It’s Pride month – protest has not been needed this much for a long time

In a week where Nigel Farage seems to have had the stage to himself to talk about his plans to do away with anything remotely woke and to get women, British women that is, (and we all know what he mean by that) to have lots of babies, to ruminate on curtailing access to abortion, we can see that the right are not going to stop curtailing people’s freedoms once they’ve dealt with trans people.

This year’s Pride month comes as the rights of trans people have already been rolled back as a result of over-zealous interpretation of April’s Supreme Court Judgement. The Scottish Parliament announced that trans people would have to use gender neutral toilets at Holyrood and that male and female facilities would be based on “biological sex.” That is hugely problematic as it could require staffers to out themselves. That is why if I were there, I would feel that I would need to use the gender neutral facilities in solidarity.

Alex Cole-Hamilton questioned the Parliament’s Corporate Body about this last week after he was a signatory to a cross-party open letter expressing concern about the changes:

Christine Grahame suggests that the decision was taken on the basis of the need to balance the legal responsibilities of the Parliament related to the Supreme Court judgment. However, as we heard from Patrick Harvie, the former Supreme Court Justice Lord Sumption has made it clear that there are no legal responsibilities for the Parliament. He said that judges did not take a side and that the judgment does not provide an obligation to create single-sex spaces—it is a matter of choice for institutions. The EHRC has been challenged on how it will police that. We have heard about the use of birth certificates. I understand that the SPCB does not expect this to be policed, but others may. Can I ask that no parliamentary staff member will be put in the position of having to challenge a toilet user in the future?

Contrary to the view that this subject is simply a load of nonsense, many members are far more concerned about the wellbeing of those who choose to make the Parliament their workplace. We owe them dignity and respect. Given the answer to a previous question, I ask the corporate body simply to ensure that the aforementioned complaints procedure must not and will not be used as a means of prejudicing anyone in the Parliament, nor to force the disclosure of any details of their private life, including their status relative to their gender.
We have seen backlashes like this before. 21 years after Roy Jenkins as Home Secretary legalised homosexuality came Section 28 which made it impossible for LGBT young people to seek or receive support at school. The impact this had on many of my friends was profound and they have never forgotten how stigmatised they felt.

Similarly a couple of decades after things like the equalisation of the age of consent, the Gender Recognition Act and same sex marriage, we are now seeing a backlash which seems even more ferocious in nature, fuelled as it is by social media. Trans people are the current focus but the anti trans rhetoric also kicks up problems for anyone else who is not a cisgender white male, not least women who don’t conform to what people think a woman should look like.
When the Supreme Court Judgement came out, key Scottish feminist organisation Engender was very aware of the dangers of any rollback of rights.

For us, the Equality Act represents the floor and not the ceiling of what we need to achieve on equality as a society. Any backsliding should be of concern to everyone that stands against discrimination and oppression in all its forms.

Generations of feminists have fought against women being defined by our reproductive function and bodies. We will therefore be playing close attention to what this decision will mean in practice for women. As intersectional feminists, we remain concerned about what this means for trans people’s rights. We urge government and public bodies to uphold protections against discrimination and harassment for a group that is facing such misrepresentation and marginalisation in our culture.

 

This Pride month is important as an opportunity to demand better of the politicians who should know better but who are enabling such regression.

LGBT+ Lib Dems have some ideas as to what needs to change.

 

It’s Pride Month 2025 – wherever you are, we hope you have a safe one. 🧡🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️

People have rightly been asking what we mean when we say we @libdems.org.uk need to ‘do better’ or ‘step up’ as a party. There’s no such thing as ‘done’ of course – but this is what we’re pushing for currently.
1/2

[image or embed]

— LGBT+ Liberal Democrats 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️ (@pluslibdems.bsky.social) June 1, 2025 at 11:15 AM

Ed Davey said in a blog on the party website:

Today marks the beginning of Pride Month – an important opportunity to celebrate and stand in solidarity with LGBTQ+ communities in the UK and across the world.

I know that for many, Pride will feel different this year. It hasn’t been an easy time for many LGBTQ+ people lately, to put it mildly. And I understand why it may feel like there is little to celebrate right now.

It’s clear the fight for LGBTQ+ equality must go on – and I’m determined that Liberal Democrats remain at the forefront of that fight. That includes pushing the Government to ensure the recent Supreme Court ruling doesn’t lead to a roll back of trans rights.

Of course, Liberal Democrats have long played an important role in pushing for LGBTQ+ equality. Like being the first political party to openly oppose the abhorrent Section 28 legislation, back in the ‘80s. And our instrumental role in getting the Same Sex Marriage Act passed in 2013.

More recently, I’m proud of the incredible work our Equalities Spokesperson, Christine Jardine, has done alongside LGBT+ Liberal Democrats to reaffirm our party’s commitment to LGBTQ+ rights at our Spring Conference. Together, they set out a clear plan of how we can push for LGBTQ+ equality – from addressing discrimination wherever it occurs, to improving access to healthcare and protecting LGBTQ+ rights abroad.

But the work doesn’t stop there. Now, we must put these policies into action and keep doing everything we can to push for the positive change that the LGBTQ+ community deserves.

Because for years, the Conservatives targeted vulnerable LGBTQ+ people – and the trans community in particular – with their divisive culture wars. And I know that many people feel deeply let down by the Labour Government’s track record so far when it comes to standing up for LGBTQ+ rights.

Now more than ever, the Liberal Democrats must stand with the LGBTQ+ community. I want to make clear that our party will keep pushing to ensure that everyone’s fundamental rights are protected, no matter your orientation or identity.

So we will keep fighting – until we can finally build a society where everyone is free to be who they are. And that will certainly be something to celebrate.

Our challenge this Pride month is to make everybody believe that they have a stake in defending and strengthening human rights and civil liberties because it could be their rights under attack next.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Neil Hickman 2nd Jun '25 - 8:02am

    Ah, yes. Section 28.
    And the good old Labour Party. Not.
    A couple of years ago, the Grauniad marked Pride by commissioning short pieces from a number of people, including Saint Tony Blair. Blair assured his readers that he had always abhorred Section 28 “which is why the first thing I did when I became Prime Minister was to repeal it” (That’s not a direct quote, for a reason I’ll explain).
    Awkward historical fact – while on this as on much else, Scotland led the way, Section 28 was actually repealed in the UK as a whole in 2003, well into Blair’s second term. Earlier attempts to repeal it had been successfully derailed by opposition led by Baroness Young but enthusiastically supported by the likes of Blunkett.
    If you now search the Grauniad site for Blair’s article, you won’t find it. It’s been airbrushed. Can’t have anything out there telling people that Saint Tony Blair told porkies, can we.

  • Jack Meredith 2nd Jun '25 - 8:22am

    Fantastic piece, Caron. The ongoing attacks on the LGBTQIA+ community have been nothing short of inhumane. While it is true that there will always be people in society who do wrong, the government should target them by strengthening the rights of victims, rather than attacking an entire community. There are no “anti-men” laws despite the number of sexual assault cases in our country. Criminals do wrong, not communities, and attacking trans people simply because of internal prejudices and fear is despicable. Plus, I do love a Roy Jenkins reference!

  • What an adorable photo Caron ❤️.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

This post has pre moderation enabled, please be patient whilst waiting for it to be manually reviewed. Liberal Democrat Voice is made up of volunteers who keep the site running in their free time.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Roland
    >". If Chloe is referring to VAT on public school education then I disagree. Those who can afford £ 65,000 p.a. in fees at Eton can well afford to pay the V...
  • David Raw
    Poll rating amongst teachers ? But, they happily gobbled up the 10% pay rise Ms Phillipson arranged for them though, Chloe. As to being a nasty piece of work, ...
  • Chloe
    Her poll rating amongst teachers is awful, & to read the teachers blogs about the reforms she put in place is an eye-opener. Above all else, those calling ...
  • Tom Bailey
    In the 1970’s an American man called Walter Carlos was a serious well established musician, professional in the world of electronic music. At some point he w...
  • Chloe
    'The truth is that our freedoms are being subtly eroded in an era where emotion and sentiment are prized above reason and rationality'... KB...