How will the BBC cover the 2010 general election?

The BBC has just published a draft of the internal guidelines for its election coverage. The 14 page document is similar to the guidance at previous elections and includes a set of sensible rules which other media outlets would do well to emulate, including:

There will be no online votes or SMS/text votes attempting to quantify support for a party, a politician or a party political policy issue.

Given the risks of party supporters attempting to pack audience feedback sections, the guidelines also wisely say:

The BBC will not broadcast or publish numbers of e-mails, texts or other communications received on either side of any issue connected to the campaign.

On balance of coverage between the parties, the key criteria is:

Previous electoral support in equivalent elections is the starting point for making judgements about the proportionate levels of coverage between parties.

However, other factors can be taken into account where appropriate, including evidence of variation in levels of support in more recent elections, changed political circumstances (e.g. new parties or party splits) as well as other evidence of current support. The number of candidates a party is standing may also be a factor.

What this does not address head on is that only a minority of seats are now Labour-Conservative contests. The majority either have someone else in first or second, or are three way (or more) contests. Coverage which is dominated by Labour and the Conservatives (which is what the form of words implies) will in fact end up not reflecting the actual contests in the majority of the country.

The expected brevity of reporting is highlighted by the comment that:

Full-length reports (e.g. 3 or 4 minute packages) about specific electoral areas should refer – as a minimum – to an online list of all candidates and parties standing.

When a “full-length” report is only 3 or 4 minutes, this is not going to be an election where we can expect much in the way of in-depth reports from the BBC.

Despite these caveats, the overall tenor of the BBC’s intentions is good – and far better than what is often seen in local newspapers with the idea of “balance” at election time becoming an excuse either to report nothing or only to allow very brief, turgid snippets. Instead, the BBC says:

The intention of these guidelines is to encourage vigorous debate and to give a higher profile to candidates of all parties in general without giving unfair advantage to one candidate or party over another.

The BBC’s draft guidelines also repeat what is now long standing BBC policy of not commissioning opinion polls to ascertain voting intention levels. Although the policy was originally born in large part by doubts over the accuracy of opinion polls and the wisdom of focusing on the horse race nature of politics, it is also now the case that there are so many general voting intention polls (even hitting record levels) that the BBC hardly needs to add to the number.

Freed from the burden which media outlets feel of the need to headline and big up their own polls, the BBC could fill a useful role in reporting polls – and calling out the exaggerated reporting of small shifts as major moves. The guidelines are hopeful on this, saying the BBC’s policy is

to report the findings of voting intentions polls in the context of trend. The trend may consist of the results of all major polls over a period or may be limited to the change in a single pollster’s findings. Poll results which defy trends without convincing explanation should be treated with particular scepticism and caution.

The guidelines cover both the general election and May’s round of local elections. Assuming nothing dramatic happens on the dates for these, the guidelines in their final form will come into force on 29th March.

Here are the full guidelines:

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in General Election and News.


  • Hereward the Wake 25th Jan '10 - 1:35pm

    How will the BBC cover the 2010 general election?

    I don’t think there is any fear of them displaying a Conservative/Right Wing bias. It will be absolutely amazing if they manage to control the left-wing luvvies who predominate and constantly skew any current affairs/political programming towards Labour and the left.

  • How will they cover it? With insidious bias.
    They will give total support to this incompetent government (and to try to protect their jobs), with occasional forays to support Lib Dems as insurance that they could form a major support in a hung parliament.
    Finally reluctant short interviews with Conservatives, but with constant interruptions and the usual shouting out of the message ending in snide comments afterwards, such as James Naughty did after interviewing a banker about Cameron’s Obama banking viewpoint, stating his position being “totally bonkers”.

  • Cassandrina, The tories will probably use this ‘evidence’ of bias to start the dismantling of the BBC and sale to Rupert Murdoch. Part of the price for the support of the Sun.

  • Personally I have no time for any of the 3 major parties and their leaders.
    But we are back to 1996 in which the then incumbent government had run out of ideas and really did not wish to be re-elected – so it was a no brainer.
    Today we have a similar situation but with the addition of sleaze, arrogance, and a definate willingness to carry on as our government in spite of their useless record.
    They got away with 11 years of misrule (first year was good) because the two opposition parties did not do their job effectively. Compare this with the Republican fight back in the USA, and they are without a credible leader.
    No matter which party/parties get into power in the UK, we are in a rapidly increasing downward spiral.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • David Allen
    Not all wars are like WW2. Some, like Korea, end in stalemate. Others, like Afghanistan, end very badly. In WW2, the Allies didn't only reject appeasement....
  • Chris Rennard
    It is sometimes claimed that we “underperformed” in 2005 when I was Chief Executive and Charles Kennedy was Leader. But electing 62 MPs, tripling our Westm...
  • David Raw
    Michael Bukola hits the spot. My advice to Sir Edward would be to avoid any interview with Andrew Neil under any and every circumstance....
  • Chris Rennard
    I do not think that those people seeking to see a sharper focus for us on some high profile issues are seeking for us to be a “think tank”. Whilst I would ...
  • David Raw
    @ Paul Fox. Some good and interesting points, Paul, and of course Paddy had charisma, an interesting hinterland, and could make an inspiring speech....