In Full: Nick Clegg on tearing down the barriers facing women at work and the £23 billion boost if we get it right

Clegg Speech 40I have always said that if I had to pick one policy enacted by the Coalition that summed up our liberal values it would be the revolution that Nick Clegg and Jo Swinson have enacted on parental leave. From next year, parents will be able to choose how they split parental leave following a birth or adoption between them rather than the mother having to take it all. It’s the stronger economy, fairer society and enabling people to get on in life all in one.

Yesterday, Nick Clegg made a speech in which he explained the reasons for this and talked about how we need to get more women into senior positions in companies. He said that we could boost our GDP by £23 billion if we tackled the barriers facing women in employment. He talked about encouraging girls in science based careers and challenged employers to make family friendly working the new norm.

His whole speech is worth reading, so here it is:

Forty years ago, when women were first being allowed onto the trading floor of the London Stock Exchange, any talk of families in the workplace was confined to a framed photo on your desk.

Mothers were almost always expected to stay at home and an event like this just wouldn’t have happened.

Now we have the highest female employment rate on record, with 630,000 extra women in employment since 2010. And networks like City Mothers and Fathers show how many more parents are choosing to both earn and share their childcare responsibilities between them.

Yet the enormity of the challenge we face – to ensure genuine equality in work and across our society – requires even more radical change.

First, we have to sweep away those Edwardian rules which still hold back those families working hard to juggle their responsibilities at home and work.

For decades, our parental leave system has been based on the assumption that it’s dad who goes out to work while mum cares for the kids – giving fathers two weeks off when your baby is first born and mothers up to a year.

But what about those households where the woman is the main earner? Or the families where a working father just wants to spend more time with his children, or both parents want to do their bit at home without sacrificing their careers?

In many ways, the system still treats these families as the exception not the norm.

As a Liberal, I’ve always believed the system should support not dictate our families’ choices. That’s why I, and the Liberal Democrats,have made building a Britain that’s fit for modern families one of our biggest priorities in Government.

So we’ve worked hard to increase access to affordable, high-quality childcare for more families. And, from 2015, Government is investing an extra £750 million in tax-free childcare: to help more working parents with children under 12 cover their childcare bill. This is support worth up to £2,000 a year per child for millions of families.

This is in addition to our offer of 15 hours a week of free early years’ education for every 3 and 4 year old, as well as for 2 year olds in those families most feeling the squeeze.

Most importantly, I’ve also fought to drag those clapped out rules into the 21st Century.

And, from next year, if a mother wants to return to work before her year’s maternity leave is up or go back to work for a particular project, she can – without losing out. Her partner will now be entitled to use up her remaining parental leave and pay, if that’s what they want. You can even – as parents – take off chunks of time together.

Yet changing laws like this is only the start. Culturally, we also need to recognise that we can’t build a more family-friendly Britain unless all of us see the world differently.

We need to tackle once and for all the hidden prejudices which still limit the choices of many men and women. And we need to create the same equal opportunities for both sexes to care as well as earn.

How do we do that?

Well, we’ve got to tear down those barriers which still prevent too many brilliant women from reaching the top of their professions. For example, despite progress in recent years, women still account for just

21% of board positions on FTSE 100 companies. And only four of those companies have a female CEO.

That impacts on all of us, with estimates showing that the UK could boost its GDP by up to £23 billion if we use the skills of our female workforce more effectively.

Parents and teachers have an incredibly important role to play here: inspiring every young girl to think big and aim high for their future. If they’ve got the talent and ambition to succeed, then no job should be closed off to them – whether it’s to build their own business, lead a top company or work at the cutting edge of science, technology or engineering.

This is also why brilliant campaigns like Inspiring Women, which Miriam is heavily involved in, are so important: to help more young women reach for the sky.

Government is doing its bit to help too: boosting support for female entrepreneurs, pushing for more women on boards and helping young girls see the full range of career options open to them, including in those traditionally male-dominated STEM industries.

But at the same time, we also need to encourage more boys to see the value of building a career in the caring professions. For too long, these kinds of jobs – in childcare, early years’ education and social care – have typically been seen as the preserve of women. There are around 4 million people working in health and social care jobs in the UK today and still four out of every five people working in those jobs are women.

Yet these are fields in which both men and women have a lot to offer and can excel. We are now starting to see that kind of change in nursing. But I want to see it happen right across the board: helping more people to make choices based on what’s right for them not

outdated preconceptions about their gender.

Of course, if we’re to do it properly, then we also need to challenge the ways in which many fathers are still pushed to see themselves as a breadwinner first and carer second.

Whether it’s by a manager’s raised eyebrow when you ask for some family time off. Or your friends’ surprise when you say you’d like to be a stay at home parent if you could. Or your own ingrained fear that, if you choose to work more flexibly, you’ll find your career stuck in the slow lane and your peers overtaking you.

As your survey shows, it’s as if even asking to work differently marks you out as less committed, ambitious or capable than your colleagues without children. And according to official research, fathers are less likely to work part-time than other employed men. In fact, around a quarter of new fathers take only a week or less of paternity leave.

This is despite increasing numbers of employers, both big and small, which now recognise the benefits of work-life balance, such as a more productive, loyal and engaged work force. This includes many of your own employers, companies like KPMG, Citi, Lloyds, EY and others.

Yet that kind of fantastic corporate support still isn’t translating into the wholesale shift in attitudes we need. That’s especially true in jobs with an entrenched long hours’ culture like here in the City.

We’re all familiar with the objections that come up again and again when changes like this are proposed: “It’s bad for our economy.”… “This is an additional burden businesses just don’t need.”… “It’s going to make us less competitive.”

Yet the reality is that countries like Switzerland, Sweden and the Netherlands which actively champion more family-friendly working arrangements are consistently rated amongst the top economies on

global competitiveness and well-being.

UK research also shows that employees working flexibly are more prepared to go that extra mile. And, more widely, McGill University academics argue that family-friendly policies help to reduce staff turnover, boost performance and improve job satisfaction.

As you can see in almost every political debate these days, there’s a big difference emerging between those who want Britain to be open or closed and ready to change or anxious to turn the clock back.

I’m clear on that fundamental dividing line. I believe we should always point to the future not hanker after the past. And the simple reality is that we always see resistance to these types of reforms in the early days, but they rapidly become the norm.

As representatives of some of the UK’s leading organisations, you can help us make that happen now. By working with us to ensure every family who can benefit from these new rights is able to do so, including your own, we can make family-friendly working the new norm in Britain.

That means ensuring it’s a genuine option for every employee who works in your organisation. From the men and women serving meals in your canteen and cleaning your offices to those sitting in the boardroom.

Getting the chance to take these opportunities is always harder for those families on the lowest incomes. So talk to your bosses, customers and business partners. And together we can generate a once-in-a-generation chain reaction across our offices, factories and other workplaces.

As competition increases, no successful business leader would think twice about investing in the latest technology to help their business

page5image15232 page5image15392 page5image15552

get ahead. In the same way, we need to show how an upgrade in old- fashioned attitudes to flexible working can sharpen competitiveness even more.

That’s the only way we’ll secure the best, most talented and diverse workforce for Britain’s success. Together we can ensure that, in the City and beyond, every British family – whatever their background or circumstances – gets an equal chance to thrive. 

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • I’m all for “family-friendly” policies as long as they are not “business-hostile” and also damaging to the workplace interests of those who do not have children.

    At the moment, certain aspects of maternity law are deeply damaging to small business, in particular not knowing whether someone is going to come back to occupy their previous post. I have seen friends of mine trying to manage departments tied in knots over recruitment of replacement staff, not knowing how long the situation is going to last. When managing a small team of skilled people, such difficulties can become enormous.

    I also have other friends who, when colleagues have parental duties to attend to, end up shouldering the burden of work because employers know they will put their professional commitments first and personal lives second.

    We need to have a balanced, intelligent approach to furthering this agenda. It is very far from being a simple, win-win all round situation.

  • Sal Brinton 24th Apr '14 - 1:49pm

    Nick’s speech was very important, and how encouraging that City Fathers has been set up, and had such a great launch with Nick. When we discussed flexible parental in the Lords in the Children and Families Bill recently, I said that this was a key Lib Dem policy that Jo Swinson was championing as BIS minister: this is something that will really change people’s attitudes to young working women, because even though employers cannot discriminate against women who might have children, we all know that they have done. I’ve had businessmen saying to me that they just won’t employ women of a certain age., in case they get pregnant.
    It is vital that both parents have the right to share parental leave in the way that is most helpful to them as a young family, and I believe that it will also provide the building blocks for that sea change of attitude.
    Jo’s maternity leave as a Minister (with Jenny covering for her) is also a first. I look forward to the first ministerial father taking his share of parental leave in the future!

  • Talk about throwing stones in glass houses.

    Remind me how many female MPs we have, Nick?

  • Sal Brinton 24th Apr '14 - 5:03pm

    Nice try, Will.
    As a party member you will know that Nick is not responsible for the number of women MPs. That’s down to local selection, and then the election. However, after the 2010 General Election Nick, Ros Scott & Tim Farron, FE and Conference agreed that we need all of us to change the current poor numbers but unlike the other parties we believe in devolving decisions down to local parties.
    We’ve trained and supported excellent women candidates, and they are being selected. The good news is that 5 out of the 7 local parties where MPs are standing down have selected women candidates (2 of these are currently held by women at present).

  • @Sal Brinton I appreciate there are some high-minded principles involved – but to the outside world, and particularly the women in the outside world, the numbers look terrible. Admirable though Nick’s intentions may be, when he bangs on about the lack of women in FTSE boardrooms, he’s open to a charge of hypocrisy given how few female MPs are in his own party.

  • Sal “As a party member you will know that Nick is not responsible for the number of women MPs”

    Is Nick responsible for the number of Lib Dem women in the Cabinet?

  • Will ” but to the outside world, and particularly the women in the outside world, the numbers look terrible”

    It’s not just the numbers although that is a very powerful point. To many of us women on the outside as it were, the Lib Dem Party looks like a very unsafe place to be.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Adam Robertson
    @Peter Martin - How many seats did the Lib Dems win simply because the Tory/Reform was split? Yes we won seats because the Tory/Reform vote was split. However, ...
  • David Raw
    @ Tristan Ward I'm afraid Winston Churchill came a thousand years later than, "the early 10th century Liberal Party", and I'm afraid the good folk of Dundee...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Alex, “How many seats did the Lib Dems win simply because the Tory/Reform vote was split?” "Probably not very many actually." "Actual...
  • David Raw
    @ Tristan Ward Lessons of History ? Not advisable to ride on the back of an alligator, no matter how vulnerable and docile it may appear at first sight ....
  • Tristan Ward
    @David Raw Yes it was the alliance between liberal forces and conservative forces that led to the decline in the early 10th century Liberal Party. But liber...