Government secrets may be revealed earlier

An independent review to be published this month is expected to recommend that the 30-year rule on government secrets should be changed to 15 years. Under current rules, 30-year-old confidential government papers are released annually by the National Archives in Kew.

The review was commissioned by Gordon Brown in 2007 and the team, led by Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre, has already reported its findings to the Prime Minister.

From the Independent on Sunday:

“Secrets behind events such as the miners’ strike, the poll tax riots and Black Wednesday may be laid bare as early as next year. A new 15-year rule would also see the battles of the first year of Tony Blair’s government revealed in three years’ time.”

The director of Liberty, Shami Chakrabarti said,

“It is ironic that when it comes to personal privacy it is a case of the Government saying you have nothing to fear, but when you apply that rationale to the idea of secrecy in Government it would seem it has rather a lot to hide.”

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

  • Curiouser and curiouser. We have no idea what such documents might contain – but such a change happening before a possible election…

    Perhaps they are hoping that some useful titbits might be unearthed with which to embarrass the opposition?

    Nothing Labour does these days has a non-partisan root

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Simon McGrath
    The picture is in the article if put through an AI detector comes out as high probability AI generated...
  • Simon McGrath
    @James, it is quite clearly to to pass itself off as associated with the Party by using the party name. The website is very odd. There are lots of strange b...
  • Hywel
    Also they don't identify who the data controller is, just say you will be notified about this if you sign up. When you go to sign up it asks for a number of bi...
  • Hywel
    That whole site/family of sites is very very weird and feels like an AI bot got drunk and went off on one. Eg this is about Leeds as a dating location: "Kirkg...
  • Jana
    @Hywel “(Also – why is everyone white?)” Your comment persuaded me to look at the site and, as you point out, all the couples shown are white. They ar...