A computer stolen from Hazel Blears’s constituency office has turned out to contain sensitive government information on defence and extremism. As the BBC reports, it isn’t yet clear if this means Hazel Blears broke any rules on the handling of government information, but given the rules against holding such information on personal computers, for example, it is hard to see how the data could have ended up on the computer without someone breaking some rules.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Burnham has left a gap on tax. We should run through it. (Tom Reeve)
-
Should the Liberal Democrats support “None of the Above”? (Samuel Jackson)
-
Extending the school day: A catalyst for economic growth (Edward Marsh)
-
An open letter to Andy Burnham (Tony Vickers)
-
Four challenges in Andy Burnham’s in-tray (Callum Robertson)
-
Welcome aboard
-
50 years in business
-
A cross between Biggles, Tintin, the Famous Five and Fitzcarraldo
-
George Orwell on the style and quality of C.S. Lewis's arguments
-
London tram driven the wrong way through Croydon town centre
-
First Labour by-election gains of the Burnham Premiership
-
Mr Smith Goes To Washington
-
The problem with balancing budgets
-
Council by-election results scorecard 2026-2027
-
Dennis Potter's 1975 dramatisation of Angus Wilson's Late Call
Recent Comments
Peter Hirst
What is it that we want the media, the public and the world to take as the defining message of this conference? Most are not interested in the intricies of our ...- Peter Hirst
This country certainly needs something tangible that demonstrates to the world that it is becoming a different country. A wealth tax might do it if it is compr... - Peter Hirst
We could and perhaps should find people whose human rights are being abused and stand up for them. Whether it's an asylum seeker seaking refuge from persecution... 
Peter Davies
As anounced, the basic pension will remain taxable. In the past, this did not affect those whose only income was the state pension because they were below the t...
John C
I've always felt we should have a None Of The Above option on ballot papers. If it gets the most votes, it forces a fresh election where none of the original ca...
6 Comments
The translation of the “departmental spokesman”‘s remaks is simple. The computer contained “Confidential” and “Restricted” documents which should not have been there.
It also contained some indisceet material that was not classified.
I am unable to offer a translation of what the departmental spokesman carefully did not say.
When she was a Home Office Minister, Hazel Blears chaired a working group on Cyber Trust and Crime Prevention, and wrote a preface for the executive summary which the group produced, so she’s well aware of the issues surrounding computer security.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha talk about hoist by her own petard!
* sits back and waits for Fate to take his revenge on her for schadenfreude *
It’ll all be the fault of a junior/ temporary/ casual/ contract/ illegally-present-in-the-UK member of staff, who has since left the employment/ service/ country/ planet, and no further action would be appropriate.
Mark my words.
While Labour MP’s are doing their best to continue an incompetant run of losing sensitive documents, the Tories have still got their snouts in the trough filching expenses:
Latest Tory sleaze here
“Two Tory MPs, Sir Nicholas Winterton and his wife Ann, were in “unequivocal” breach of Parliamentary rules by claiming over £165,000 in rent on a property which they had bought outright, MPs have concluded.”
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4164118.ece
If he actually sacked all the sleazebags in his party, Cameron wouldn’t have many MP’s or MEP’s left.
The government’s Protective Marking Scheme classifies sensitive documents in four categories according to the damage that would be done if they were improperly disclosed. The categories are (in decreasing level of sensitivity) Top Secret, Secret, Confidential and Restricted.
http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/foi/reading_room/topic/~/media/assets/www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/foi/classifications%20pdf.ashx
Saying that the computer didn’t have any Secret or Top Secret material on it invites us the infer that it had Confidential material on it. What does that mean? Well the definition of “Confidential” is:
“The compromise of this information or material would be likely: materially to damage diplomatic relations (i.e. cause formal protest or other sanction); to prejudice individual security or liberty; to cause damage to the operational effectiveness or security of UK or allied forces or the effectiveness of valuable security or intelligence operations; to work substantially against national finances or economic and commercial interests; substantially to undermine the financial viability of major organisations; to impede the investigation or facilitate the commission of serious crime; to impede seriously the development or operation of major government policies; to shut down or otherwise substantially disrupt significant national operations.”