Indy bigs up Mark Pack but exposes Twitter’s weakness

The Independent today asksCould the next election finally provide a reason for the [Twitter] microblogging service?

There are many reasons for Twitter, some better than others, but if today’s Independent article is anything to go by, the General Election won’t be one of them.

“It’s Twitter that will make this election unique.”, the Indy proclaims, before going on to show why that claim is almost certainly not true.

The paper lists the political twitterati, a mixture – it turns out – of established figures doing a bit of tweeting and political bloggers.

Most excitingly for us at Lib Dem Voice, our very own Mark Pack snuggles between Vince Cable and Lynne Featherstone as one of three “Liberals” (I could have sworn the party changed its name a couple of decades ago) on the list.

Likewise for the other parties, names familiar to the blogging fraternity but unknown to the wider millions of voters (Iain Dale, Tim Montgomerie, Tory Bear, Ellie Gellard) snuggle up with a handful of better known political figures (Alastair Campbell, John Prescott).

But look at the number of followers.

Amongst those tweeting from a political party standpoint, the number of followers of these microblogging kings and queens stretches from around 12,000 at the top (Campbell, Prescott) down to between one and two thousand (still a great deal more followers than I’ve got, by the way).

Iain Dale, one of the two top bloggers in the country, has 7,299 followers.

Now reflect on how you win General Elections. You focus on the floating voters in your marginal constituencies.

None of the political twitterers has more followers than there are residents in a single metropolitan borough ward, never mind parliamentary constituency.

How many votes can Iain Dale seriously swing in key Tory target seats? A handful at best.

In contrast, targeted mail, leaflets, posters and mainstream media coverage reaches millions of people across the country and, the case of the first three, can be directed to those areas where they’re most needed.

Does Twitter enable those Twitterers to get positive attention they would otherwise not have managed, that leads onto vote-winning media coverage? Rarely.

Twitter may be an excellent way for reaching friends, colleagues, supporters and followers. It may well be a useful communication tool in some circumstances.

But a General Election game changer? Not this year.

Read more by or more about , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Online politics and Op-eds.


  • Twitter may be an excellent way for reaching friends, colleagues, supporters and followers

    Do you really think it even does that compared to FB? I’m still scratching my head as to its uses. It seems a gimmick that will look like flared trousers at the end of this decade.

  • I use twitter to get the news via twitter feeds and by following a few freelance journalists and bloggers. As a source of news and political gossip it is excellant but I don’t know how well it would work for speaking to voters. A politician could reach me through twitter if I already knew of and respected them. And I’m a bit of a news junky, so it seems to me that it is a terrible way of reaching ordinary, non-alligned voters. Certainly no one will be elected if all they do is tweet (unless the other candidates don’t campaign at all)

  • Crispin Driver 10th Feb '17 - 10:27am

    Reading this a few years on, and it is remarkable how things have changed – to the extent that we now have a US President who seems to be using Twitter as his prime, unfiltered public communication channel.

    On a more positive note, Twitter is now an essential *part* of the whole communications mix and we write it off at our peril. At the very least, for activists it can be a very effective way of engaging directly with others at all levels – people who it would simply not be possible to make contact with via more conventional means.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGlenn 30th May - 4:19am
    George Kendall But they didn't all have extensive lockdowns. Maybe testing actually reduces mortality figures by demonstrating that the virus is simply not as lethal...
  • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 30th May - 3:02am
    @Glenn (1/2) Thanks for the reply. I know a few experts share your opinion. Most don't, but that doesn't make you wrong. For me, I'm...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 30th May - 2:26am
    This article asks the readers of LDV some questions: Do our five current proposed social ills cover all the social ills we as a party...
  • User AvatarGlenn 30th May - 12:35am
    George Kendall I disagree. There is growing evidence that at best there is very little difference between countries that adopted lockdowns than those that didn't....
  • User AvatarManfarang 29th May - 11:43pm
    I will always remember organising jumble sales. The amount of good stuff people would throw away.
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 29th May - 11:37pm
    David Raw, it is true you can’t tell Brentford supporters anything, not even other Brentford supporters can. The recent Libdem manifesto would see public spending...