LibLink: Julian Huppert: Journalists must be able to protect their sources

Julian Huppert MPJulian Huppert has tabled an amendment to the Serious Crime Bill enabling journalists to better protect their sources. He wrote about why this was necessary in the Guardian – apparently over 600 applications have been made to access journalists’ phone records in the last three years. That’s about four a week. As Julian puts it:

How will anyone be brave enough to contact a journalist in the public interest, if they know that they can easily be tracked down?

What’s more, these actions have clearly discouraged whistleblowers from coming forward, having a chilling effect on free speech.

Current procedures do not give adequate protection to journalists:

At the moment the police quite rightly need the approval of a judge before they can take documents from a journalist. But they authorise themselves to access the journalist’s mobile phone records and other communications data. This cannot be right.

As a matter of principle, police and security services should not be able to authorise themselves to snoop on journalists to get to their sources. It may be convenient for the police but it’s not right for freedom of the press and it’s not right for the whistleblowers who badly need protection.

His amendment has the support of our party. He challenges the Conservatives to make their deeds much up to their well-intentioned words on this issue and seeks support from across the House. It would be great if this could be another victory for Commons backbenchers, like with Greg Mulholland’s pubs amendment a few months back.

I’ve proposed an amendment to the serious crime bill to fix this and make sure we protect not just journalists and their sources but also respect legal privilege, including confidential conversations with healthcare professionals, ministers of religion and MPs.

I’m delighted that this is supported by my own party but also that I’m getting increasing support from other parties.

You can read the whole article here.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

One Comment

  • As a former publisher of journals I very much support the principle here behind Julian’s amendment but I’m unclear about the story above. Julian says that the police can authorise themselves to access journalists’ mobile phone records & communications data, but the story says that there have been 600 applications made to access journalists’ communications in the last 3 years. What body were these applications being made to, were the police applying for permission to access communications? — if so that doesn’t sound like authorising themselves.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • JONATHAN FOGELL
    However hard I try, I cannot imagine Farage and Co eqivocating over whether they should or should not leave the EU. Rejoiners clearly have to accept the result ...
  • Manfarang
    There are still many issues concerning Brexit. This for example https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/settled-status-european-citizens-living-uk-brexit-application...
  • Lorenzo Cherin
    As for the link, it is a very considered piece. But it is designed to support the writer's viewpoint, as I mention, he almost seems to push the view , he was wr...
  • Lorenzo Cherin
    Laurence Cox Very unsure as why you presume i did my best to avoid your link, when I did no such thing! You presume you know a lot about my approach but seem...
  • David Raw
    On topic : How Sir Edward's comments were reported in the Glasgow Herald : "THE Liberal Democrat leader has said his party is no longer interested in t...