Labour cuts the number of days Parliament will sit to lowest figure since 1979

Over the next year Parliament will sit for just 128 days, the lowest figure since 1979.

Although MPs do much valuable work when Parliament isn’t sitting (for example, Hornsey & Wood Green MP Lynne Featherstone used this summer’s recess to call round on the residential care homes and sheltered housing in her constituency and last year’s to call round on the shops to find out what issues more effect them and need sorting), cutting back on the amount of time Parliament sites makes it much easier for Government to avoid scrutiny and to push through legislation without proper debate.

Simon Hughes raised this in Parliament yesterday, making the good point that the power to decide such matters should rest with Parliament rather than with the Government, but no surprises that Labour’s response wasn’t to welcome this idea.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Bibliophylax 25th Oct '08 - 12:04pm

    Good point James Graham. Another point is that the provisional Parliamentary calendar announced last week doesn’t include the date of prorogation, so they could extend the 2008-09 session into December as they have this year, making the number of sitting days more comparable.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jack Nicholls
    You are for this and so many reasons a total inspiration to me Caron ☺️🔶🌈...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Thank you for a bravely honest article! Might the “leadership” which took the L. D party into enforced student debts/loans have been confused about the i...
  • David Le Grice
    Weird that this appears to be the first LDV article about this, and the first time anyone in the parliamentary party has spoken up about it (as far as I'm aware...
  • Jack
    Delighted to see conference overwhelmingly reject the EHRC guidance (they don't deserve three quarters of that name - I accept they are a commission). People ar...
  • Geoff Reid
    Somebody had to say it eventual!y. Thank you Tom for inviting us to be honest on this matter....