A computer stolen from Hazel Blears’s constituency office has turned out to contain sensitive government information on defence and extremism. As the BBC reports, it isn’t yet clear if this means Hazel Blears broke any rules on the handling of government information, but given the rules against holding such information on personal computers, for example, it is hard to see how the data could have ended up on the computer without someone breaking some rules.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Reflections on the Hungarian Election (Theo Brown)
-
How to stop Labour stealing our lunch on Europe (Blaise Baquiche)
-
Mississippi: Historic change has come at last (The Voice)
-
The only Tory MP to join the SDP (Cody Butler)
-
A Proposed Alternative to Coalition: The Reserved Time Confidence Agreement (Owen Driscoll)
-
A 14-year-old Mick Jagger demonstrates rock climbing on television
-
Prisons
-
The Joy of Six 1606
-
Why Kierkegaard should be the official philosopher of Scotland supporters
-
Summer drought means no jump meetings at Ludlow this winter
-
Labour makes by-election gain in PM's own constituency
-
An extended period of silence is called for
Recent Comments
PM
@ Russell, So you are saying the Windrush and other Caribbean migrants, most migrants from counties like Nigeria, India etc have been a drain on the economy....
Denis Mollison
I was at the announcement (in Wadebridge I think) of the result in April 1966 when John Pardoe won it back from the Conservatives! Good to see this repeated at ...
Mick Taylor
The really shocking thing about the mid-term elections is that less than half of those able to vote did so. This whole blue tsunami happened on a turnout of jus...
David Evans
So the leader who chose to cosy up to the Conservatives for five years even though the impact on our party was clear from 6 months in and things just kept on ge...
Tristan Ward
@Jana That sounds very much like moving to the right" No: it is occupying space that is liberal and has always been liberal, but which has been partly occ...
6 Comments
The translation of the “departmental spokesman”‘s remaks is simple. The computer contained “Confidential” and “Restricted” documents which should not have been there.
It also contained some indisceet material that was not classified.
I am unable to offer a translation of what the departmental spokesman carefully did not say.
When she was a Home Office Minister, Hazel Blears chaired a working group on Cyber Trust and Crime Prevention, and wrote a preface for the executive summary which the group produced, so she’s well aware of the issues surrounding computer security.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha talk about hoist by her own petard!
* sits back and waits for Fate to take his revenge on her for schadenfreude *
It’ll all be the fault of a junior/ temporary/ casual/ contract/ illegally-present-in-the-UK member of staff, who has since left the employment/ service/ country/ planet, and no further action would be appropriate.
Mark my words.
While Labour MP’s are doing their best to continue an incompetant run of losing sensitive documents, the Tories have still got their snouts in the trough filching expenses:
Latest Tory sleaze here
“Two Tory MPs, Sir Nicholas Winterton and his wife Ann, were in “unequivocal” breach of Parliamentary rules by claiming over £165,000 in rent on a property which they had bought outright, MPs have concluded.”
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4164118.ece
If he actually sacked all the sleazebags in his party, Cameron wouldn’t have many MP’s or MEP’s left.
The government’s Protective Marking Scheme classifies sensitive documents in four categories according to the damage that would be done if they were improperly disclosed. The categories are (in decreasing level of sensitivity) Top Secret, Secret, Confidential and Restricted.
http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/foi/reading_room/topic/~/media/assets/www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/foi/classifications%20pdf.ashx
Saying that the computer didn’t have any Secret or Top Secret material on it invites us the infer that it had Confidential material on it. What does that mean? Well the definition of “Confidential” is:
“The compromise of this information or material would be likely: materially to damage diplomatic relations (i.e. cause formal protest or other sanction); to prejudice individual security or liberty; to cause damage to the operational effectiveness or security of UK or allied forces or the effectiveness of valuable security or intelligence operations; to work substantially against national finances or economic and commercial interests; substantially to undermine the financial viability of major organisations; to impede the investigation or facilitate the commission of serious crime; to impede seriously the development or operation of major government policies; to shut down or otherwise substantially disrupt significant national operations.”