Hutton review publishes its interim report into fair pay in the public sector

Yesterday saw the publication of the interim report from Will Hutton’s Review of Fair Pay in the Public Sector, commissioned by the government.

The bald headline from the report is one of modest reform: moving toward recommending the introduction of a 20:1 maximum ratio between the top and bottom salary in any public body. This ratio is more generous than existing pay arrangements, but it is more radical than that superficially makes it appear.

First, the ratio has been increasingly and is likely to continue to do so, particularly with public sector structural reforms the government is planning. So introducing a cap that looks modest now may yet have a radical impact in the future.

Second, as I wrote in June:

It provides a fair pay benchmark which campaigners, pressure groups and the public can use more widely. Whatever is decided to be the formal extent of its applicability, there is nothing to stop people pushing for its wider adoption and there is good evidence that pay at the very top of the private sector has got out of control, increasing far faster than profits, turnover or other performance would justify. Partly because of the number of firms who set their top pay saying that it must compare well with the rest of the sector, there has been a self-reinforcing upward spiral in pay as everyone pushes up everyone else’s top pay.

A 20:1 ratio would still allow for generous top pay, but stop that cycle – if it ends up applying more widely. Whether or not that happens is not just a matter for central government. For example, even if the government holding the majority of shares in a bank does not mean the 20:1 ratio applies to that bank, that doesn’t stop a campaign to introduce such a ratio. The use of the 20:1 ratio across large parts of the economy will provide a clear benchmark that will make those sort of wider campaigns more effective.

It’s easy to see how over time the 20:1 ratio could become a standard applied to suppliers to the public sector, by ethical investment funds, by good corporate practice lobbyists and more.

The full report (or at least the executive summary) is well worth a read, particularly for information such as this graph:

Fair Pay graph

Will Hutton Review of Fair Pay Interim Report

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Will these reforms be applied to the executive pay of the banks the public currrently own a huge chunk of?
    No.
    They will not.
    And it’s laughably unlikely that any private sector firms are going to voluntarily adopt the 20:1 ratio.
    I didn’t see much sign of ‘moral’ behaviour during the bank crisis and the price gouging behaviour of the energy companies right now is equally contemptable.

    But these pay constraints might keep the right wingers happy as it feeds into the public sector bashing narrative that Cameron and Osborne have been running so enthusiastically.

    Of course they are pretty meaningless since the 20:1 ratio doesn’t currently affect anyone in the public sector as you concede, but the headlines will be enough to satisfy Cameron’s right wing. And that, after all, is about the only thing that seems to matter these days.

  • @LDV Bob:
    I’ll put money down that a number of private companies would quickly start adopting the rule if the public sector did. Those that refuse to will become known to the public and they can adjust their purchasing habits accordingly.

  • Liberal Neil 2nd Dec '10 - 2:35pm

    How sad that we live in a society where the suggestion that there should be a 20:1 ratio between the highest and lowest paid employees in a public sector organisation is considered ‘radical’.

  • When Hutton was speaking on 5 Live yesterday, he was talking about 20x median pay, not 20x the lowest. His example was the BBC where lowest pay is about £18,000, which would give a maximum of £360,000, but Hutton’s example was 20x £36,000 median pay, which left Senior Executives earning £720,000 a year.

  • Why on earth would anyone take anything Will Hutton said seriously. While the 180k Chief Exce of the Work Foundation he drove it into bankruptcy with a £26m pension deficit.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 5th Jun - 1:07pm
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Lee We were repeatedly warned, but what, in practice could we do?
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 5th Jun - 1:04pm
    Frank West 5th Jun '20 - 9:00am Please go back to the circumstances in which a British Conservative government said that 'Hong Kong is a...
  • User AvatarFrank West 5th Jun - 1:00pm
    I would not write Trump off yet, he seems to bounce back from imminent disaster and Americans are much more flexible in their work than...
  • User AvatarJohn Probert 5th Jun - 12:57pm
    Thank you Larry for revealing the true cost of Dominic Raab's beau geste, offering British National (Overseas) passport holders in Hong Kong the right to...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 5th Jun - 12:55pm
    The tag "No recourse to public funds" has recently been raised at PMQ and Boris Al Johnson appears to be unsympathetic. He and his Home...
  • User Avatartheakes 5th Jun - 11:54am
    Since the police custody death in Minnesota and the following demonstrations Trumps approval rating has turned mround and is now heading back up, whilst the...