General confession of collective culpability

Embed from Getty Images

Speaking with authority and gravitas will no longer suffice.

All that remains, in this post-Elizabethan era, are dwindling fragments of respect.

We know and might even believe this – if we were bothered to read last week’s declaration – the General Confession of Collective Culpability.

But the electorate are long past being bothered.

Of all the decade’s damages – the fiscal black holes, climatic disasters, crumbling hospitals, contaminated blood, midwifery mistakes, flammable flats, irregular regulators – the single greatest disaster is that we no longer know who to trust.

Is this readiness to question everything a new sign of maturity? Or has trust been traded away to some slipping and sliding marketplace?

The House of Lords Statutory Committee for Inquiry into Enquiries could not have been less outspoken.  PABOSY – the UK’s Prestigious Award for Blindingly Obvious Statement of the Year goes to the Committee Chair: ’Lessons learned’ is an entirely vacuous phrase if lessons aren’t being learned because inquiry recommendations are ignored or delayed . . . it is insulting and upsetting for victims, survivors and their families who frequently hope that, from their unimaginable grief, something positive might prevail.’

But we’ve been here before.  The 2014 Enquiry into Inquiries made 33 recommendations of which 19 were accepted and 14 rejected by successive Conservative governments.  Now, a full decade later, it seems 32 were never implemented but their Lordships are still keen to push on with 26.

Ed said (and Keir concurs) that restoring trust is a parliamentary priority – but they both know, and we all know, that rebottling that spirit is even more difficult than implementing Carbon Capture & Storage – itself a wishful action-avoiding fantasy.  The very best that Ed & Keir might hope for is to not incur further damage.

We may earnestly wish for a world where regulators regulate, where countries collaborate on climate action, where everyone believes in human rights – but, sadly, we now live in societies where these wishes are increasingly ignored.  As David Lammy MP said, in the aftermath of the Grenfell Tower fire, “we must now ask if the post-Thatcher shift away from public duty and towards private profit in the name of ‘efficiency’ requires us now to consider if the nation still believes in a welfare state with a safety net for citizens who fall on hard times.’

David, bless, now finds himself at the helm of a Foreign Office suspected of squandering Overseas Aid billions through cosy contracts anywhere but overseas.

Good luck if you want someone to realise the wish for instant restoration of trust, but let’s face it, we have collectively visited these sins of commission and omission upon ourselves.  It is increasingly clear that the evolution of economies must now be a spiritual quest, a reformation, a rejection of faith-based pseudo-sciences, and a resurgence of honest accountability.  Either that or humanity is squashed under the crushing weight of late-stage capitalist conventions.

* David Brunnen is media liaison officer for Fareham Liberal Democrats. He writes on Municipal Autonomy, Intelligent Communities, Sustainability & Digital Challenges.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

4 Comments

  • It that graph showing what I think it is?
    Namely, NONE of the Accepted recommendations were implemented, but one of the Rejected recommendations was.

  • David Brunnen 24th Oct '24 - 1:53pm

    Roland – You understood perfectly – and that diagram referred only to the state of previous recommendations made in 2014. Now in 2024 we are in the midst of a ‘bumper crop’ of recent Enquiries each of which will doubtless have a long list of urgent recommendations and potential litigation. T

    Those affected by, for example, the 2018 Grenfell Fire may have had their chance to voice their woes, but they do not yet see appropriate justice being served on the galaxy of miscreants – public or private. Corporate manslaughter is difficult to prosecute and the passage of time inevitably means that individual decision makers have moved on, departments are reshuffled, contractors are subsumed into larger organisations, and governments change.

    There is a need to rconsider forms of lasting punishments that are not custodial or financial.

    Why, for example, in the case of The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, is it not now required that the grand crest that adorns their official headed paper is replaced by an image of that burning tower block as a perpetual reminder of their contribution to the disaster? Similarly, why should various contractors/suppliers not be obliged to publish a note of their involvement on all future contract bid documents. We do it on fag packets – why not remind regulators or other public services to carry the flag into whatever future they may be able to rescue? A lasting reminder of community responsibility?

  • “ why not remind regulators or other public services…”
    Given the behaviour of the government with respect to including Fujitsu on shortlists and awarding new contracts to them, despite the on-going reminder of the crimes they committed whilst operating the Post Office Horizon system, I doubt this will have much real effect.

  • David Brunnen 25th Oct '24 - 12:01pm

    ” . . . I doubt this. will have much real effect.”
    We should not accept a counsel of despair – not accept that fresh thinking is impossible – but redouble determination to find alternatives to custodial and financial penalties. If we can ban use of a product on the basis of presumed but unproven deficiencies, then surely a grossly deficient contractor could similarly be sanctioned. Likewise regulators that have been captured by the supposedly regulated. Fresh thinking is not so very difficult – ideas abound in places where corruption has been rooted out – e.g. Moldova Exam/Qualification Commission.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Hywel
    Paul - what was this. It isn't on the wikipedia page of polls. Not surprised by the lack of commentary - the slow but noticeable down-tick in reform poll rati...
  • paul barker
    A note on Reform, we have just seen the 2nd Poll showing Reform losing their lead. You might think that would attract some notice by Journalists or The Commenta...
  • Peter Chambers
    > Clearly the aircraft carriers were a pork barrel for Gordon Brown’s constituency. Doubtful. More to do with the US "pivot to Asia". The UK does not have...
  • Mark ValladaresMark Valladares
    @ Matt (Bristol), You use the word “vanguardism” as though politicians don’t have an obligation to lead, rather than merely following the loudest voice...
  • Mark Smulian
    I first worked with Michael on his three pamphlets published in the mid-1980s by Liberator and mentioned above by Geoffrey Payne. He was, obviously, an effectv...