Good news on the Pupil Premium

The Independent reports:

Thinking outside the box can do wonders for disadvantaged pupils, according to evidence from schools about how they are using the Government’s pupil premium to improve performance.

In one case, the simple act of buying a pupil a football kit and providing soccer coaching, as his parents were unable to afford it, dramatically improved his performance, Schools minister David Laws told The Independent. “It got him taking part in lessons and attending again,” said the Liberal Democrat.

On Wednesday the Pupil Premium awards will highlight those schools who are making the most of the extra funding and targeting at the most disadvantaged children. You can see the finalists here. Last year the winner in the Secondary category was Millfield Science and Performing Arts College, where 2014 disadvantaged students actually out-performed their non-disadvantaged peers at GCSE.

The Pupil Premium was one of our flagship policies in our 2010 manifesto and a red line in Coalition negotiations, so it is not surprising that we are explaining how successful it proved to be whenever we get the chance.

Here is David Laws talking about the Pupil Premium awards last year:

Today Lib Dem HQ quotes Nick Clegg saying :

It is a national tragedy that in a modern, open society like ours a child’s destiny is still being determined by their background. That’s why I’ve made it a priority to help pupils catch up and keep up.

This new analysis challenges the myth that children from wealthy families will always do better than their less privileged peers. This is why I introduced the Pupil Premium in the first place.

We still have a long way to go and need to continue investing so that all children get the best start in life.

I want all schools to reach those heights so that we can build a fairer society for all,  and banish the link between a family’s wealth and their child’s success to the history books.

 

 

* Mary Reid is a contributing editor on Lib Dem Voice. She was a councillor in Kingston upon Thames, where she is still very active with the local party, and is the Hon President of Kingston Lib Dems.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • It’s great to see positive coverage of the pupil’s premium, but my reading of the lessons learnt is that we should devolve decision making to lower levels and allow more space for professional discretion than currently. It would be great to see us occasionally recognise traditional liberal free choice agenda.

  • Jane Ann Liston 30th Mar '15 - 10:40am

    Just heard someone on Woman’s Hour explaining how they were able to use pupil premium money to help disadvantaged girls who were self-harming. Sounds like evidence of this policy’s benefits does it not?. I only wish that we had it in Scotland.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • GWYN WILLIAMS
    "And it is not just fingers. I got a very nasty dog bite on the bum once." It's only Monday and I have a mental image of someone trying to push a leaflet throug...
  • Alex Macfie
    Steve J Smith: Яeform may claim to be against the Online "Safety" (sic) Act and other online "for the children" surveillance for the sake of getting a few vote...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Tom, Your figure of the richest 200 families being worth £711 bn suggests that a 1% wealth tax should bring in £7bn on them alone. I'd start with thes...
  • John Smith
    And yet millions of people have managed to protest against Israel’s actions without getting arrested. It’s almost like expressing support for a group tha...
  • Nick Baird
    I agree with Tara (without necessarily supporting what the PA activists did). It was wrong to proscribe PA as terrorists, and in any case that happened *after* ...