Gordon’s speech – Danny Alexander responds (and so do I) #lab09

Gordon Brown delivered his speech to the Labour Party’s conference in Brighton today – you can read it in full here, or watch it here.

For the Lib Dems, Nick Clegg’s chief-of-staff Danny Alexander has issued the following response:

Gordon Brown’s speech showed just how tired and bereft of new thinking the Labour Party is. His new announcements were a hotchpotch of the ineffective and the ill-thought through, rehashed press releases, copied ideas and humiliating U-turns.

“The fact is Gordon Brown has presided over a huge and widening gap between the richest and the poorest, he has failed a generation of young people, overseen the collapse of the banking system and the disgrace of our political system.

“Britain needs a fresh start. The real choice is now between the real change offered by the Liberal Democrats and the fake change offered by the Conservatives.”

Which, with all due respect to Danny, reads like a statement which could have been written (and probably was) before Mr Brown rose to his feet to speak.

My insta-pundit reaction – based on reading rather than watching the speech – is:

1) Overall, I thought it was one of Mr Brown’s better efforts. It was a very grounded speech, which seemed to respond (however misguidedly etc) to the everyday concerns of voters – from anti-social criminal behaviour to single parents to cancer care. He managed to convey a sense of vision, and successfully portrayed the next election as a big choice.

2) What was shockingly poor was his brief, casually bland reference to Afghanistan. I know there some raised eyebrows at last week’s Lib Dem conference when Nick Clegg opened by talking about our military engagement there – but he was absolutely right that it is the single most urgent issue facing the UK at this time. The Prime Minister spared the conflict just five lines of cliched rhetoric: shameful.

3) The lack of reference to the financial challenges that lie ahead (as opposed to all those in the past year Gordon says he’s single-handedly solved himself) was, I think, a mistake. The Prime Minister tried to portray Labour as the party of “prosperity and hope” – which is fine, and doubtless effective in the conference hall. But people know there are tought times ahead. The blinkered pretence that the Government can carry on spending and all will be well is seductive but wrong-headed.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • I notice you didnt mention his sick proposal to bring back the Victorian institution of The Home for Fallen
    women, in effect imprisonment without trial for the crime of pregnancy. We should give Labour a good kicking for this, especially when they claim to be progressive or liberal.

  • sanbikinoraion 30th Sep '09 - 10:53am

    I totally agree with plumbus. It sounds like an utterly terrifying policy.

  • I agree with plumbus and sanbikinoraion. My blood ran cold when I heard him say that young single mums would be “placed” in these institutions. Placed??? What is he thinking? Or maybe he isn’t, of course. We must make the most of this draconian idea. A particularly nasty, illiberal idea.

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Henry
    I do get very annoyed by the comments on these by-election posts. The over-exaggeration of our comeback because we won last week and then complain when we finis...
  • Daniel Walker
    @David Raw I am afraid I don't know that; however I am always wary of arguments that say we should have the cheapest possible democracy. (Which isn't to say ...
  • Daniel Walker
    @Kira I was at the debate where that policy was decided. There were two other options: one was the regions of England having the same powers as Scotland and ...
  • David Raw
    @ Daniel Walker Has the party costed the amount for changing to the arrangement you describe, Daniel, and what amount does it come to ? For my part I wo...
  • David Raw
    Mick Taylor is correct, and I well remember the late Dr Michael Winstanley (the then Liberal MP for Cheadle) giving the Minister, David Ennals, a torrid time in...