Lib Dem Voice polled our members-only forum recently to discover what Lib Dem members think of various political issues, the Coalition, and the performance of key party figures. Some 500 party members have responded, and we’ve been publishing the full results. This is the final part.
Party members give Lib Dems 7 out of 10 for influence within the Coalition
How would you rate the extent of the Liberal Democrat influence within the Coalition Government, where 10 is highly influential, and 1 indicates no influence.
-
1: 1%
2: 6%
3: 15%
4: 11%
5: 10%
Lacking influence = 43% (+12%)
6: 19%
7: 23%
8: 11%
9: 3%
10: 1%
Achieving influence = 57% (-11%)
This is the third time we’ve asked the party members who participate in LibDemVoice’s surveys this question, asking you to rank on a scale of 1-10 the level of influence you think the party is exerting within the Coalition. This survey was conducted during the period of controversy over House of Lords reform being dropped, and I suspect that has had some bearing on the results: though 57% give a mark in the upper range (6-10) — indicating the party is exerting influence — this is markedly down on June’s equivalent figure of 68%. The corresponding lacking influence figure is up significantly, to 43%. In other words, Lib Dem members now feel like they are getting much less out of backing the Coalition than they did a couple of months ago. Given the Tories’ breach of faith on the Coalition Agreement over Lords reform, this is unsurprising.
* Stephen was Editor (and Co-Editor) of Liberal Democrat Voice from 2007 to 2015, and writes at The Collected Stephen Tall.
3 Comments
Where is the 7 out of 10 figure coming from? Is it from June’s 68%?
To put these figures in context…
The mean (average) score from this survey is 5.52.
If integer numbers were selected at random from 1 to 10, the average would be expected to be 5.50.
So the score of 5.52 means that party members think that within the coalition, the party neither lacks nor exerts influence but is somewhere in between.
The results represent a rather more lukewarm judgement than the editorial spin being put on them.
Means and medians are pretty useless with that sort of shaped graph. There are clearly two ‘peaks’ indicating a very-far-from-normal distribution. The Party is split between a group which feels there is rather little influence (about 4/10) and a group which feels there is a moderate amount of influence (about 7).
Unfortunately, the matter is confused even more by the lack of a clear agreed definition of what ‘influence’ really means.