Kirsty on Lembit: “His approach to politics is different to mine.”

Getting on for a year ago, Lib Dem MP Lembit Opik began writing a regular political column in the Daily Sport. Thanks to Lib Dem blogger James Graham – who set up the Prawn Free Lembit blog, so that those of us who don’t touch the Sport’s casually misogynistic pages can follow his writings – I’ve become a regular reader.

It’s a weird, dire mixture of straight news and forced comedy-innuendo. Commentary on Barack Obama’s Nobel Peace prize and the plight of British troops in Afghanistan jostle for space alongside groaning references to “Sport stunna Marlena Lewis from Cornwall” and her euphemistic “Cornish pasties”. Even – and especially – where I agree with Lembit, the sexed-up tabloid-speak style is excruciating.

Frankly I don’t care that this is fulfilling his own “stated objective to reach beyond the normal political limits to people who may not be particularly interested in Parliament, but will find it interesting if the info is presented in a non-pompous or technical way.” If my name appeared above the tat that Lembit (or the Sport’s ghost-writer) churn out I would curl up and die of embarrassment.

If Lembit has won over even one Sport reader to the party’s cause I’d be staggered. To be clear, I mean genuinely won them over, persuaded them that liberalism and the Lib Dems are the best solution to this nation’s ills – not just given Lembit a cheery thumbs-up in a pub somewhere, which he’s taken as approbation for associating his and the party’s name with the flippant, sexist filth that is the Sport’s hallmark.

Anyways … that’s what I think. But it seems I’m not alone, for the Welsh Lib Dems’ leader is also un-enamoured of Lembit’s, erm, column. WalesOnline reports in full:

Ms Williams, who is attending the party’s spring conference in Wrexham this weekend, told Wales on Sunday she would never read Mr Opik’s column and did not like his approach to politics. She said: “I don’t read the newspaper. Lembit is Lembit. His approach to politics is different to mine.”

Describing herself as a feminist, she added: “It’s not a publication I would read. There’s nothing in that newspaper that would be of interest to me. Lembit is free to write his column, I wouldn’t write in such a way. I’m not in the business of telling him to stop what he’s doing. Personally, it’s not an approach to politics that I find particularly attractive.”

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Wales.


  • StickyVicky 19th Oct '09 - 6:57pm

    But what about Welsh Lib Dem Leader Kirsty Williams? She wanted to put some clear orange / yellow water between her and Lembit – then showered him with the stuff in ‘Wales on Sunday’!

  • Is this a story for any reason other than that Stephen Tall doesn’t like the Daily Sport? His rant about the paper is far longer than the weak point it’s trying to make.

    Different Liberal Democrats have different ways of doing things. There are a lot of Lib Dems whose approach to promoting the party is, in my opinion, pretty useless. Their opinion obviously differs.

    I really don’t think there’s any drama to be had here. Stephen is making a mountain out of a molehill based on his own dislike of a newspaper.

  • Stephen, to paraphrase the way you make one of your points:

    If Lib Dems drawing attention to the difference in opinions between fellow Lib Dems won over even one reader to the party’s cause I’d be staggered.

    Whatever your opinion on Lembit or the Sport, neither one is haemorrhaging votes for the party. I don’t buy the Sport, but I don’t buy the Mail either and there’s no criticism of Vince Cable in your piece for writing in such a filthy homophobic racist rag.

  • David Langshaw 19th Oct '09 - 10:44pm

    No, Kirsty….it’s different FROM, different FROM!

  • As long as the Lib Dems are far too good to associate with Daily Sport readers, they will remain a party for people who are far too good to associate with Daily Sport readers.

  • Malcolm Todd 20th Oct '09 - 9:00am

    @ David Langshaw (No, Kirsty….it’s different FROM, different FROM!)

    Here’s Fowler’s Modern English Usage:
    The commonly expressed view that ‘different’ should only be followed by ‘from’ and never by ‘to’ or ‘than’ is not supportable in the face of past and present evidence or of logic…

    Say no to grammar fascism! 😉

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Nonconformistradical
    How much of a democracy do we have left, bearing in mind
  • Steve Trevethan
    And lo, here is an attachment with a full and feasible list of tax efficiency savings which would do wonders for our mutilated infrastructures!
  • Andy Hyde
    The Tory claim of descent into mob violence rings very hollow. Where were they in 2019 when my then Conservative MP faced death threats (including at a party me...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Vote for DEMOCRACY! Vote Liberal Democrat! Vote for TOLERANCE! Votre Liberal Democrat! ? Might we also add reform of o...
  • John Waller
    On 3 March 2022 AOL said Zelensky called for direct negotiations with Putin. On 11 March 2022 Pope Francis offered to Putin to mediate. Putin said “not no...