LibLink: Roger Roberts: Forcing teenagers back to war zones another example of Tory inhumanity

“Inhumanity” is a word that you should use with caution, but when you are looking at a Government that has no compunction about sending child asylum seekers back to war zones the minute they turn 18, when they may have grown up here and have nothing left to go back to, then they’ve earned it.

Roger Roberts is laying down a marker for the future as this country prepares to take in some unaccompanied child refugees. What will become of them when they turn 18? Will they be sent back to a devastated Syria where they may have no connections, no matter what?

He’s trying to force the Government to tell us how many children they have deported back to places like Afghanistan in the past few years and is so far not having much luck. He won’t be giving up though, as he wrote for Politics Home.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Richard Underhill 13th May '16 - 11:22am

    The 1951 Refugee Convention is still in force in the UK (together with the European Convention on Human Rights).
    http://www.unhcr.org/pages/49da0e466.html
    Each decision has to be correct at the time it was taken. So, unlike an ordinary immigration decision where an appeal claims that the decision was wrong, an asylum appeal reconsiders the entire case on the current circumstances. For instance a political coup or an election result can completely change the circumstances in the country to which an appellant might be returned.
    Between arrival and reaching the age of 18 years there could be a period of months or years. Therefore an unaccompanied minor who also claims asylum can claim asylum again. Whether such a claim has a reasonable prospect of success depends on the country in question. The decision/s of the Immigration Judge or Tribunal may depend on the human rights criteria more than the asylum facts.

  • Richard Underhill 13th May '16 - 11:27am

    “war zones” needs to be defined more precisely. Suppose someone has come from Kashmir at a time of trouble. The return would be to a country and not necessarily a region. Return to a different part of India or Pakistan would be specifically allowed by clauses in the 1951 Convention.

  • There is something about the Home Office and it always seems to have been the case. There was a brief period of liberal thinking when Roy Jenkins was Home Secretary but otherwise its officials who make the inhumane decisions for ministers to sign off to do seem to be a special breed of person. Where does the civil service find them? What has gone wrong with their education? How do they not see that sending teenagers abroad to countries where they may have no family left or society to fit into is inhumane and not worthy of a civilised society?
    How do their colleagues in other parts of the Home Office not see that it is inhumane to deport elderly relatives in their 70’s, 80’s and 90’s whose only family is in this country? And so on and so on.
    Of course one can blame heartless ministers but civil servants have a choice. They could apply for transfers to departments that don’t pursue such unethical agendas.

  • “… civil servants have a choice. They could apply for transfers to departments that don’t pursue such unethical agendas.”

    Perhaps many of them have; what sort of people would that leave behind? Does that explain some of the decisions made?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarNonconformistradical 25th Aug - 6:38am
    @Andrew "This morning I got a letter from the Conservatives asking for a donation (why me?)." That sounds like a very good question - if...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 25th Aug - 2:38am
    Roger Lake, I didn’t understand that your final income tax line wasn’t a final line at all but the additional taxes for each group adding...
  • User AvatarGlenn 25th Aug - 12:06am
    Andy Hinton The links are more important than a couple of shaved minutes here and there. I sometimes wonder if the real appeal of HS2...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 25th Aug - 12:06am
    Welcome back, Joe, you were missed, but I see you have not been missing much of what is going on! At the moment there is...
  • User AvatarAndy 24th Aug - 11:51pm
    I detest FPTP's simple plurality based system as much as anyone else and desperately want PR (not fussy as to whether MMP or STV). With...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 24th Aug - 11:50pm
    David Warren. Thanks, David for your comment at 2.18 pm. Your article plus your interventions have produced an interesting and varied discussion, with scope for...
Thu 29th Aug 2019
Mon 9th Sep 2019