an all-women shortlist or an all-disabled shortlist, or reserve some spaces for candidates from other under-represented groups.

2. As a minimum the three state parties should follow the Canadian Liberal Party practice of requiring the relevant Local Party to provide documented evidence to their region or state (as relevant) of a thorough search for potential candidates from under-represented groups before being granted permission to start their Westminster selection process; this should apply in those seats where the Liberal Democrat parliamentary candidate received more than 15% of the vote in the 2015 General Election but the seat is not held by the Liberal Democrats.

3. In Scotland, Wales and each Region of the English Party, take measures to move towards a slate of candidates that reflects the diversity of the state or region, in line with the Leader?s ambition of having at least 50% women candidates and at least 10% BAME candidates across Great Britain.

4. If any sitting MP elected in 2015 decides not to contest the next General Election, his replacement should be selected from an all-women shortlist.

5. In Scotland, Wales, and each Region of the English Party where there are two or more non-held seats which gained 25% or more of the General Election vote in May 2015, the regions should designate as a minimum of one seat not held by a Liberal Democrat MP to select its candidate from an all-women shortlist. Where these seats are affected by boundary changes, the party?s rules on re-running selection processes will apply.

6. In addition to the one seat identified in 5. above, where the Liberal Democrat parliamentary result at the 2015 General Election was in the 10% of seats which had the highest percentage vote without returning a Liberal Democrat MP, the selection shortlist for the 2020 General Election should, subject to sufficient applications, include at least two candidates from under-represented groups.

Applicability: Federal.

Mover and summation: 16 minutes combined; mover and summation of any amendments: 4 minutes, all other speakers: 3 minutes. For eligibility and procedure for speaking in this debate see page 13.

In addition to speeches from the platform, voting members will be able to make concise (maximum one-minute) interventions from the floor during the debate on the motion. See page 13 for further information.

Amendments proposed

F20 Electing Diverse MPs
The FCC wishes to make it clear that it considered this motion and its proposed amendments (including those
amendments that were not selected) in the light of the detailed provisions of the Equality Act 2010, the guidance
issued under the Act and related equalities legislation.
The Federal Conference Committee has accepted the following drafting amendments to the motion:
In I. (line 3), after ‘religion’ insert‘or belief’, and after ‘sex’ insert‘, gender identity’.
After VII. (line 24), insert:
VIII. The proportion of Liberal Democrat councillors who are female has stayed flat at around one third for
25 years.
After C. (line 96), insert:
D. Working in conjunction with ALDC, the 2020 Candidate Diversity Task Force shall undertake a project
to encourage a move diverse local government base including identifying any barriers which exist for
currently under-represented groups. It will also consider good practice from council groups across
the country that more accurately reflect the diversity of their communities.
After 6. (line 130), add:
7. Ask ALDC to submit recommendations within twelve months to the three State Parties on measures
that should be taken to ensure gender balance and diversity across both council groups and
amongst selected council candidates.

Amendment One

East Midlands
Mover: Rebecca Thomas
Summation: Adam Wain
In 1. (line 98), delete ‘for an all-women shortlist or an all-disabled shortlist, or’ and insert‘to’.
In 1. (line 100), delete ‘other’.
Delete 4. and 5. (lines 115–124).
In 6. (line 125), delete‘In addition to the one seat identified in 5. above,’.
In 6. (lines 127–128), delete‘without returning a Liberal Democrat MP’.

Amendment Two

12 party members
Mover: Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera
Summation: Sarah Noble
In B. (line 69), after‘co-ordinate’ insert‘and monitor’.
After C. (line 96), insert:
D. Campaign to amend the Equality Act 2010 to remove the restrictions on shortlists for candidate
selections for people from under-represented groups.
In 3. (line 114), after‘Great Britain’ insert‘and set out to each Local Party the options they can take to
improve diversity, including the use of ‘banding’ when shortlisting, and the potential to reserve places on
shortlists for people from under-represented groups within the terms of Section 104 of the Equalities Act.
State Parties should report on the implementation of each of these measures’.

Footnote:The final part of this amendment refers to positive action measures permitted by the Equalities Act
2010, including the ability to shortlist candidates from under-represented groups ahead of other candidates on a
tied score.

* Paul Walter is a Liberal Democrat activist. He is one of the Liberal Democrat Voice team. He blogs at Liberal Burblings.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Conference.
Advert

8 Comments

  • Simon – you are spot on.

  • I am listening to Chris White getting really hot up about his own total failure to uderstand statistics – and hence discrimination.

    Now I know why our Party drove. lemming-like. over the electoral cliff from 2015 to 2010.

  • The motion and amendment two were both passed, amendment one fell. Some cracking speeches on all sides.

  • A very sad day for our party, and a result that is just as likely to reduce diversity as to increase it.

  • David Cooper 13th Mar '16 - 3:45pm

    A good day for the sharp elbowed. A tragedy for the party.

  • 4. If any sitting MP elected in 2015 decides not to contest the next General Election, his replacement should be selected from an all-women shortlist.

    So what does this really mean in the context of the next election when the number of constituencies changes from 650 to 600.

    But then none of it really matters as I note the words: Conference recommends … so this motion can safely be totally ignored…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Jeff
    expats 18th Sep '21 - 11:07am: The first of the French ‘off the shelf Shortfins’ wasn’t due for delivery until 2033 so any ‘start from scratc...
  • Jeff
    John Marriott 18th Sep '21 - 9:38am: I gather that New Zealand isn’t happy about the new arrangement, as she still wants good relations with the PR...
  • Peter
    Where does this put psychiatric, psychological, therapeutic and consultative treatment of children presenting wih gender dysphoria? Is all exploration of such a...
  • Simon Pike
    I agree with Stuart that we need to get serious about housing. But getting serious means listening to the members with experience on housing issues - and Parlia...
  • Hywel
    Alongside this is the significant - but rather under-reported by the press - position adopted over the summer that the price of supporting a Labour admin/govern...