Lib Dems respond to the Spring Statement – Hammond ignores the Heffalump in the room

You know, I actually wrote Autumn Statement in the headline and had to change it. Old habits die hard. I’m so used to the Big Budget being in March and that ritual of having to go and fill up with petrol the night before in case the prices went up…

Anyway, here’s what Lib Dems have been saying about Philip Hammond’s statement, starting with Vince:

The Spring Statement was a non-event. The OECD gave us the clearer picture – that the economy is bumping along the bottom of the G20, well behind the likes of Australia, Canada and the Euro area.

The OBR’s fresh forecasts are still a long way behind the figures estimated in March 2016 before the EU referendum.

It is time the government was honest with the public: there will need to be tax increases to pay for the NHS and social care, police and schools.

This is why the Liberal Democrats have advocated a penny in the pound income tax increase for health and care and why we must scrap cuts in Capital Gains Tax and Inheritance Tax introduced since 2015.

Christine Jardine got a bit carried away with Winnie the Pooh metaphors:

While Conservatives debate whether the Chancellor is Eeyore or Tigger, they are all ignoring the Heffalump in the room. The disastrous hard Brexit the Conservatives are dragging the country towards will make every region of the country poorer.

This will mean a shortage of cash to properly fund our NHS and social care services, and a lack of investment in crucial housing and infrastructure projects.

We need an honest approach to tax that recognises our public services cannot run for nothing, not tax cuts for the wealthiest.

Willie Rennie chided the Chancellor for complaining about the cost of Scotland’s minimum alcohol price, coming into force on 1 May:

Decades of low prices have taken their toll on Scotland. It is estimated that alcohol misuse costs £3.6 billion a year – £900 for every Scot. In that context, any impact on the Treasury’s revenues is marginal. It is a small price to pay to reduce the long term burden on our under pressure health and justice systems.

“Inflation eroded the value of the original minimum price during the years that this policy has been caught up in the courts. That is one of the reasons why Scottish Liberal Democrats have pressed the Scottish Government to introduce a higher rate.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • nigel hunter 13th Mar '18 - 10:11pm

    The Russian event, poisoning, money for ‘favours’ donated to the Tories true or not are leading the headlines. The Spring Statement also takes the heat off the Brexit fiasco.

  • Steve Trevethan 13th Mar '18 - 11:21pm

    Where is there evidence of a quality which would be accepted in a criminal court?
    Where is that fundamental foundation of justice which is that no person should be judged without a fair hearing in which each party is given the real opportunity to respond to the EVIDENCE?

  • Peter Martin 14th Mar '18 - 6:55am

    If I were ever on trial for a serious offence I’d hope the jury would at least start off the trial with an open mind. In other words I wouldn’t want “the voice” on it! The sentiment that ‘he’s in the dock so he must be guilty’ doesn’t make for good justice or good politics.

    The Iraq war was a consequence of jumping to conclusions. Let’s not repeat the same mistake.

  • The IFS echo Vince Cable’s comment “It is time the government was honest with the public: there will need to be tax increases to pay for the NHS and social care, police and schools.” http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-43397798

    “Annual tax rises of £40bn will be needed if the government wants to keep spending constant and balance its books by 2025” adding that dismal productivity, earnings and GDP growth had become the “new normal”.

    …the UK was still suffering the hangover of the 2008 financial crisis and its growth outlook was “the worst in the G20”.

    On the one hand, public services such as prisons and the NHS were struggling “in a way that they were not two or three years ago”, On the other, the government is struggling to collect as much tax as it used to, after taking large numbers of people out of paying income tax.
    “The chancellor has been unable to tackle the problems posed by the increasing numbers of self-employed and company owner managers, who pay less tax than similarly remunerated employees.”
    “If high-paid jobs – and EU citizens, who are well represented among high earners in the UK – relocate elsewhere, the consequences for the Exchequer will be severe.”
    Given the outlook, the IFS said tax rises of £30bn would be needed each year to retain public spending and balance the budget by the middle of the next decade – a Conservative Party pledge.
    An extra £11bn would be required to cover social care, health and pension costs for the ageing population.

    Growth is now forecast to be 1.5% in 2018. However, Mr Johnson said the good news on borrowing would “largely wash out” over the next few years, while the structural deficit in 2019-20 would be almost unchanged.
    He added that the UK economy was now 14% smaller than would have been expected, based on pre-crisis trends, while median earnings remained below their 2008 level.
    “The reality of the economic and fiscal challenges facing us ought to be at the very top of the news agenda,” Mr Johnson said.
    “And I mean the reality, not the spin and bluster of politicians on all sides pretending there are easy solutions.”

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 15th Aug - 10:53pm
    Martin As you do not get quite to the point of insulting people, I regard the comments you make worth noting. I think as one...
  • User AvatarYeovil Yokel 15th Aug - 10:16pm
    Andrew Hickey - I deduced 'polyamorous' must mean something like 'many lovers' but was reluctant to use the loaded and judgemental term 'promiscuous', which presumably...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 15th Aug - 9:54pm
    The honest answer is, "We don't know". What we do know is that to rejoin the EU after Brexit would involve a host of EU...
  • User AvatarGlenn 15th Aug - 9:41pm
    A very brief few days of panic, followed by claims that transition arrangements mean we haven't really left yet, then a couple of more years...
  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 15th Aug - 9:14pm
    Various - Isn't a problem here that there isn't really any such thing as the 'white working class' any more. At least not in any...
  • User Avatarfrankie 15th Aug - 9:12pm
    Paul, How can you doubt Brexit will be a success when you see the detailed arguments put forward by their leaders and the level of...