Government takes a small step forward in removing sexism in Royal inheritance

Our place to talk – an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.

The most-read independent website by and for Lib Dem supporters. Not paid for by trade unions or millionaires.

Advert

Government takes a small step forward in removing sexism in Royal inheritance

By Mark Pack | Thu 30th June 2011 - 10:42 pm

Follow @markpack

The Evening Standard reports:

George Osborne just made a historic announcement about the Royal finances.

His reforms, signalled first in his Budget a year ago, pave the way for a first-born daughter of Kate and William to be Heir to the Throne.

The heir is supported by £16 million a year revenues from the Duchy of Cornwall estate. At present the Duke is Prince Charles. But a girl cannot become a duke, so Osborne is changing the rules.

“We propose to correct this anomaly by making clear that in future the revenues of the Duchy of Cornwall will go to the heir whether or not they are the Duke of Cornwall,” said the Chancellor.

On its own this does not abolish the rule of primogeniture, which means a first-born daughter of Kate and Wills would be superseded in the succession by a younger brother. But it shows that ministers are putting the finances in place for the day when the law of succession is brought into the modern age.

Welcome news, especially as it’s an issue which Lynne Featherstone and Nick Clegg have been pushing on and which is overwhelmingly backed by the public.

Read more by Mark Pack or more about george osborne, lynne featherstone, nick clegg or royal primogeniture.
This entry was posted in News.

Advert

4 Comments

g 1st Jul '11 - 9:22am

OK, I know this is against the prevailing political consensus. I’m all for reducing sexism, but I really don’t think minor changes to primogeniture do anything to make the inherited wealth and inherited power of the monarch even slightly more justifiable.
Greg 1st Jul '11 - 10:08am

I thought the Queen was the Duke of Lancaster?
Paul 1st Jul '11 - 4:49pm

Hurrah! Equal rights for princesses! Now that’s a reason to be in government.
Andrew Page 1st Jul '11 - 7:51pm

I agree with g. Completely.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *

Website

Comment

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Most Read

Op-eds

Observations of an Expat An Iranian Who’s Who (Tom Arms)
The Independent View: Are mutuals the answer to the water crisis? (People's Commission on the Water Sector)
William Wallace writes: We should talk more about Liberalism (Lord William Wallace)
The future of war has arrived: It’s the Navy (Edward Marsh)
The law has never told you which door to use (Tanya Park)

Advert

Recent Comments

Suzanne Fletcher
This article has taken the final nail off the coffin lid. It started at Michael Meadowcroft's funeral last week, hearing his words repeated, his values restate...
Chloe
I wonder how tempting it might be for Labour to call an early GE. Support for the cost of living crisis are only incremental , the early prison release scheme c...
Pawel Urbanski
Having grown up in Communist Poland, I never take freedom for granted, which is why this piece strongly resonates. What drew me to the Lib Dems was not tactics ...
Jana
Yes, two good second place performances for us to feel good about. Unfortunately, however, a very good night for Reform with 3 wins and 2 second places across t...
Nigel Jones
Yes we need to think through and articulate our Lib dem approach to economics and the way we order society. I see the occasional attempt at this on LDV but out ...