Government changes its mind and makes caste discrimination illegal

The BBC reports that Vince Cable has agreed to outlaw caste discrimination after the House of Lords twice voted on an amendment incorporating it into the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill.

Those proposing the change argued that those considered to be of lower caste in some communities were discriminated against in employment or even at school. A government report from 2010 argued that a change in the law was the most effective way of dealing with this issue.

Liberal Democrat peer Eric Avebury has been at the forefront of the campaign to outlaw caste discrimination and has written about it on this site. He welcomed the Government’s change of heart in a brief intervention in the Lords:

I shall add a 15-second contribution to what the noble and right reverend Lord, Lord Harries of Pentregarth, has already said about our gratitude to the Minister, who, as he said, has listened carefully to the representations that have been made. I only wish that she could have seen the joy that the announcement caused among the communities, which was displayed in a demonstration in Parliament Square yesterday afternoon. Hundreds of people were there, welcoming the change of attitude by the Government and saying that this was a moment of tremendous excitement and joy among all the Dalit communities.

I am not so sure about Talk for a Change, because I think that it is probably a waste of money. However, this is not the moment to cavil about the detail but only to welcome the principle that this matter will be dealt with by legislation. I am most grateful to my noble friend and to the Government as a whole for their change of mind, declared at this last moment.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

8 Comments

  • Daniel Carr 25th Apr '13 - 9:04am

    “Liberal Democrat peer Eric Avebury has been at the forefront of the campaign to allow caste discrimination ”

    I think it should read ‘ban’ not ‘allow’

  • Caron Lindsay Caron Lindsay 25th Apr '13 - 9:07am

    The word that was actually in my head was outlaw. Thanks for pointing that out so I could amend it so quickly.

  • Melanie Harvey 25th Apr '13 - 11:19am

    As caste discrimination has therefore been in play and, by census records which show my household to be mixed race, it has to be considered, this may play a part in and contributed as to why, the police have not done anything to date in concern of a serious assault and have for several years dispite evidence in support .

  • James Harper 25th Apr '13 - 1:04pm

    Delighted about this- wasn’t all that hopeful, but it was obviously the right thing to do and a small enough issue that a u-turn was possible.

  • Roger Roberts/Wales 25th Apr '13 - 6:09pm

    We owe Eric a tremendous debt of gratitude. In the Lords he is a model of what a Liberal should be. Diolch Eric.

  • Great news.

  • Wonderful outcome! – thanks in particular to Eric Avebury and Vince Cable.

  • Great step forward here

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Andrew Tampion
    "We elect MPs to make decisions for us. If a future government gets elected on a platform to join the EU, then consent would be there. We didn’t need a refere...
  • Jonathan Parry
    This is an interesting article. One Nation Toryism never got going until the demise of the Liberals in the 1920s (Disraeli certainly never practised it). To t...
  • Peter Davies
    In Latin it may be a gerund but in English it's a noun. If I were to object to the Government's referending of the public, that would be a gerund....
  • Alex Macfie
    Except that "referendum" is not a Latin 2nd Declension Neuter noun. It's a gerundive; as such it is used in English differently from Latin so should take an Eng...
  • PM
    @ PM, It can be either. I do remember from my schooldays that the plural in Latin involved replacing the 'um' of a neuter noun by an 'a'. I must have managed...