From the BBC:
Labour peer Lord Sugar has urged people not to vote for his party’s candidate Ken Livingstone.
The peer defied Labour leader Ed Miliband by telling his 1.8 million followers on Twitter not to back the former mayor’s bid for re-election.
“I seriously suggest NO ONE votes for Livingstone in the Mayoral elections,” he wrote.
I don’t care if Ed Miliband is backing Livingstone . I seriously suggest NO ONE votes for Livingstone in the Mayoral elections
— Lord Sugar (@Lord_Sugar) April 19, 2012
* Mark Pack is a member of the Federal Board and editor of Liberal Democrat Newswire.
Follow @LibDemVoice on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Tories at war
Taught Threads
A cat in Clarendon Park
Conservative government is failing in its duty to protect the public
Hey older woman, just don't stop please
Former Labour council leader voting Lib Dem and delivering Lib Dem leaflets
The Tory leadership, a pointless distraction
The Good Doctor, by Juno Dawson
Reporting Back: Annual Council and Mayor Making
Glenn
frankie
David Raw
expats
Peter Martin
Michael BG
13 Comments
We really need to get the anti-Boris vote who are disgusted with Ken to vote Paddick 1, Livingstone 2 on their ballots. Doesn’t help that the Green candidate is operating as a Labour front, so we’re likely to see a lot of Labour votes going there, but there’s enough distaste for both the front runners here that we should be able to build upon.
If Ken keeps going this way, we might see Brian come second to Boris in the election…
“If Ken keeps going this way, we might see Brian come second to Boris in the election…”
Considering that the latest opinion poll places Livingstone at 35% and Paddick at 11%, one can only marvel at comments like this.
I don’t think we should be making any recommendations for 2nd preference. Personally I am more anti-Ken than anti-Boris and shall use my 2nd preference accordingly. But if we start making recommendations as a party then we make it look like Brian is not a serious contender.
No surprise here the two of them are known not to get on. He would lose the Labour Whip if he recommended another candidate though…
So why has Ken not lost the Labour whip for backing that Islamist in Tower Hamlets?
or rather, why has he not been expelled (since he has no whip… silly me)
This looks like a complete non-story to me. Why should anyone care?
Chris, I don’t think Brian should make a blanket recommendation for the other preference, like Jenny and Ken have done – but we should try to point out to those disgusted with Ken and opposed to Boris that they can safely vote Brian as their first preference without worrying about letting Boris in, by putting Ken as second pref.
@Chris,
We’re on 11%? Well, that’s five points better than I thought. Obviously we are at the beginning of PADDICKMANIA!!!
(Well, why not? It’s no more ludicrous than its predecessor…)
Dave was clearly suggesting that we could tempt Labour supporters who don’t like Ken to try Brian as their first pref while still being able to use their second pref on Ken as a back up.
“Dave was clearly suggesting that we could tempt Labour supporters who don’t like Ken to try Brian as their first pref while still being able to use their second pref on Ken as a back up.”
Well, obviously that wasn’t the part of his comment I was disagreeing with.
I did quote the bit I was referring to, to make it specially easy (as I thought!) for people to understand.
Brian is probably too qualified and not sufficiently preposterous to be London Mayor. Look at what we have: a self-styled tribune of the people who is as aggressive about protecting his income as any City commodities trader, and a buffoon who found his true calling in hosting “Have I Got News for You”. Sound and fury signifying nothing, least of all, progress.
Did Sir Alan share his reasons for why we should not vote for Ken Livingstone?
If not, why not? Are we expected to unquestionably accept his every word like some ambitious wannabee apprentice s.