Mark Pack

Government takes a small step forward in removing sexism in Royal inheritance

By | Thu 30th June 2011 - 10:42 pm

The Evening Standard reports:

George Osborne just made a historic announcement about the Royal finances.

His reforms, signalled first in his Budget a year ago, pave the way for a first-born daughter of Kate and William to be Heir to the Throne.

The heir is supported by £16 million a year revenues from the Duchy of Cornwall estate. At present the Duke is Prince Charles.  But a girl cannot become a duke, so Osborne is changing the rules.

“We propose to correct this anomaly by making clear that in future the revenues of the Duchy of Cornwall will go to the heir whether or not they are the Duke of Cornwall,” said the Chancellor.

On its own this does not abolish the rule of primogeniture, which means a first-born daughter of Kate and Wills would be superseded in the succession by a younger brother. But it shows that ministers are putting the finances in place for the day when the law of succession is brought into the modern age.

Welcome news, especially as it’s an issue which Lynne Featherstone and Nick Clegg have been pushing on and which is overwhelmingly backed by the public.

 

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • g 1st Jul '11 - 9:22am

    OK, I know this is against the prevailing political consensus. I’m all for reducing sexism, but I really don’t think minor changes to primogeniture do anything to make the inherited wealth and inherited power of the monarch even slightly more justifiable.

  • Greg 1st Jul '11 - 10:08am

    I thought the Queen was the Duke of Lancaster?

  • Paul 1st Jul '11 - 4:49pm

    Hurrah! Equal rights for princesses! Now that’s a reason to be in government.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Big Tall Tim
    Excellent stuff Ed. Very well said...
  • Simon Robinson
    @Roland. Yes strictly speaking you are correct that it's the individual who chooses to view high taxes as a disincentive. But realistically, the vast majority o...
  • Richard Treadwell
    Do you think we need to spell out how we'll pay for our expensive tax cuts and defence investment? Surely, rejoining the single market/customs union (valuable a...
  • David Raw
    "David Chadwick launches bid to be Welsh Lib Dem Leader"..................... how can he 'launch a bid ' when he is the only qualified candidate ?...
  • Mick Taylor
    @Tristan Ward. I do think that we do need higher tax rates than we have for the very rich and some way of taxing wealth, probably through land or property taxat...