Stephen Tall

LDV readers say: Yes to Vince’s ‘Mansion Tax’

By | Thu 22nd October 2009 - 6:45 pm

Was it only a month ago we were in the throes of the Lib Dem conference? How time flies. Cast your minds back four weeks, and the Lib Dems’ shadow chancellor, Vince Cable, made a few waves by announcing his wish to introduce a new tax, quickly dubbed the ‘Mansion Tax’, of 0.5% on the value of properties over £1m.

In fact, as LDV’s Alex Foster spotted at the time, Vince was re-treading a policy he’d been forced to abandon just 18 months previously. But, then, a lot has changed in the last 18 months, both economically, and in terms of Vince’s popularity. The surprise announcement caused Vince more than a few headaches, with shadow cabinet colleagues complaining of being kept in the dark. Yet there can be no doubt that Vince’s ‘Mansion Tax’ policy resonated beyond the conference – indeed, was perhaps the only policy that did – and seems to have been met by general approval, including those signed-up to LDV’s members-only forum, with 67% supporting it.

Here’s what happened when we asked LDV’s wider readership – who may or may not be Lib Dem members – to answer the question: Vince Cable has proposed levying a new household tax of 0.5% on the value of properties over £1m. Which of these statements best represents your own view?

  • 49% (407 votes) – Yes, I support the policy and think it will be a vote-winner

  • 14% (113) – Yes, I support the policy but think it will be a vote-loser
  • 30% (248) – No, I do not support the policy and think it will be a vote-loser
  • 7% (60) – No, I do not support the policy but think it will be a vote-winner

    • Total Votes: 828 Poll ran: 26th September – 20th October 2009

Which shows that among the readership of Lib Dem Voice:
* 63% support the ‘mansion tax’, while 37% disagree with it; and
* 56% think it will be a vote-winner, and 44% think it will be a vote-loser.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Voice polls.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • expats
    @theakes 8th Jun '26 - 12:20pm... We simple have to accept there will always be a level of inequality, it is in the human psyche.... Most families DON'T have...
  • Peter Davies
    @Peter Wrigley: You will be glad to know that the wealth ratio between the richest and poorest is already much lower than 10:1. It is in fact negative. There wi...
  • Nigel Jones
    @Mick Taylor, I agree we must be concerned about income inequality in current circumstances, though overcoming this is about taxing the rich, better public serv...
  • Nigel Jones
    @Mick Taylor, you are right to focus on strategy since we have plenty of policy, but i think we also need a vision and better messaging. It is easy to have stro...
  • Nigel Jones
    The New Deal graphic is very helpful but of course not perfect. As to preventing Reform from winning, we need to be an anti-establishment party as Chris Bowers ...