The Voice

Henley by-election: HQ opens Friday

By | Thu 8th May 2008 - 11:30 am

We previously blogged Nick Clegg’s message asking people to help in Crewe (polling day a fortnight today). Now here’s a message about Henley, which is also gearing up for a by-election campaign, on the assumption that Boris Johnson keeps to his promise to quit as an MP:

As the film says, the Henley Campaign HQ will open at 9am on Friday 9th May: 0845 680 1131, [email protected]. There is much more information including maps, train information, directions by road, sat nav details and more at www.henleylibdems.org.uk/henleyhq/

UPDATE: A furious internal row has blown up amongst the Conservatives over the selection of their candidate, with David Cameron having to personally meet the local party to try to get them to change their plans. You can read more about the Conservative Henley splits here.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Lib Dem TV.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tim
    @PM. Yes, allowing a LOT more houses to be built would reduce wealth inequality dramatically. We should aim to return to the c1997 price to income ratios - whic...
  • Peter Davies
    and building more houses of course....
  • Peter Davies
    The rising property market contributed more to the impoverishment of the poor than the enrichment of the rich. It is owner occupiers who hold the greatest propo...
  • PM
    @ Tim, You may be technically correct with your argument but it doesn't change the fact that we have become very much more unequal in recent decades. The ...
  • Mick Taylor
    @ColinMurphy. Yes and you could close all the tax loopholes and greatly reduce the huge number of pages in the tax codes that take a highly qualified accountant...