Many thanks to the 16,800 visitors who dropped by Lib Dem Voice this week. Here’s our 7 most-read posts…
Surely it’s time for the Liberal Democrats to part company with Alex Carlile (100 comments) by Caron Lindsay
Clegg on The Last Leg – first thoughts (14 comments) by Caron Lindsay
Open Doors: All 3 versions of the first Lib Dem broadcast of the year (71 comments) by The Voice
Nick Clegg on The Last Leg tonight (7 comments) by Mary Reid
The Left cheers Syriza while Miliband equivocates (66 comments) by Joe Otten
Opinion: Let’s look at the harm caused by Page 3 (100 comments) by Alice Thomas
100 days till polling day (63 comments) by The Voice
Remember: LibDemVoice is our place to talk. So if you’ve got something you want to say, please join in the debate or start one yourself by writing for us.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
High Fell leaflet watch (2)
No, Leave didn't win the Brexit referendum because of Northern working class voters
Two new Makerfield by-election polls gives Burnham 5 and 12 point leads
Reform under water
Geoffrey Payne
Richard Whelan
David Raw
Tom Reeve
5 Comments
Are the 16800 ‘unique’ visitors?
Yes. We use the WordPress statistics facility and the “visitors” count by week, which is explained here:
http://en.support.wordpress.com/stats/#views-and-visitors
“Views” were 55,000+ last week.
@Stephen Donnelly 1st Feb ’15 – 5:42pm
Following Paul’s link:
[[The two main units of traffic measurement are views and unique visitors. A view is counted when a visitor loads or reloads a page. A visitor is counted when we see a user or browser for the first time in a given period (day, week, month).
You may notice that weekly unique visitors is less than the sum of daily visitors for the same week. This occurs when the same visitor appears multiple times during the week]]
So “A visitor is counted when we see a user or browser for the first time in a given period (day, week, month).”
Hmmm … I will now await someone popping up to suggest that we, ‘the usual suspects’, must have at least 16,000 unique browsers between us 🙂
Stephen Hesketh 1st Feb ’15 – 9:37pm
“…Hmmm … I will now await someone popping up to suggest that we, ‘the usual suspects’, must have at least 16,000 unique browsers between us ”
Is there an official list of “the usual suspects” ? Or is it too long to publish?
On Paul Walter’s helpful information – I read through it.
It was interesting – although I do not pretend to understand it all. I have often scratched my head about the apparently huge gulf between what seems to be the tens of thousandsof people who read LDV and the few dozen who comment.
The recent innovation of having special zoned-off discussions which Paul has initiated on the last few Wednesdays has brought in some new names making comments. My guess is that Paul would not regard it as a “flood” of newbies.
I started regularly reading and making comments in October/November 2013. Having looked at some of my early comments it would seem that I was rapidly “promoted” to being described as “one of the usual suspects”. I am still not sure what I am suspected of. I had more than one person accusing me of having spent all the years since the 2010 election being negative and attacking Nick Clegg.
Anyone can search through the archives and discover that this accusation was completely untrue. I only mention this because in the last week I have seen some people described as “whingers and moaners” Anyone who questions or comments on Clegg’s venture into Friday night light entertainment in other than a laudatory fashion is accused of being “a political enemy”.
Such accusations seem to be born out of a blind, unquestioning adherence to whatever is passed down from above.
I would expect that in a supremely hierarchical party such as Marie Le Pen’s or The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
It seems out of place amongst people who call themselves Liberals and Democrats.
2. ‘Clegg on The Last Leg – first thoughts (14 comments) by Caron Lindsay’
Perhaps some anti-Cleggies missed the capitalisation and opened it in false hope.