Is the party in a fix over its Euro referendum tactics?

The Spectator’s Coffee House blog is reporting that the House of Commons clerks have kaiboshed Lib Dem plans to call for a referendum on the UK’s membership of the European Union when Parliament debates the Lisbon (European reform) treaty:

They have apparently told the Lib Dems that they can not put down an amendment to the European Union (Ammendment) [sic] Bill demanding a referendum on EU membership because it is nothing to do with the Lisbon Treaty. This blows apart the Lib Dem plan to have it both ways and spend the debate demanding a referendum but not on the Treaty itself.

If true, this will indeed make for some tricky decisions in Nick Clegg’s first weeks as leader. The compromise of a referendum on ‘the only question that matters’ was designed to bridge the gulf between those in the party who believe a referendum cannot possibly deal with the intricacies of a Treaty; and those who think a party which advocates ‘people not politicians in charge’, which voted in favour of a referendum on Maastricht (unlike either the Tories or Labour), and which promised a debate on the now-defunct European Constitution cannot possibly line up with the Government to deny the British electorate their say.

When LDV polled readers back in September, a majority agreed that the Lib Dems should back calls for a referendum on the Treaty.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Rose Runswick
    Thank you for saying this, international law is our best hope for a fairer and more peaceful world, I worry the memory of why it came about in the first place i...
  • Tristan Ward
    Sanctions should absolutely continue, but the idea that Britain should not rearm is to repeat the mistakes of the 1930s. Appeasement is not an option....
  • Katharine Pindar
    Paul Barker: you are right, Paul, in the wider world we do seem largely invisible. That was for instance clear in today's Laura Kuennsberg show when, you could ...
  • tom arms
    The first known use of the phrase "May you live in interesting times" was towards the end of the 19th century when Joseph Chamberlain used it in several speech...
  • Andy Daer
    John is, of course, right to remind us all of the need to uphold international law. Today we've seen Trump congratulate the man he had previously distanced h...