Governments must do more for survivors of same-sex sexual assault

There’s a strange fact which you may not know about the UK. You live in the world’s only country that tells the world that no person (man or woman) can ever be raped by a woman

Imagine telling a lesbian that they don’t count because their assaulter wasn’t a man? We live in a time where it is in vogue to put on a rainbow in June but gay or lesbian survivors of same-sex assault aren’t even recorded. Is this not the peak of homophobia? But this is our law.

Here’s another funny fact. We’re the world’s only jurisdiction that records sexual violence against men as a crime against women and girls. The state telling men who are sexually assaulted that they are actually women is one of the worst and most demeaning insults male survivors can endure. I know, because I am one. It implies that my manhood is gone because I was victimised. Alas, neither Labour or the Conservatives seem to think this is a big problem. 

The situation for male survivors especially is worsening. Today a little under half of crisis centres will turn men away from their door. But in 2025, the government is cutting the country’s only support line for male survivors. The cost of maintaining this line is not much, a mere £250,000 pa.

Empathy is a value that our party puts first. I am a survivor of sexual violence. I live in a world that is hostile to my existence.

On the one hand there are the usual suspects of far right grifters (i.e. the Brothers Tate) who say a real man can never be a victim. 

But on the other hand, there is the no less toxic view a real victim can never be a man. Tackling the first statement without the second will solve nothing. Both suffer from the sickness that my existence as survivor depends on a third-party’s assent. 

The Lib Dems ability to care is what separates us from the big two parties, which have lost contact with care as an idea itself. Kemi Badenoch even said the Lib Dems as the sort of ‘sock and sandal wearers that fixes the church roof.’ The Tories clearly have contempt for care in the community. 

This year, the drama Adolescence took the UK by storm. A drama centres around misogynistic violence from a teenage boy. The prime minister is demanding anti-misogyny classes for boys in response and a meeting with the showrunners. Perhaps a good start, but again only a start. Last year a drama about male-on-male sexual violence (Baby Reindeer) was the cause celebre of the season – it is yet to receive government policy announcements.

This coupled with the closure of our only support line proves Labour’s belief in the second lie, a real victim can never be a man. This attitude is especially egregious for other victims of same-sex violence.

Prisoners of the female estate are subject also to sexual violence by other females. By focussing on male-on-female violence, the female working-class population that disproportionately goes to prison is being swept under the rug. For a party which claims they are the ‘labour movement’ Labour has a very classist mind-set.  

All survivors of sexual violence have the right to have their story told. There is so much I want the world to know about the torment of being survivor. The PTSD attacks, the neurological problems caused by trauma, the fact I am 30 years old and have never had a partner, patronising help (‘you chose your career over relationships, good for you!’) and so on.

We have enough problems. A mountain of lies encouraged by my government has added to them.  Until something starts to change. My life is extremely uncomfortable. The generations to come with the same issue don’t have to tread the blighted path I have trod. But that won’t happen until something changes at the top.

Perhaps the largest issue is representation and casual erasure. Too often in the media the word survivor and woman are used interchangeably. Sexual crimes in the LGBT community are ignored. There are few individuals who can even be recognised as a face of survivors for men or the LGBT community. The government needs to change its recording method so sexual crimes against men are recorded as such – not crimes against women and girls.

Its clear this won’t happen overnight. Only sustained pressure from within Westminster and outside it will achieve anything close to justice. 

* John Jewers is a former councillor in the market town of Woodbridge. I have a master's in philosophy and public affairs, and a former researcher for the National Farm Research Unit. I am currently a cameraman and sound recordist based in East London.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Chris Moore 16th Jun '25 - 8:36am

    Actually, this COULD change overnight, if it was prioritised by the government.

    It doesn’t require investment, only a touch of awareness.

    Thank you for a very good article. I hope you will find full recovery comes with the years. All my best to you.

  • Yes and this appears to open up the the the thread to the Casey report, the PM’s change of stance and the response of politicians generally over the past 20 years or so to the Grooming issue. The statutory enquiry will conveniently push the matters back years but it may well surface at the time of the next election and come to haunt many of the current leading politicians of ALL parties.

    ,

  • A somewhat strange comment by Theakes. Why should the grooming enquiry come back to haunt the LibDems? If you’re referring to the late Mr Smith, then it is safe to say that no-one in the current MPs ever served with him in the House of Commons and none were in leadership roles when the accusations were made. In any event the accusations made against him were of being a paedophile, not that he was involved in grooming.
    As a party member of 60 years plus, I think I might have heard of any grooming accusations levied at people in the party.

  • An eye-opening, and brave, article. Changing the recording system seems a very simple change to make, and it seems crazy no government has ever done it.

  • Alex Macfie 17th Jun '25 - 9:48am

    Also “Hanger” Smith was a Labour member for much of his political career, including the time many of the allegations against him relate to.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

This post has pre moderation enabled, please be patient whilst waiting for it to be manually reviewed. Liberal Democrat Voice is made up of volunteers who keep the site running in their free time.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tim Rogers
    No problem with individual trades unionists donating to us but unions donating to us would be pounced on by the Tory press. We must not forget the voters who su...
  • David Le Grice
    Would trade unions even be willing to donate to us? To the extent they were able to tolerate Blair, Brown and Starmer it's largely been because of the Labours h...
  • Tristan Ward
    Sorry about the typo Jack. - completely unintended....
  • Jack Meredith
    In response to Tristan Ward: No need for the mocking tone, or to call me "kack". I just find it interesting that a party founded on the alliance on a liberal...
  • Tristan Ward
    @ Kack Meredith SHOCK HORROR - Leader of Liberal Democrats (elected by the membership nomless) is a actually a liberal!...