Glenda Jackson: Labour’s worst ever transport minister?

Current Secretary of Sate for Transport, Lord Adonis rightly gets praise from across the political spectrum. Although there’s by no means cross-party agreement on some transport issues (think Heathrow for a start), Adonis is generally respected even when he is disagreed with. Whilst he has an extremely strong claim to have been the best Labour transport minister since 1997, some of the competition for that accolade is not exactly stiff.

Indeed, the publication a few days ago of another cross-party Select Committee report into the failings of part-privatisation on the London Underground reminds me of just how bad Labour MP Glenda Jackson was as a transport minister for a period after the 1997 general election.

Glenda Jackson was an enthusiastic cheerleader for privatising parts of the Tube and back in 1999 boldly claimed:

It is absurd to presuppose that a public-private partnership evinced by this Government will do anything other than produce the best possible value for the taxpayer and the people of London by ensuring adequate investment…

The scaremongering of the hon. Member for Kingston and Surbiton [Lib Dem Ed Davey], who says that such reviews would lead to excessive and overweening costs, is unfounded…

We have been meticulous in assuring ourselves that the model on which we base the definition of PPP contracts will deliver the best possible value to the taxpayer and, of course, to the underground itself. (Hansard)

The reality? As the cross-party group of MPs put it in their latest report:

Transport for London (TfL) today welcomed the Commons Transport Select Committee’s confirmation that the London Underground (LU) Public Private Partnership (PPP) contracts are “flawed” and have “failed to prove” value for money…

The Committee’s report said: “We reiterate once again our judgement that the PPP scheme is flawed. Some 20 months following the demise of Metronet, the Government is no nearer being able to demonstrate that the PPP provides value for money for the taxpayer.”…

LU Managing Director, Mike Brown said: “This report confirms that the PPP is failing to deliver improvements to the Tube, value for money and is therefore failing to deliver for London.” (TfL press release)

Louise Ellman, the Labour MP who chairs the Transport Select Committee put it succinctly:

The PPP scheme is flawed. Some 20 months following the demise of Metronet, the Government is no nearer to being able to demonstrate that the PPP provides value for money for the taxpayer.

Not so much “absurd” or “scaremongering” as absolutely right, Glenda. Shame she didn’t listen to the warnings and instead gave her full backing to part-privatising the tube.

I suspect Glenda Jackson’s keen support for privatisation may not be going down too well with her many constituents who are suffering from repeated closures on the Northern and Jubilee Lines, a point I’m sure the Liberal Democrat candidate for Hamsptead & Kilburn, Ed Fordham, will be reminding them of.

Read more by or more about , , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in London.


  • Great point, but while we are about it, can’t we get round to reversing the absurd policy the Lib Dems have of longer franchises for the private rail franchisees for the country as a whole? This is an utterly unconvincing policy and we, of all parties, should have the guts to face up to the failure of privatisation not just on the tube but on the national rail network as a whole.

    The idea that giving subsidy junkie franchisees longer contracts will solve matters is like saying that if we leave an alcoholic in charge of the bar a bit longer he will drink himself sober.

    We need a bit of consistency if we are going to make this kind of criticism.

  • Longer franchises are acceptable only if linked to investment in infrastructure, see the succesful Evergreen 1, 2 & 3 projects at Chiltern Railways, for example.

  • Except that almost all the extra investment in rail has come from the state, not the operating companies. Who do you think paid the the West Coast mainline upgrade etc?

    It is Network Rail that will be putting £250m into those projects. Don’t be fooled by Chiltern’s propaganda.

    Privatisation has not been a success. Extra public funding for investment in railways has though. It could have been done to greater effect under public ownership, without the TOCs siphoning off vast amounts of money.

  • Liberal Eye 30th Mar '10 - 1:45pm

    Privatisation has of, course, been a huge success for the many lawyers, consultants and crony companies who have done very well out of it but a disaster for the rollling stock manufacturers who closed as a side effect of the disruption to order flow it caused – all of which is typical of Con/Lab governments of the last 30 years.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Roland
    Attach an Apple Air Tag to your sign, whilst it won’t stop the sign being removed, you stand a good chance of locating where it’s been taken to…...
  • John Marriott
    @Peter Martin Under PR I reckon that, with their current opinion poll rating of around 12%, the Lib Dems might expect to get around 78 seats at Westminster. @...
  • David Blake
    Many years ago, my girlfriend at the time was living in a flat owned by the local Conservatives. One weekend all the power went out. The fusebox was in the ba...
  • Tom Hannigan
    The 3 main parties in Ireland frequently nominate more than one candidate in our multi seat constituencies which can have 3,4 or 5 seats. It depends on what you...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Andrew, You seem to be somewhat contradictory on your "solidarity fund". Whatever you want to call it it will mean that if someone moves to Germany fro...