Who made the threatening #cashgordon phone call?

Are you up to speed with the mess the Tories made out of trying to use social media yesterday? They launched a website trying to criticise Gordon Brown for something or other. Part of the site included a twitter feed so that any twitter user using the hashtag #cashgordon could get their words on the site. Users quickly found out that these were not screened before going live, which meant you could get anti-Tory sentiment onto the Tory website. And then the more technically minded twitterati discovered that if you included some code in your tweet, you could make the Tory website do some unexpected things.

All this is covered in Mark Pack’s post here yesterday, Chris Keating’s post on his own blog and also this rather funny image on Flickr.

So far, so silly. Lessons, I’m sure, have been learned about the wisdom of setting up sites that invite user participation but don’t take the time to think through just what that participation could include.

But as t’Voice’s old friend Alix alerted us to in the comments yesterday, there’s a slightly more sinister side to the story too. Twitter user @jimmysparkle posted to say the Conservatives had phoned his workplace, alleged that he hacked their site, and threatened to sue.

Text of tweets

conservative party phoned my workplace claiming they may sue me for supposedly hacking their website… tweeting != hacking. lol #cashgordon

Apparently the woman who phoned was a Laura Cooper, no idea if she was genuine. Claimed I hacked their site. Fail fail fail #cashgordon

This was enough to pique the interest of Sky journalist @niallpaterson who started digging. Before Paterson got involved, Twitter had unearthed that the name of the woman who phoned Jimmy Sparkle’s office sounded suspiciously like the name of the girlfriend of Samuel Coates, one of the Conservative web workers responsible for the site in the first place.

Paterson has clearly got some sort of denial out of CCHQ, because he was able to tweet the following:

Text of tweets

But even in the cab home, i’m working – Tories confirm tonight that Lua Cooper DID contact @jimmysparkle but is not a member of staff

Ms Cooper is a “friend” of party worker, her actions were neither authorised nor condoned by CCHQ. She “felt strongly” abt hijacking of site

How very strange. The story so far seems to be: Tory worker sets up weak site. Weak site becomes magnet for vulnerability exploits. Tory worker’s girlfriend gets upset and phones twitter user’s boss to allege hacking. CCHQ hang her out to dry.

It will be worth keeping an eye on how this story develops during the day.

UPDATE: A correction – although the person making the call was originally identified as Laura Cooper, it turns out her name is actually Lua Cooper.

Read more by or more about , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Online politics.


One Trackback

  • By Lib Dems launch Labservative.com on Tue 30th March 2010 at 7:03 pm.

    […] I wonder how much more the Tories’ failed CashGordon website cost compared to this? Share this story with your […]

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • John Marriott
    I believe in PR because it’s fair to all parties; not because I think it will deliver a Lib Dem government. Provided that you get at least 5% of the popular v...
  • Robin Bennett
    Duterte presides with majority support over what is claimed to be the third-largest English-speaking country in the world, so language is no barrier to understa...
  • Cassie
    CJW asks if it's about 'changing the result' - well to a fairer one, yes. In 2019, it took 334,122 to elect each Liberal Democrat; 50,817 to elect each Labour M...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Wera, Lib Dems aren't going to get anywhere if every discussion comes back to the need to either have a new voting system or reverse Brexit. So, well done ...
  • Peter Martin
    @ John Marriott, "I guess all that means you are agreeing with me. Great!" He could be. Your "guess" is as good as mine when it comes to deciph...