Lib Dems condemn Gove’s prison reforms

So the Government thinks the solution to the crisis in our prisons is to give governors more power rather than have a more strategic sense of what the prison system is for and how best to lessen re-offending and properly rehabilitate offenders.

Liberal Democrat peer Jonathan Marks is unimpressed with the Government’s plans. He said:

It is a scary thought that the grand architect who oversaw the dismantling of the school system as we knew it is now getting his hands all over the nation’s prisons.

It is no secret that our prison system is in crisis. We lock up far too many people each year with inadequate facilities and staffing.

These reforms might tackle the problems at the surface but without root and branch reform of our criminal justice system the whole process will be built to fail.

The academy model for schools is falling apart as we speak so why the Government feels that this template is appropriate for prisons is incomprehensible.

Instead we should be focusing on ensuring that our criminal justice system is centred on rehabilitation and diverting people away from prisons wherever possible rather than this continued obsession with locking them up.

For those who do have to go to prison, we should be putting education at the heart of the prison system, to give prisoners the skills to lead a productive life on release; we should be helping prisoners deal with mental health issues and histories of  drug and alcohol abuse; we should be focusing on offering them meaningful support in preparing for release. These things can only be achieved if we increase staffing in prisons, cut overcrowding, and give prisoners a proper amount of time out of their cells.

Just making some structural changes will be no more effective than rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic unless we provide the extra resources and the commitment to make prisons work as places of rehabilitation.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

  • Lorenzo Cherin 19th May '16 - 1:12am

    We should be putting work at the heart of the prison system and far too many offenders lack the realisation that what they do wrecks lives , theirs , and their families and most importantly ,their victims , where there are victims .It is interesting to read Lord Marks on prisoners in the same week his fellow peer Lord Lester , a lawyer better suited to such issues than the BBC and licence fee he obsessed about , which for non payment , often leads to …prison !

    Some joined up thinking would be welcome , as would some genuine reform rather than soft soap.We can advocate for that which is humane to the victim more often , and in that , be far more Liberal and liberal !

    When is the party going to remember that being a voice for the vulnerable means getting back to where things were when Simon Hughes was dealing with theses issues and was just that voice ! The most vulnerable are not firstly , the prisoners , but the victims, first.

    The trouble with prison is many are there who are themselves victims of circumstance , in for pettiness that if dealt with earlier would lead to other solutions .Many are the perpetrators of misdeeds financial , best dealt with by pay back and community sentences.

    Hard work , sport and lessons in self awareness and realisation of where they went wrong and what to do about it ,and restoration is what is needed. Too much attention to tedious and “useful education”, rather than learning about themselves first , and why what they did was wrong . Very stiff upper lip , “get on with it “, nonsense , as if getting a “skill” is all !

    If this was an extract from Lord Marks , good.Otherwise were it the whole , not good enough.Radical can mean many things .We are only radical when we do not go for the obvious all the time , on every issue , however noble the motive , true on junior doctors , on BBC and prison.Radical would speak for patients with cancelled operations , before doctors or ministers, speak for licence payers unable to afford the draconian licence fee before BBC hierarchy , and for victims before anything in criminal justice .Oh.And it would be popular too, as well as right !

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 21st Jan - 10:41am
    Where's Laurence Fox when he is needed?
  • User AvatarInnocent Bystander 21st Jan - 10:39am
    The HoL needs to be replaced. If it has to move then York does not need the economic benefit. Move it to Workington or Middlesborough....
  • User AvatarJohn Barrett 21st Jan - 10:21am
    Mark Pack - "Any idea that because we’ve managed to achieve success in one election for one body we can shut up shop and think...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 21st Jan - 10:12am
    @ Graham Jeffs . Fair enough. I wish you well in your attempts to change things, Graham. But now the EU issue appears to be...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 21st Jan - 10:12am
    Am I alone is seeing the de Pfeffel idea of moving the Upper House alone to, say, York as deeply sinister? To me it looks...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 21st Jan - 10:06am
    I think John Marriott is doing Blair an injustice. ' like PR, Regional Government, a Written Constitution, a Bill of Rights and, yes, House of...