Government takes action over ‘vulture funds’

When Labour were in power, Liberal Democrats regularly attacked the government for its inaction over so-called vulture funds (that is, in this context, financial funds who buy up debt from poor countries and try to make a profit out of it). For example, then International Development spokesperson Lynne Featherstone said,

Gordon Brown has said this is immoral but so far it’s been all talk and no action.

The Government needs to take a stand and use its influence in the IMF to help devise an internationally binding system to ensure companies can’t prey on heavily indebted developing countries in this way.

The Government claims they advise countries to help them avoid being used by vulture funds. That is all well and good – but they must take stronger action to help the countries that are already in this horrible and immoral financial prison.

Temporary action was eventually taken by Labour. The coalition agreement itself was fairly tepid on the topic, promising a review, but breaking the cliche that a review is an excuse for pausing pending further inaction, the review turned into action. The Treasury’s press release says,

Legislation to make permanent The Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Act 2010 was passed in the House of Commons today. The legislation will stop creditors, including so-called “Vulture Funds”, from using the UK courts to extract harsh and inequitable payments from poor countries for debts that the companies may in some cases have bought for a fraction of the cost.

The Act could save poor countries an estimated £145m over six years.

The original Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Act 2010 was passed in April 2010, temporarily restricting the actions of “Vulture Funds” in the UK.  This act had a sunset clause meaning that it was due to expire on 7 June. To prevent Vulture Funds returning to the UK, the Government has passed legislation to make the law permanent.

Danny Alexander said of this,

Today the Government has acted to stop the unjust actions of a few unscrupulous companies having a huge impact upon the futures of some of the poorest countries in the world.

This act will make sure that Vulture Funds will never again be able to exploit the poorest countries in the world within the UK’s courts.

Co-Chair of the Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Committee on International Affairs, Martin Horwood said:

It will save poor countries nearly £150m over the coming years by preventing ‘vulture funds’ from using the UK courts to sue poor countries for the full repayment of debts that they have bought cheaply.

Vulture funds are effectively wiping out the benefits which international debt relief was supposed to bring the poorest countries in the world.

The Liberal Democrats have long fought on this issue and that is why I’m delighted that the UK is achieving a world first by making this law permanent. This shows the Coalition has a real commitment to helping the poorest countries with this unfair and crippling debt.

I urge the Government to continue the fight against these vulture funds and ensure that the members of the G8 follow suit at their meeting later this month.

Read more by or more about , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Excellent news, does it contain any clauses to stop fund owners who operate in other legislations operating in the UK ??

  • Good news indeed. It appears that the coalition has undone the final misdeed of the tories in opposition. Let’s not forget that the original bill had no sunset clause and this would have been embedded in permanent legislation over a year ago if Conservative (and now coalition) MP Christopher Chope had not derailed it by objecting, under cover provided by his colleagues. Thankfully, it made its way through the wash-up and the coalition has now done the right thing.

  • Rather misleading headline, but as has been said above, very welcome news,

  • Good news!

    And they let a Lib Dem announce it!

  • Echoing Jonathan above, this was the reaction I got from my local Jubilee2000 contact –

    QUOTE
    The main problem seems to be that the vultures are still allowed to operate in UK territories such as Jersey, as the Act has not yet been extended to cover all UK overseas territories and dependencies. One US vulture fund (FG Hemisphere) is currently suing the Democratic Republic of Congo, the second poorest country in the world, for $100 million in courts in Jersey. I would therefore differ from your assessment of the Act saving the poorest countries £150m, as I think it likely that they will switch their activities to somewhere like Jersey. The first place to start is UK overseas territories such as Jersey, and the government should use its powers to extend the vulture funds law to all Crown Dependencies and British Overseas Territories as well.

    Having said that The UK vulture law is an amazing example of how the UK can stand up to the global finance industry, we can do things that are good and right and benefit the poorest countries, and news of our new good law needs to spread across the world!
    UNQUOTE

    So some unfinished business

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Andy Daer
    @Mark Frankel, yes, it would be nice and neat if it were true that "the Arabs" reject the two state solution. In fact, it is the leadership of the Israeli state...
  • Mark Frankel
    If you break into your neighbour's territory, murder 1200 of its people, kidnap hundreds more and use them to further weaken your neighbour's peace and security...
  • Mark Frankel
    Israel did not emerge from the ruins of the Ottoman Empire. It emerged from the ruins of the British Mandate in Palestine. The British tried to implement the ...
  • Andy Daer
    Tom is normally a reliable commentator, but his pessimism here is unjustified. Trump habitually rocks the boat with crazy ideas, and drops them if they turn out...
  • Roland
    @ Nonconformistradical Agree it’s a conundrum. Basically, the plans and thus the houses were sold on the “vision” of all the facilities being in place, ...