Three parliamentary committees have now reported on the Home Secretary’s draft Investigatory Powers Bill. All three have raised major criticisms of both the powers proposed and the way they are set out.
That is the opening paragraph in an article by Julian Huppert posted on OpenDemocracy titled Three strikes against the IP bill.
He quotes the reports by the Science and Technology Committee on 9th February, by the Intelligence and Security Committee also on 9th February and finally by the Joint Committee with the remit to examine this bill which reported on 11th February. All were highly critical of various aspects of the Bill, and of the second in particular he claims that:
The proposals around communications data are described as “inconsistent and largely incomprehensible”.
Julian writes this about the latest report
In a rather derisory remark, they say of the Home Office that “We recommend that more effort should be made to reflect not only the policy aims but also the practical realities of how the internet works on a technical level.”
He comments:
This is the Home Office’s third effort to get legislation in this area correct. The first effort was slated by a Joint Committee, and the replacement that was then drawn up was not deemed to be good enough even to present to parliament. This third version has now faced a triple whammy of criticism, and it is now clear that the Home Office will have to make substantial changes if it wants to get legislation through.
* Mary Reid is a contributing editor on Lib Dem Voice. She was a councillor in Kingston upon Thames, where she is still very active with the local party, and is the Hon President of Kingston Lib Dems.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Should the Reform UK leadership take responsibility for violence at their conference?
Printing again
Geoff Marshall asks: What are Britain's least served stations?
The executions continue in Iran
Jana
Michael BG
Michal Simon
Andy Daer
Ben Mathis