Individual electoral registration: this is how government is meant to work

Electoral register formVia a slightly odd story in the Daily Telegraph comes the news that Nick Clegg is pushing for the current legal penalties for not returning electoral registration forms to be continued when individual electoral registration is introduced.

I say slightly odd, because Tim Ross’s report misses out nearly all of the context, simply talking about:

Nick Clegg, the deputy prime minister, is backing proposals to ensure that every individual is responsible for registering themselves on the electoral roll.

However, ministers fear that thousands of young people, particularly students moving house after leaving university, fail to re-register and fall out of the system.

The Liberal Democrat leader is understood to have been convinced that some form of sanction will be necessary to force potential voters to register.

So here’s the context the piece misses:

  1. The government is moving to individual electoral registration, implementing a decision made by the previous Labour government and widely supported across the political spectrum.
  2. Under the current system, there is a legal obligation for household electoral registration forms to be returned. There has been controversy over suggestions that there would not be any similar legal obligation under individual registration.
  3. In response to the controversy, and in particular the views expressed by a cross-party Parliamentary Committee and by the independent Electoral Commission, Nick Clegg announced the government was thinking again.

So the story in short is: government makes proposal, consults on proposal and then responds to views expressed. Sort of how government and consultation is meant to work…

 

 

* Mark Pack is Party President and is the editor of Liberal Democrat Newswire.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Advert

One Comment

  • Can you remind us what the existing penalties are Mark? It’s always useful to have chapter and verse when being attacked groundlessly.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jonathan Parry
    This is an interesting article. One Nation Toryism never got going until the demise of the Liberals in the 1920s (Disraeli certainly never practised it). To t...
  • Peter Davies
    In Latin it may be a gerund but in English it's a noun. If I were to object to the Government's referending of the public, that would be a gerund....
  • Alex Macfie
    Except that "referendum" is not a Latin 2nd Declension Neuter noun. It's a gerundive; as such it is used in English differently from Latin so should take an Eng...
  • PM
    @ PM, It can be either. I do remember from my schooldays that the plural in Latin involved replacing the 'um' of a neuter noun by an 'a'. I must have managed...
  • Alex Macfie
    It's "referendums"....