LDV readers say: Televised leaders’ debates will be great help to Lib Dems

A fortnight ago, LDV posed the question, What difference, if any, do you think the televised leaders’ debates will make to the Lib Dems’ standing in the polls? Here’s what you told us:

  • 60% (258 votes) – They will be a real help to the Liberal Democrats
  • 24% (105) – They will make only a marginal difference either way
  • 8% (34) – They will backfire for the Liberal Democrats
  • 8% (33) – They will be utterly irrelevant to how people vote
    Total Votes: 430 Poll ran: 26th December 2009 – 8th January 2010

So, a convincing majority of you – six in 10 – think the debates will be a big plus for the Lib Dems, with only eight per cent believing they will backfire. One-third of you think they will, at most, make a marginal difference, or else will be utterly irrelevant.

This seems right to me – with two big caveats. First, there is always the chance that Nick will be the one who makes a gaffe (“It’s Lib Dem policy to kill all the first-born” – you know, the kind of thing any of us might inadvertently utter under the pressure of hot studio lights and live TV) which is pounced upon by our opponents and the media.

Perhaps an even bigger issue for Nick is winning the expectations battle. The media and readers of this site will be expecting the Lib Dems to get a boost merely as a result of Nick’s presence in the debates. If, for whatever reason, the instant polls suggest no increase in Lib Dem support, then there is the risk that Nick will have been seen to have failed – even if he performs perfectly well.

But we know these risks – and the rewards of success are likely to be far greater than the costs of failure.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Voice polls.
Advert

2 Comments

  • NoOffenceAlan 9th Jan '10 - 10:07pm

    I think there will be a benefit for us by these debates taking place, but by an indirect route.
    These debates will lead to greater awareness of the election, which will lead to a higher turnout, which will increase our vote (the Lib Dems having a smaller ‘core’ vote than the other two parties).

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Jeff
    The British government have indicated a possible workaround if Erdogan refuses to change his mind. It has signed a separate “mutual assistance” treaty wi...
  • Lorenzo Cherin
    David I think I gave it more as an example of where it happens, to relate it to the question Martin put. I am not saying the woman ought to be prosecuted or ...
  • Charley HastedCharley Hasted
    The line here is 'does this disability hurt the disabled person or the people around them more' imo. Haemophilia, Huntington's, etc unarguably cause more pai...
  • Brad Barrows
    @Martin I claim no great theological knowledge but I always thought the Roman Catholic Church believed that sexual intercourse was sinful unless it was to enab...
  • Tony Vickers
    Setting aside the eugenics argument, the bit I found shocking in Laurence’s piece is this: “ This should be a warning about letting those with money fund re...