Labour takes Wakefield

Simon Lightwood has won the Wakefield by-election overturning the Conservative majority of 3,358 to deliver a 4,925 majority for Labour. He won 13,166 votes, while the Conservative Nadeem Ahmed received 8,241 votes.

This will be cheering news for Keir Starmer, who has been recently taken flak from his own MPs for being boring. It also begins the process of retaking seats in the Red Wall lost to the Tories in 2019.

Our thanks to Jamie Needle for offering Wakefield voters the option to vote Liberal Democrat.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary in print, on air or online.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Yes. Thankyou Jamie Needle. You must be feeling like a bit of an afterthought today, but we appreciate what you did for us these past few weeks.

  • Peter Martin 24th Jun '22 - 12:09pm

    It was certainly an excellent result for the Lib Dems in Tiverton. Well done for that; but was this really “cheering news for Keir Starmer”?

    At a time when the situation could hardly be more favourable, with the Tory party in complete disarray, it’s not such a great victory for Labour. The percentage polled in Wakefield was 47.9% compared to 49.7% in 2017.

    The number of Labour votes in Wakefield was 13,166. Down from 22,987 in 2017. This was when the weather conditions were ideal for a better than usual bye-election turn-out. The overall low figure of 39.5% is an indicator of the level of abstentions and apathy. 60.5% or registered electors just didn’t see the point. How much higher would this figure have been if we included all those who didn’t bother to register in the first place?

    Labour still lost nationally in 2017. The likelihood is that the Tories will pull themselves together and be in slightly better shape by the time the next election is called. Labour cannot be considered to be ‘on-track’ for a return to Government.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    "Ed Davey has been very thorough .....Either one has to say what is going to be cut or who is going to pay more in tax. " This is true for devolved...
  • Jeff
    Jenny Barnes 8th Feb '23 - 11:58am: In the recent past we have actually had negative prices for short term oil futures as well as over 100USD/bbl....
  • Jenny Barnes
    Oil, and fossil fuels, and energy in general are inelastic in both supply and demand. This means that any mismatch between the two leads to very large excursion...
  • Gwyn Williams
    Ed Davey has been very thorough in saying how any increase in expenditure is to be paid. Either one has to say what is going to be cut or who is going to pay mo...
  • Dominic
    @Mark Frankel - financial transactions taxes (including stamp duty) are a pretty poor way to raise money. Much of the burden would fall on UK pension funds - a...