LibLink: Kate Parminter: Revising the Politics A-level curriculum

Over the Christmas holidays, Kate Parminter wrote for Politics Home about why she is trying to stop the Government from taking the study of feminism out of the A level Politics syllabus. They are also planning on only including one woman in the sixteen thinkers studied.

It is vital that young people have the opportunity to understand the political thinking and movements that have generated progress to date, and the ongoing barriers to women’s equality. Discussion at the sixth form level is a crucial part of achieving that.

This is facilitated in the current A Level Politics syllabus by the inclusion of feminism under ‘other ideologies that emerged either out of or in opposition to liberalism, socialism and conservatism’. Students are expected to know at least the key concepts of ‘sex and gender, gender equality, patriarchy, public/private divide and [gender] essentialism.’

In the proposed changes to the syllabus the Government will minimise the role women have played in British politics, international politics and the development of political philosophy. Moreover, they are reaffirming gender bias that treats men and their interests as the norm and women and their interests as optional extras.

She highlighted what the Lib Dems had done to advance gender equality and how the Tories are now moving backwards.

The Liberal Democrats as part of the Coalition Government reduced the gender pay gap and increased the number of women on boards. Removing the women’s rights movement and the political theory it produced within the A Level Politics curriculum does nothing to build on that record and move us towards greater gender equality in British society. Excluding women – both as key thinkers and political actors in their own right – sends the message that women do not and have not made significant achievements in politics and political thought. This move by the Tories will have the damaging consequence of slowing down the pipeline for future female politicians, campaigners and leading thinkers.

You can read the whole article here.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary in print, on air or online.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

3 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • GWYN WILLIAMS
    Normally I skip Matthew's article but today I am in agreement except for his extreme views about tennis. The point Peter Martin makes about Wales is a fair one....
  • Graham Evans
    The problem with Ed Davey's speech that it leaves too many questions unanswered. Aspiration has its role, but at some point the party has to come up with some d...
  • Nigel Quinton
    Thanks Iain for another cautionary tale about the perils of assuming Burnham will be some sort of progressive messiah. He is not the messiah, but then he is not...
  • Katharine Pindar
    Yes, there should be a drive to build more council houses, social housing rather than just 'affordable homes', but the powers and funding should go to local cou...
  • Peter Martin
    " Britain has been governed as though every problem can be solved from Whitehall. " Possibly, but do the people of Wales think that moving much th...